+++
All questions Covid with Dr. Al Johnson and Dr. Peter McCullough
@ 17:14
17:14
nasal saline you know what’s interesting
17:17
is if you remember a year ago more than
17:19
a year ago president trump mentioned
17:21
something about bleach and remember that
17:23
people made all this joy he was kind of
17:25
on the right track that believe it or
17:26
not um a very dilute bleach solution
17:29
dentists use this it’s in the ad they
17:31
use one teaspoon or five cc’s of bleach
17:34
and 500 cc’s of water and believe it or
17:36
not they swish and spit it don’t swallow
17:37
it that’s very effective and it’s very
17:40
cheap but then you have to change out
17:41
that 500cc each day but nasal and oral
17:44
hygiene work is prophylaxis the
17:47
nutraceuticals probably the most
17:48
preventive neutral circle is carcetine
17:50
500 milligrams a day but also 50
17:52
milligrams elemental zinc vitamin d
17:54
of three five thousand international
17:56
units vitamin c three thousand
17:57
milligrams that nutraceutical bundle
17:59
through this outbreak plus the nasal and
18:02
oral hygiene i think make a difference
18:04
excellent excellent
18:06
the other areas that we’d like to talk
18:08
about today
18:09
then is
18:11
uh
18:11
people
18:13
excuse me from the
18:14
hospitalization standpoint uh once i get
18:17
to the hospital
18:20
or
18:21
other treatments prior to
18:23
getting that sick that you end up in the
18:24
hospital is iv monoclonal antibodies
18:27
right
18:28
and then rendezvir is given outpatient
18:31
now or not no not to my knowledge but i
18:33
wanted to update the
18:35
viewers on this
18:37
the monoclonal antibodies are still
18:39
effective and the featured one now is
18:41
regeneron it’s a combination of two
18:43
monoclonal antibodies
18:44
it can be given as an outpatient it’s in
18:46
most emergency rooms big urgent care
18:49
centers some senior homes
18:50
patients should demand it over 65 with
18:54
covet severe symptoms if you head in the
18:56
er don’t let your relative be
18:58
automatically admitted once they cross
19:00
the line into the hospital they can no
19:02
longer receive the monoclonal antibodies
19:03
i don’t know why that
19:05
imaginary line is drawn so you have to
19:07
demand the monoclonal antibodies as an
19:09
outpatient in the er before converted to
19:12
an inpatient remember president trump
19:13
received these they’re highly effective
19:16
they’re grossly underused the us
19:17
government brought bought 500 million
19:19
doses of these antibodies and there’s no
19:22
100 number the seniors don’t know how to
19:24
access them so everybody listening today
19:27
monoclonal antibodies regeneron demand
19:29
it i love to start off treatment and a
19:30
high risk senior with an infusion
19:32
monoclonal antibodies even if they go in
19:34
the hospital it’s going to take the
19:36
seriousness out of the hospital the
19:37
other major thing to demand in the
19:39
hospital full dose blood thinners i see
19:41
way too many patients getting half dose
19:44
lovenox shots or subcutaneous heparin
19:47
they’re getting ineffective
19:49
anticoagulation they need full dose
19:50
anticoagulation when the oxygen
19:52
saturation drops that’s not the virus
19:55
that’s actually micro blood clots in the
19:57
lungs and we need to go to full dose
19:58
anticoagulation
20:00
excellent so
+++
+++
Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Paul Alexander, and Dr. Jane Orient, with Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, will spearhead a panel of health care professionals and patients sharing the raw truth about vaccine-injured, critical ill patients in hospitals. The video press conference will be live-streamed August 26 at 12:00 noon ET, USA, by LifeSiteNews.
+++
This starts at the 19:50 mark
+++
Rosettasister's Weblog 
August 26, 2021 at 7:35 pm
All questions Covid with Dr. Al Johnson and Dr. Peter McCullough
#unido #SARSCoV2
Remember more than a year ago president trump mentioned something about bleach
Remember that people made all these jokes
He was kind of on the right track believe it or not
August 27, 2021 at 1:55 pm
August 28, 2021 at 9:52 am
https://consortiumnews.com/2021/08/27/who-profits-from-the-kabul-suicide-bombing/
Who Profits From the Kabul Suicide Bombing?
Whichever complex tribal coalition is formed to govern the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, it will be intertwined with the full apparatus of regional economic and security cooperation, led by the three main actors of Eurasia integration: Russia, China and Iran.
The record shows Moscow has all that it takes to help the Islamic Emirate against ISIS-K in Afghanistan. After all, the Russians flushed ISIS out of all significant parts of Syria and confined them to the Idlib cauldron.
In the end, no one aside from ISIS wants a terrorized Afghanistan, just as no one wants a civil war in Afghanistan. So the order of business indicates not only an SCO-led frontal fight against existing ISIS-K terror cells in Afghanistan but also an integrated campaign to drain any potential social base for the takfiris in Central and South Asia.
#unido
August 28, 2021 at 10:06 am
https://consortiumnews.com/2021/08/27/who-profits-from-the-kabul-suicide-bombing/
Who Profits From the #Kabul Suicide Bombing?
In the end, no one aside from ISIS wants a terrorized Afghanistan, just as no one wants a civil war in Afghanistan.
an SCO-led frontal fight against existing ISIS-K terror cells in #Afghanistan
#unido #Tucker
August 28, 2021 at 10:32 am
+++
https://rumble.com/vlpx84-announcing-the-defender-countdown-virtual-conference-oct-15th.html
INCLUDES THE WORLD EXCLUSIVE PREMIER OF THE NEW MOVIE “THE GREAT DELUSION” THAT WAS 10-YEARS IN MAKING! Interest in the paranormal and supernatural has been increasing exponentially with many believers and non-believers alike experiencing midnight visitations where evil spirits and even “alien greys” are seen and felt. To top it off, with new Pentagon reports confirming the existence of UFOs, the world needs answers.
https://twitter.com/sharonkgilbert/
[Please pay special attention to what Sharon says at the @ mark. Calling on the Name of JESUS is all one needs to do, because all of us are surrounded by spirits ALL the time. Some serve God and some are deceivers.]
+++
A thorough look at Angels without being boring.
By Mark Mac
I used to think why bother with angels when we have the Bible and the Holy Spirit. Yet angels were a huge part of Jesus ministry. There is more mention of angels in the New Testament than the Old. I once heard someone say something along the lines of, “we’d be foolish to worship angels but it would be equally foolish to ignore angels – if Jesus needed them, we do to”.
Jerame emphasizes that he isn’t seeking angels but to know Jesus. He also lets us know that a true encounter will have impact in our life & character, this isn’t about entertainment but about Jesus and how we can be more effective as representatives of heaven.
I’m not sure I’ve ever heard anyone else share along these lines, but Jerame gives a great view as to why some angels appear to look male or female (especially since we know the Bible says they are neither – I won’t spoil it for you). Chapter titles include – position yourself for angelic encounter, what attracts angels, various kinds of angels, uncommon angels, angels taking human form and more.
The best part are the amazing angel stories, these are sure to stir your faith and maybe even some doubts. If you’re looking for chubby fluffy angel stories you’ll be disappointed. Jerame shares from the Bible and encounter some pretty unusual descriptions of angels and heavenly beings. Each encounter is very unique and he teaches what happened and how to work with angels, how to receive. Also lots of wisdom nuggets along with mini teachings and prayers to activate you in the realms of God and His angels.
+++
https://www.kcm.org/real-help/faith/learn/5-ways-put-your-angels-work
Call on the Name of Jesus.
The Name of Jesus catches the attention of God’s angels. They will respond to the Name above all names and come to your rescue (Hebrews 1:6). The Name of Jesus is powerful! When you’re in a situation where you need help, call on His Name. He’ll send help your way!
+++
+++
August 30, 2021 at 5:39 pm
The Russian Special Presidential Envoy for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, has pointed out that Russia had received the same information from local tribal leaders.
Even former President Hamid Karzai – now a key negotiator forming the next Taliban-led government in Kabul – had at one point branded ISIS-K a“tool” of the United States.
It’s important to remember that ISIS-K has become much more powerful in Afghanistan since 2020 because of what I describe as a shadowy transportation ratline from Idlib in Syria to Kunar and Nangarhar in eastern Afghanistan.
There is no smoking gun – yet. But what we do have is a serious working hypothesis that ISIS-K may be just another CIA shadow army, in collaboration with the NDS.
All that, if confirmed, would point to a dark future: the continuation of the Forever Wars by other means – and tactics. Yet never underestimate the counter-power of those no-nonsense descendants of White Huns and Sakas.
???
August 31, 2021 at 11:35 am
https://www.easterneye.biz/
August 31, 2021 at 12:13 pm
August 31, 2021 at 12:34 pm
The Taliban have already started issuing orders to Kandahar farmers that opium poppy will be a banned crop when the Taliban have formed a government, “adhering to a commitment” made by Taliban spokesman Zabihullah #Mujahid at an Aug. 18 press conference.
https://larouchepub.com/pr/2021/20210830_london.html
August 31, 2021 at 2:30 pm
Down in the Boondocks Radio
#unido #eine #kleine #nachtMusik
August 31, 2021 at 7:56 pm
https://americansongwriter.com/looking-glass-and-the-dreamers-danny-o-keefe-album-review/
August 31, 2021 at 9:07 pm
https://tonycolella.bandcamp.com/album/parable-era
1.
Come Back Lonely 03:57
2.
Decade of Lights 04:48
3.
Crowds 03:16
4.
New to Me 04:59
5.
Airports 03:39
6.
You Got to Wait 02:44
7.
All I Can See (Live Acoustic Version) 03:48
8.
Still Wonder 03:33
9.
If You’re Lonely and Confused 02:26
10.
Can’t Have My Love 04:00
11.
All the Earth 04:51
August 31, 2021 at 10:13 pm
September 1, 2021 at 11:43 am
September 1, 2021 at 12:15 pm
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAuVe9Dj4I62IDfpfImKWYg/videos
September 1, 2021 at 8:21 pm
https://www.brighteon.com/309412a4-65e5-4bd6-a7c9-52805b5a6b93
?
September 1, 2021 at 8:28 pm
00:00
david i’m sorry you have kept you
00:01
waiting it’s my fault
00:03
um are you still there yes i am oh great
00:06
nice to see you again good to see you as
00:09
well
00:11
so um i i think it’s
00:14
it’s best if you um introduce yourself i
00:16
know you’re the chairman of
00:18
mcam international innovation risk
00:20
management but that doesn’t tell a whole
00:21
lot of people what what what you’re
00:23
really doing
00:25
yeah well from a corporate standpoint we
00:28
have
00:29
since 1998 been the world’s
00:33
largest underwriter of intangible assets
00:36
used in
00:36
finance in 168 countries so
00:40
in the majority of the countries around
00:43
the world
00:45
our underwriting systems which include
00:49
the entire corpus of all patents patent
00:52
applications
00:53
federal grants procurement records
00:56
e-government records etc
00:59
we have the ability to
01:02
not only track what is happening and who
01:05
is
01:06
involved in what’s happening but we
01:09
monitor a series of thematic interests
01:12
for a variety of of organizations and
01:15
and individuals
01:16
as well as for our own commercial use
01:18
because as you
01:20
probably know we maintain three
01:24
global equity in the indices which are
01:28
the the top performing large cap
01:31
and mid-cap equity indexes worldwide so
01:34
our business
01:36
is to monitor the innovation
01:40
that’s happening around the world and
01:43
specifically to monitor the economics of
01:46
that innovation the degree to which
01:48
um you know financial interests are
01:50
being served
01:52
you know corporate interests are being
01:53
dislocated etc so
01:55
our our business is the business of
01:58
innovation
01:59
and it’s finance
02:02
um
02:06
foreign
02:49
finance industry of social innovation
02:52
okay i got that yeah so
02:55
so obviously from this the standpoint of
02:59
this
03:01
presentation as you know we have
03:04
reviewed the over 4 000 patents
03:07
that have been issued around sara’s
03:10
coronavirus
03:13
and we have done a very comprehensive
03:16
review
03:16
of the financing of all of the
03:20
manipulations
03:21
of coronavirus which gave rise to sars
03:24
as a subclade of the beta coronavirus
03:28
family
03:30
and so what i wanted to do was give you
03:33
a quick
03:34
overview timeline wise because we’re not
03:36
going to go through 4 000
03:38
uh patents on this conversation but i
03:41
have sent to you and your team
03:44
a document that is exceptionally
03:46
important this was made public in the
03:48
spring of
03:50
2020 yes um this document
03:53
which which you do have and can be
03:55
posted in the public record
03:58
um is is quite critical in that
04:01
we took the reported gene sequence
04:05
which was reportedly isolated as a novel
04:08
coronavirus
04:10
indicated as such by the ictv
04:14
the international committee on taxonomy
04:16
of viruses of the world health
04:18
organization
04:19
we took the actual genetic
04:23
sequences that were reportedly novel
04:27
and reviewed those against the patent
04:30
records
04:31
that were available as of
04:35
the spring of 2020
04:39
and what we found as you’ll see in this
04:41
report
04:42
are over 120 patented
04:46
pieces of evidence to suggest that the
04:49
declaration of a novel coronavirus
04:53
was actually entirely a fallacy
04:56
there was no novel coronavirus
04:59
there are countless very subtle
05:04
modifications of coronavirus sequences
05:07
that have been
05:07
uploaded but there was no single
05:11
identified
05:12
novel coronavirus at all as a matter of
05:15
fact
05:16
we found records in the patent records
05:20
of sequences attributed to novelty going
05:23
to patents
05:24
that were sought as early as 1999.
05:29
so not only was this not a novel
05:32
anything
05:33
it’s actually not only not been novel
05:36
it’s it’s not been novel for over two
05:38
decades
05:40
but let’s let’s take a very short um
05:43
and and and what i’ll do is i’ll take
05:46
you on a very short
05:48
journey through the patent landscape to
05:50
make sure people understand
05:52
what happened but as you know up until
05:55
1999
05:56
the topic of coronavirus vis-a-vis the
05:59
patenting activity around coronavirus
06:02
was uniquely applied to veterinary
06:04
sciences
06:06
the first vaccine ever patented
06:10
for coronavirus was actually
06:14
sought by pfizer
06:19
the application for the the the um the
06:22
first
06:23
um vaccine for coronavirus which was
06:26
specifically this
06:27
s-spike protein so the exact same thing
06:30
that allegedly we have
06:32
rushed into invention um the first
06:35
application was filed january
06:37
28 2000 21 years
06:41
ago um so the idea that we
06:45
we mysteriously stumbled on um
06:48
the the way to intervene on vaccines
06:52
is not only ludicrous it is incredulous
06:56
um because timothy miller sharon
06:59
klepfer albert paul reed and elaine
07:02
jones on january 28
07:06
2000 filed what ultimately was issued
07:09
as u.s patent 6372-224
07:16
which was the spike protein
07:19
virus a vaccine for
07:22
the canine coronavirus which is actually
07:25
one of the multiple forms of coronavirus
07:28
but as i said the early work up until
07:32
1999 was largely focused
07:35
in the area of vaccines for animals
07:38
the two animals receiving the most
07:40
attention
07:42
were probably ralph barrack’s work on
07:44
rabbits
07:45
and the rabbit cardiomyopathy that was
07:48
associated with
07:49
significant problems among rabbit
07:51
breeders
07:53
and then canine coronavirus in pfizer’s
07:56
work
07:57
to identify how to develop s sp
08:01
s and spike protein vaccine target
08:03
candidates
08:04
giving rise to the obvious
08:08
evidence that says that neither
08:11
the coronavirus concept of a vaccine nor
08:14
the principle of the coronavirus itself
08:18
um as a pathogen of interest with
08:21
respect to the spike protein’s behavior
08:23
is anything uh novel at all as a matter
08:26
of fact it’s 22 years old
08:28
based on patent filings what’s more
08:32
problematic
08:33
and what is actually the most egregious
08:37
uh problem is that anthony fauci and
08:40
niaid
08:42
found the malleability of coronavirus to
08:45
be a potential
08:46
candidate for hiv vaccines
08:51
and so sars is actually not
08:54
a natural progression
08:58
of a genetic modification of coronavirus
09:03
as a matter of fact very specifically in
09:06
1999
09:08
anthony fauci funded research at the
09:11
university of north carolina chapel hill
09:14
specifically to create and you cannot
09:18
you cannot help but but you know lament
09:21
what i’m about to read because this
09:23
comes directly from
09:25
a patent application filed on april 19
09:28
2002
09:30
and you heard the date correctly 2002
09:35
where the niaid
09:38
built an infectious
09:42
replication defective coronavirus
09:47
that was specifically targeted for human
09:50
lung
09:50
epithelium in other words
09:54
we made sars
10:00
and we patented it on april 19
10:04
2002 before
10:07
there was ever any alleged outbreak in
10:10
asia which as you know followed that
10:14
by several months
10:17
that patent issued as u.s patent 7279327
10:25
that patent clearly lays out
10:28
in very specific gene sequencing
10:33
the fact that we knew that the ace
10:34
receptor the ace2 binding
10:37
domain the s1 spike protein
10:42
and other elements of what we have come
10:44
to know
10:45
as this scourge pathogen
10:49
was not only engineered but could be
10:52
synthetically modified
10:53
in the laboratory using nothing more
10:56
than gene sequencing technologies
10:58
taking computer code and turning it into
11:02
a pathogen or an intermediate of the
11:05
pathogen
11:06
and that technology was funded
11:08
exclusively
11:09
in the early days as a means by which
11:13
we could actually harness coronavirus
11:17
as a vector to distribute hiv vaccine
11:26
i’ll let you translate that because
11:28
that’s a lot of material
11:30
okay okay so it gets worse
11:34
[Laughter]
11:38
um we were my organization
11:42
was asked to monitor biological and
11:45
chemical weapons treaty violations
11:48
in the very early days of 2000 you’ll
11:51
remember
11:52
the anthrax events in september
11:56
of 2001 and we were part of an
12:00
investigation
12:01
that gave rise to the congressional
12:04
inquiry
12:05
into not only the anthrax origins but
12:08
also
12:09
into what was unusual behavior
12:12
around bayer’s ciprofloxacin
12:16
drug which was a drug used as a
12:19
potential treatment
12:21
for anthrax poisoning and throughout the
12:24
fall
12:25
of 2001 we began monitoring an enormous
12:29
number of bacterial and viral pathogens
12:34
that were being patented through
12:37
nih niaid u.s
12:40
amrit the u.s armed services
12:44
infectious disease program and
12:47
a number of other agencies
12:50
internationally that collaborated
12:52
with them and our concern
12:55
was that coronavirus was being
12:58
seen as not only a potential manipulable
13:01
agent for potential use as a vaccine
13:06
vector
13:07
but it was also very clearly being
13:09
considered as
13:10
a biological weapon candidate
13:13
um and so our first public reporting on
13:17
this
13:17
took place prior to the sars outbreak
13:21
in the latter part of 2001. so you can
13:24
imagine how
13:25
disappointed i am to be sitting here 20
13:29
years later
13:30
having 20 years earlier pointed that
13:34
there was
13:35
a problem looming on the horizon with
13:37
respect to coronavirus
13:39
but after the
13:42
alleged outbreak and i’m i will always
13:45
say
13:46
alleged outbreak because i think it’s
13:48
important for us to understand
13:50
that coronavirus as a circulating
13:52
pathogen
13:53
inside of the viral model that we have
13:58
is actually not new to the human
14:00
condition and is not new to the last two
14:02
decades
14:02
it’s actually been part of the
14:06
sequence of proteins that that
14:08
circulates for quite a long time
14:11
but the alleged outbreak that took place
14:13
in china in 2002 going into 2003
14:18
gave rise to a very problematic april
14:21
2003
14:22
filing by the united states center for
14:25
disease control and prevention
14:27
and this topic is of critical importance
14:30
to get the nuance
14:32
very precise because
14:35
in addition to filing the entire gene
14:38
sequence
14:39
on what became sars coronavirus
14:42
which is actually a violation of 35 us
14:45
code section 101.
14:48
you cannot patent a naturally occurring
14:50
substance
14:54
the 35 u.s code section 101 violation
14:58
was patent number 7220852
15:05
now that patent also had a series of
15:09
derivative patents associated with it
15:11
these
15:12
are are patent applications that were
15:16
broken apart because they were of
15:18
multiple
15:19
patentable subject matter but these
15:22
include
15:22
u.s patent four six five nine
15:26
two seven zero three p
15:29
which is actually a very interesting
15:31
designation
15:33
u.s patent seven seven six
15:37
five two one that is seven
15:40
seven seven six five two one
15:43
these patents not only covered the
15:47
gene sequence of sars coronavirus
15:51
but also covered the means of detecting
15:54
it
15:55
using rtpcr
15:58
now the reason why that’s a problem is
16:00
if you actually
16:01
both own the patent on the gene
16:04
itself and you own the patent
16:08
on its detection you have a cunning
16:11
advantage to being able to control
16:13
100 of the provenance of not only the
16:16
virus itself but also its detection
16:19
meaning you have entire scientific
16:23
and message control and this patent
16:28
sought by the cdc was allegedly
16:31
justified by their public relations
16:33
team as being sought so that
16:37
everyone would be free to be able to
16:39
research coronavirus
16:42
the only problem with that statement is
16:44
it’s a lie
16:46
and the reason why it’s a lie is because
16:48
the patent office not once but
16:50
twice rejected the patent on the gene
16:54
sequence as
16:55
unpatentable because the gene sequence
16:58
was
16:59
already in the public domain
17:02
in other words prior to cdc’s filing for
17:06
a patent
17:07
the patent office found 99.9
17:11
identity with the already existing
17:15
coronavirus recorded in the public
17:17
domain
17:18
and over the rejection of
17:21
the patent examiner and after having to
17:25
pay
17:26
an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007
17:31
the cdc overrode the patent office’s
17:34
rejection of their patent and ultimately
17:36
in 2007
17:38
got the patent on sars coronavirus
17:42
so every public statement that cdc has
17:44
made that said that this was
17:46
in the public interest is falsifiable by
17:49
their
17:49
own paid bribe to the patent office
17:53
this is not something that’s subtle and
17:55
to make matters worse
17:57
they paid an additional fee to keep
17:59
their application
18:00
private last time i checked if you’re
18:03
trying to make information available for
18:05
the public research you would not
18:06
pay a fee to keep the information
18:12
private
18:14
wish i could have made up anything i
18:16
just said but all of that is available
18:18
in the public
18:19
patent archive record which
18:22
any member of the public can review and
18:26
the public pair as it’s called at the
18:27
united states patent office
18:29
has not only the evidence but the actual
18:32
documents which i have in my possession
18:36
now this is this is critically important
18:41
it’s critically important because fact
18:43
checkers
18:44
have repeatedly stated that the novel
18:47
coronavirus
18:48
designated as sars cov2
18:52
is in fact distinct from the cdc patent
18:57
and here’s both the genetic and the
19:00
patent problem
19:02
if you look at the gene sequence that is
19:04
filed by cdc
19:06
in 2003 again in 2005
19:10
and then again in 2006 what you find
19:13
is identity in somewhere between 89 to
19:17
99
19:19
of the sequence overlaps that have been
19:21
identified
19:22
in what’s called the novel subclade of
19:25
sars
19:25
cov2 what we know is that the
19:29
the core designation of
19:32
sars coronavirus which is actually the
19:36
clade
19:37
of the beta coronavirus family and the
19:40
subclade that has been called
19:42
sar cov2 have to overlap
19:45
from a taxonomy point of view
19:48
you cannot have sars designation on a
19:52
thing
19:52
without it first being sars
19:56
so the the disingenuous fact checking
19:59
that has been done
20:00
saying that somehow or another cdc has
September 1, 2021 at 8:29 pm
20:00
saying that somehow or another cdc has
20:02
nothing to do
20:04
with this particular patent or this
20:06
particular pathogen
20:08
is beyond both the literal credibility
20:11
of the published sequences and it’s also
20:15
beyond credulity when it comes to the
20:18
ictv
20:19
taxonomy because it very clearly states
20:22
that this is in fact a
20:23
subclade of the clade called sars
20:26
coronavirus
20:28
now what’s important is on the 28th of
20:32
april
20:33
and listen to the date very carefully
20:35
because this date is problematic
20:37
three days after cdc
20:41
filed the patent on the
20:44
sars coronavirus in 2003
20:48
three days later sequoia pharmaceuticals
20:52
a company that was set up in maryland
20:56
sequoia pharmaceuticals on the 28th of
20:59
april
21:00
2003. filed a patent
21:04
on anti-viral agents of treatment and
21:06
control
21:07
of infections by coronavirus cdc
21:11
filed three days earlier and then
21:15
the treatment was available three days
21:17
later
21:19
now just hold that thought for a second
21:22
who is the choir pharmaceuticals well
21:25
there you go
21:25
that’s a good question because sequoia
21:27
pharmaceuticals and
21:28
ultimately ab links pharmaceuticals
21:31
became rolled
21:32
into the proprietary holdings of pfizer
21:35
crusell and johnson and johnson
21:42
wow so ask yourself a simple question
21:46
how would one have a patent on a
21:48
treatment for a thing that had been
21:50
invented
21:51
three days earlier yeah
21:56
the patent in question the april 28
22:00
2003 patent 715
22:06
1163 issued to sequoia pharmaceuticals
22:10
has another problem the problem is
22:14
it was issued and published before the
22:18
cdc
22:20
patent on coronavirus was actually
22:24
allowed so the degree to which the
22:27
information
22:28
could have been known by any means other
22:31
than insider information between those
22:33
parties
22:34
is zero it is not physically possible
22:38
for you to patent a thing that treats
22:41
a thing that had not been published
22:44
because
22:45
cdc had paid to keep it secret
22:53
this my friends is the definition
22:56
of criminal conspiracy racketeering and
22:59
collusion
23:00
this is not a theory this is
23:04
evidence you cannot have information
23:09
in the future inform a treatment for a
23:12
thing that did not exist
23:15
this could well blow up into a ricoh
23:18
case
23:18
ultimately this is the that’s
23:21
that it is a ricoh case it’s not could
23:23
blow up into it it is a ricoh case
23:26
and the rico pattern which was
23:28
established in april of 2003 for the
23:31
first coronavirus
23:33
was played out to exactly the same
23:36
schedule
23:38
when we see sars cov2 show up
23:41
when we have moderna getting the spike
23:44
protein sequence by
23:45
phone from the vaccine research center
23:50
at niaid prior to
23:53
the definition of the novel subclade
23:56
how do you treat a thing before you
23:59
actually have the thing
24:04
yeah it’s going to get worse here oh no
24:07
it can’t get worse
24:08
oh it does um in
24:11
the 5th of june 2008 which is an
24:14
important date because it is actually
24:16
around the time when
24:17
darpa the defense advanced research
24:20
program in the united states
24:22
actively took an interest in coronavirus
24:26
as a biological weapon
24:29
june 5th 2008 ab links
24:32
which as you know is now part of sanofi
24:36
filed a series of patents that
24:38
specifically
24:39
targeted what we’ve been told is the
24:42
novel feature of the sars cov2
24:45
virus and you heard what i just said
24:48
this is
24:48
the fifth of june 2008.
24:53
they found what specifically they
24:56
targeted
24:56
what was called the poly basic cleavage
24:58
site for
25:00
sars cov the novel spike protein and the
25:03
ace2 receptor binding domain which is
25:05
allegedly novel to sar cov2
25:08
and all of that was patented
25:12
on the 5th of june 2008
25:15
and those patents in sequence were
25:18
issued
25:19
between november 24th of 2015
25:24
which was u.s patent 919 three
25:28
seven eight zero so that one came out
25:31
after the gain of function moratorium
25:37
that one came after the mers outbreak
25:41
in the middle east but what you find is
25:45
that then in 2016 2017
25:50
2019 a series of patents
25:54
all covering not only
25:57
the rna strands but also the sub
26:01
components of the gene strands
26:05
were all issued to ab links
26:08
and sanofi and then we have
26:12
crew cell we have rubios therapeutics
26:17
we have children’s medical corporation
26:21
we have countless others that include
26:26
ludwig maximilians universitat
26:29
in munchen protein science corporation
26:33
dana-farber cancer institute
26:35
university of iowa university of hong
26:38
kong
26:38
chinese national genome human genome
26:40
center in
26:41
shanghai all identifying
26:45
in patent filings that ranged from
26:49
2008 until 2017
26:53
every attribute that was allegedly
26:57
uniquely published
26:59
by the single reference publication the
27:02
novel bat coronavirus
27:04
reveals quote natural insertions at the
27:07
s1 s2
27:08
2 cleavage site of the spike protein and
27:10
possible recombinant 3 origin
27:13
of the cov2 virus the paper that has
27:17
been
27:18
routinely used to identify the novel
27:22
virus
27:23
unfortunately if you actually take what
27:25
they report to be novel
27:27
you find 73
27:31
patents issued between 2008
27:34
and 2019 which have
27:38
the elements that were allegedly novel
27:43
in the sars cov2
27:46
specifically as it relates to the poly
27:49
basic cleavage site
27:51
the h2 receptor binding domain and the
27:54
spike protein
27:56
so the clinically novel components
27:59
of the clinically unique clinically
28:03
contagious you know where i’m going with
28:07
this
28:09
okay there was no outbreak
28:12
of sars because
28:16
we had engineered all of the elements of
28:19
that
28:20
and by 2016
28:24
the paper that was funded during
28:27
the gain of function moratorium that
28:30
said that the sars coronavirus was
28:32
poised for human emergence
28:36
written by none other than ralph barrick
28:41
was not only poised for human emergence
28:44
but it was patented for commercial
28:46
exploitation
28:49
73 times
28:52
ralph barrack i think i saw a video clip
28:54
with him giving a speech in which he
28:56
explicitly told
28:58
the audience that you can make a lot of
28:59
money with this
29:01
yes you can and he has made
29:04
a lot of money doing this oh
29:09
so for those who want to live
29:12
in the illusion that somehow or another
29:16
that’s the end of the story be prepared
29:19
for
29:20
a greater disappointment because
29:22
somebody
29:23
knew something in 2015
29:26
and 2016 which gave rise to my favorite
29:30
quote of this entire pandemic
29:32
and by that i’m not being cute my
29:36
favorite quote of this pandemic
29:38
was a statement made in 2015
29:44
by peter dashik
29:48
the statement that was made by peter
29:51
dashick in 2015
29:52
reported in the national academies of
29:55
press publication
29:56
february 12 2016
30:00
and i’m quoting we need to
30:03
increase public understanding of the
30:05
need for medical
30:07
measures such as a pan corona virus
30:10
vaccine
30:12
a key driver is the media and the
30:15
economics will follow the hype
30:18
we need to use that hype to our
30:20
advantage
30:21
to get to the real issues
30:24
investors will respond if they see
30:27
profit
30:28
at the end of the process end quote
30:31
that’s quite shocking because i thought
30:33
let me let me just read that again just
30:35
because
30:36
i don’t know if i might get lost in
30:38
translation so let me just go ahead and
30:40
read it
30:41
slowly yeah and as americans love to do
30:44
when speaking
30:45
to a multilingual audience maybe i
30:47
should say it louder
30:48
i won’t we need to increase
30:52
public understanding of the need for
30:55
medical countermeasures
30:57
such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine
31:01
a key driver is the media and the
31:04
economics will follow the hype
31:08
we need to use that hype to our
31:10
advantage
31:12
to get to the real issues investors
31:15
will respond if they see profit
31:18
at the end of the process end
31:21
quote
31:26
that’s really i mean peter doshi wasn’t
31:28
he the one who no no peter dashak
31:30
oh
31:37
the person who was independently
31:39
corroborating
31:40
the chinese non-lab leaked non-theory
31:44
because there wasn’t
31:45
a lab leak this was an intentional
31:47
bioweaponization of spike proteins
31:50
to inject into people to get them
31:52
addicted to
31:53
a pan coronavirus vaccine
31:57
this has nothing to do with a pathogen
32:00
that was released and every study
32:03
that’s ever been launched to try to
32:05
verify a lab leak
32:08
is a red herring and there’s really
32:11
nothing that is new in this nothing
32:14
zero
32:17
73 patents on everything clinically
32:20
novel
32:21
73 all issued before 2019
32:25
and i’m going to give you the biggest
32:27
bombshell of all to prove
32:29
that this was actually not a release of
32:31
anything because
32:33
patent 7279 327
32:38
the patent on the recombinant nature of
32:41
that
32:42
lung targeting coronavirus was
32:45
transferred mysteriously from the
32:48
university of north carolina chapel hill
32:51
to the national institutes of health in
32:54
2018
32:56
now here’s the problem with that under
33:00
the buy dole act the u s government
33:03
already has what’s called a march in
33:05
right provision
33:06
that means if the u s government has
33:08
paid for research they are entitled to
33:10
benefit from that research
33:12
at their demand or at their whim
33:16
so explain why in 2017 and 2018
33:22
suddenly the national institutes of
33:24
health have to take ownership
33:27
of the patent that they already had
33:30
rights to
33:31
held by the university of north carolina
33:33
chapel hill
33:35
and how did they need to file a
33:37
certificate of correction to make sure
33:38
that it was legally enforceable
33:41
because there was a typographical error
33:44
in the grant reference
33:45
in the first filing so they needed to
33:48
make sure that not only did they get it
33:49
right but they needed to make sure every
33:51
typographical error
33:53
that was contained in the patent was
33:55
correct on
33:56
the single patent required
34:01
to develop the vaccine research
34:02
institute’s mandate
34:05
which was shared between the university
34:06
of north carolina chapel hill
34:08
in november of 2019
34:12
and moderna in november of 2019
34:17
when unc chapel hill niaid and moderna
34:21
began the sequencing of a spike protein
34:24
vaccine
34:28
a month before an outbreak ever happened
34:34
you you have all the evidence right
34:37
yeah so that’s why my focal isn’t it
34:42
i don’t have to read it again no you
34:45
speak german huh
34:47
yeah okay
34:50
so it’s all about money it has always
34:52
been about money and just to answer a
34:54
question that was asked slightly earlier
34:57
the script for this was written first
35:01
january 6 2004
35:05
january 6 2004 who wrote the script
35:11
before a conference called sars
35:14
and bioterrorism
35:18
bioterrorism emerging infectious
35:20
diseases antimicrobials therapeutics and
35:22
immune modulators
35:24
merck introduced the notion of what they
35:27
called
35:28
the new normal
35:31
proper noun the new normal which is the
35:34
language that became the branded
35:36
campaign
35:37
that was adopted by the world health
35:38
organization
35:40
the global preparedness monitoring board
35:43
which was
35:44
the board upon which the chinese
35:46
director of center for disease control
35:50
bill gates’s dr elias
35:53
of the gates foundation and anthony
35:56
fauci
35:56
sat together on that board of directors
36:00
but the the first introduction
36:03
of the new normal campaign which was
36:06
about getting people to accept
36:08
a universal pan influenza pan
36:11
coronavirus vaccine
36:13
was actually adopted january 6 2004
36:16
so it’s been around
36:20
quite quite a long time
36:23
i’m not going to belabor many more
36:26
points other than to say
36:27
that it was very clear that merck
36:32
knew that sorry that moderna
36:36
knew that it was going to be placed in
36:38
the front of the line
36:40
with respect to the development of a
36:43
vaccine in march of 2019
36:48
and this is a very important date
36:51
because in march of 2019
36:54
for reasons that are not transparent
36:58
they suddenly amended a series
37:01
of rejected patent filings which was a
37:04
very bizarre behavior
37:06
but they amended a number of patent
37:08
filings
37:09
to specifically make reference to
37:13
an intentional or accidental release
37:17
i’m sorry their term deliberate release
37:20
of coronavirus so
37:23
in march they amended four failed patent
37:26
applications
37:29
to begin the process
37:32
of a coronavirus vaccine development
37:37
and they began dealing with a very
37:39
significant
37:40
problem that they had which was they
37:43
relied on technology that they did not
37:46
own
37:47
two canadian companies arbutus
37:50
pharmaceuticals
37:51
and acuitous pharmaceuticals
37:55
actually own the patent on the lipid
37:57
nanoparticle envelope
38:00
that’s required to deliver the injection
38:03
of the
38:04
mrna fragment and those patents have
38:08
been
38:08
issued both in canada and in the us and
38:10
then around the world in their
38:12
world intellectual property equivalents
38:15
moderna knew that they did not own the
38:17
rights and began
38:18
trying to negotiate with arbutus and
38:21
acuitis
38:22
to get the resolution of the lipid
38:25
nanoparticle patented technology
38:28
available to be put into a vaccine
38:32
and we know as i made reference to
38:34
before that in november
38:37
they entered into a research and
38:39
cooperative research and development
38:40
agreement
38:41
with unc chapel hill with respect
38:45
to getting the spike protein
38:49
to put inside of the lipid nanoparticle
38:52
so that they actually had a candidate
38:54
vaccine before we had
38:56
a pathogen allegedly that was running
38:59
around
39:00
what makes that story most problematic
39:03
beyond
39:03
the self-evident nature of it is that we
39:07
know that from 2016
39:10
until 2019
39:14
at every one of the niaid
39:17
advisory council board meetings
39:22
anthony fauci lamented the fact that he
39:25
could not find a way to get
39:26
people to accept the universal influenza
39:30
vaccine
39:31
which is what was his favorite target
39:34
he was trying to get the population to
39:38
engage in this process and what becomes
39:41
very evident
39:42
with peter dashik uh eco health alliance
39:45
unc chapel hill and others
39:47
and then most specifically by march of
39:50
2019
39:51
in the amended patent filings of moderna
39:55
we see that there is a
39:59
epiphany that says what if there was an
40:03
accidental or an intentional release of
September 1, 2021 at 8:31 pm
40:03
accidental or an intentional release of
40:05
a respiratory pathogen
40:07
and what makes that particular phrase
40:09
problematic is it is exactly recited
40:13
in the book a world at risk which is
40:16
the scenario that was put together by
40:19
the world health organization in
40:21
september of 2019
40:23
so months before there’s an alleged
40:26
pathogen
40:28
which says that we need to have a
40:29
coordinated global
40:31
experience of a
40:35
respiratory pathogen release
40:38
which by september 2020 must
40:42
put in place a universal capacity
40:46
for public relations management crowd
40:49
control
40:50
and the acceptance of a universal
40:53
vaccine mandate
40:55
that was september of 2019
40:58
and the language of an intentional
41:01
release of a respiratory pathogen
41:03
was written into the scenario that quote
41:06
must be completed by september 2020
41:10
this was the text where mrs brundtland
41:13
was heading this commission
41:15
isn’t it well this is the global
41:17
preparedness monitoring board’s
41:19
unified statement there there are a
41:20
number of people who have taken
41:22
credit and then backed away from credit
41:24
for it but yes you’re right
41:26
am i right too when i say that also the
41:29
ac2
41:30
receptor that it was already
41:34
described in the patents before 2019
41:37
yes we have 117 patents with
41:40
specifically the ace2 receptor targeting
41:42
mechanism
41:43
for sars coronavirus
41:47
so because they always say this is the
41:49
new thing with the virus
41:50
no it’s not new and it has not been even
41:53
remotely new it’s in publications going
41:55
back to 2008
41:57
in the weaponization conferences that
41:59
took place
42:01
in slovenia in europe all across
42:04
europe and all across um the darpa
42:07
infrastructure
42:08
we’ve known about that since 2013
42:12
its isolation and amplification
42:16
and this um the amendment that merck did
42:18
to this the the rejected patterns
42:21
applications so is was it only about the
42:24
fact that it’s like deliberately
42:26
you know like um put into the
42:28
environment or something or did they add
42:30
anything else
42:32
well so these were fake there were four
42:34
failed patent applications
42:36
that were um essentially revitalized
42:39
in march of 2019
42:42
and it was mederna i misspoke i spoke
42:44
about merck it was moderna
42:46
and i tried to correct that i’m sorry
42:48
that that didn’t come through
42:49
but it’s modernist patent applications
42:51
that were amended in march
42:53
of 2019 to include
42:57
the deliberate release of a respiratory
42:59
pathogen language
43:01
those had not been rejected for some
43:04
reason they were just
43:05
not they were just sitting there
43:07
basically no they
43:09
they they do processes similar to other
43:11
pharmaceutical companies
43:13
where they ever green applications and
43:15
continually
43:16
modify modify applications to enjoy the
43:20
earliest priority dates available
43:22
but that’s why you have to go back and
43:24
look at the amendment
43:26
of the application records to find out
43:28
when the actual amendment language was
43:30
put in place
43:31
but yes i mean the the fact of the
43:33
matter is um
43:35
and like i said i’m not going to belabor
43:37
all of the patent data but
43:39
but any assertion that this this
43:43
pathogen is somehow unique or novel
43:47
falls apart on the actual gene sequences
43:50
which are published in the patent record
43:53
and then more egregiously falls apart in
43:56
the fact
43:56
that we have peter dashik himself
43:58
stating that we have to create
44:01
public hype to get the public to accept
44:05
the medical countermeasure of a pan
44:07
coronavirus vaccine
44:09
and what makes that most ludicrous is
44:10
the fact that as we know world health
44:12
organization had declared coronavirus
44:15
um a a you know kind of a
44:19
a dead a dead interest i mean they they
44:22
said that
44:22
that we had eradicated coronavirus as a
44:25
concern
44:26
so why having eradicated it in 2007 and
44:30
2008
44:31
why did we start spending billions of
44:34
dollars globally on a vaccine for a
44:36
thing that had been eradicated by
44:37
declaration in 2008
44:40
um you know kind of kind of falls
44:44
into the zone of incredulity to say the
44:48
least doesn’t that also mean if you if
44:51
you if you take the entirety of the
44:55
evidence
44:56
then this is a tool the corona virus and
44:58
the vaccines
45:00
this is a tool and and the
45:03
interest of darpa in creating a
45:05
biological weapon out of this
45:07
this is a tool for everything else that
45:10
latches on to this
45:11
including um
45:14
population control for example well
45:17
listen this
45:18
this we we have to stop falling for even
45:21
the mainstream
45:22
narrative in our own line of questioning
45:25
um
45:25
because the fact of the matter is this
45:27
was seen as a
45:29
highly malleable bio weapon
45:33
there is no question that by 2005 it was
45:37
unquestionably a weapon of choice
45:41
and the illusion that we continue to
45:44
to unfortunately see very well-meaning
45:47
people
45:48
get trapped in is conversations about
45:52
whether we’re having a vaccine for a
45:53
virus the fact of the matter is we’re
45:55
not
45:56
we are injecting a spike protein mrna
46:00
secret
46:01
mrna sequence which is a computer
46:03
simulation
46:04
it’s not derived from nature it’s a
46:06
computer simulation
46:08
of a sequence which has been known and
46:12
patented for years and what we know
46:15
is that that sequence as reported is
46:18
reported across
46:19
things like you know the very reliable
46:22
phone conversations that took place
46:24
between
46:24
moderna and the vaccine research center
46:27
by self
46:28
report where i don’t know if you were on
46:30
a phone call and you heard a t
46:32
t c c g g t t c c g
46:35
a b b b you know is there any chance you
46:37
might get
46:38
a a a letter a val or a consonant
46:41
dropped here or there
46:42
the the the ludicrous nature of the
46:46
story that this is somehow prophylactive
46:50
or preventative flies in the face of a
46:53
hundred percent of the evidence because
46:55
the evidence makes it abundantly clear
46:57
that there has been no effort by any
46:59
pharmaceutical company
47:01
to combat the virus
47:04
this is about getting people injected
47:07
with the known to be harmful
47:11
s1 spike protein so
47:15
the the cover story is that if you get
47:17
an expression of a spike protein
47:20
you’re going to have some sort of
47:21
general symptomatic relief
47:24
but the fact of the matter is there has
47:26
never been an
47:27
intent to vaccinate a population as
47:30
defined by
47:32
the vaccination universe and and it’s
47:34
important
47:35
i mean let’s let’s review just for the
47:37
record
47:39
when anthony fauci tried desperately
47:42
to get some of his quote synthetic rna
47:46
vaccines published he had his own
47:49
patents rejected by the patent office
47:53
and i want to read what the patent
47:56
office
47:56
told him when niaid’s
48:00
own anthony fauci thought that he could
48:02
get an mrna-like
48:05
vaccine patented as a vaccine
48:09
and here’s the quote these arguments are
48:13
persuasive to the extent that an
48:15
antigenic peptide stimulates an immune
48:18
response
48:19
that may produce antibodies that bind to
48:21
a specific peptide or protein
48:23
but it is not persuasive in regards to a
48:26
vaccine
48:28
okay this is the patent office this is
48:30
not some sort of public health agency
48:32
this is the patent office
48:34
the immune response produced by a
48:36
vaccine must
48:38
be more than merely some immune response
48:41
but must also be protective as
48:45
noted in the previous office action the
48:47
art recognizes the term vaccine
48:49
to be a compound which prevents
48:52
infection
48:54
applicant has not demonstrated that the
48:58
instantly claimed vaccine meets even the
49:01
lower standard set forth in the
49:02
specification
49:04
let alone the standard definition for
49:06
being operative
49:07
in regards therefore claims five
49:10
seven and nine are not operative as the
49:13
anti-hiv vaccine which is what he was
49:15
working on
49:17
is not patentable utility
49:20
so so anthony fauci himself was told by
49:24
the patent office themselves
49:26
that what he was proposing as a vaccine
49:29
does
49:30
not meet the patentable standard the
49:32
legal standard or the clinical standard
49:37
i know that david i know a lot of our
49:40
viewers are really shocked i can see
49:42
that from the responses one of
49:44
our viewers is uh our pcr test
49:46
specialist
49:47
professor camera she can’t believe
49:51
what’s going on here
49:53
well um here here’s
49:57
this the sad and sober irony
50:00
is that i raised these issues beginning
50:03
in 2002
50:07
after the anthrax scare
50:11
and the tragedy is we are now
50:14
sitting in a world where we have
50:17
hundreds of millions of people
50:19
who are being injected with a pathogen
50:22
stimulating
50:24
computer sequence which is being
50:28
sold under what the patent office
50:31
what the medical profession and what the
50:34
fda in its own clinical standards
50:38
would not suggest is a vaccine but by
50:41
using the term
50:43
we actually are now subjecting hundreds
50:46
of millions of people
50:48
to what was known to be by 2005
50:52
a biological
51:46
so i have i obviously have hundreds of
51:49
hours of
51:50
of this stuff committed to memory
51:51
because i’ve been doing it for two
51:53
decades but
51:54
if you have any questions i’d be happy
51:55
to answer them
51:57
there i’m sure they’re going to be
51:58
hundreds of questions david
52:00
we’re going to be in touch i think
52:02
you’re going to be flooded by people
52:04
by people’s uh emails etc i’m just going
52:07
to forward
52:07
what comes in or we’re going to forward
52:09
what comes in but i do think
52:12
but oh yeah we have martin schwab he
52:14
probably has
52:15
has a really serious question
52:18
and after me uh wolfgang too okay
52:22
uh um i’m a legal professor with the
52:25
faculty of law here in budapest and uh
52:30
um
52:32
uh i have to tell you that
52:35
the constitutional protection unit
52:39
of the ministry of interior affairs
52:43
observes the so-called corona denial
52:46
scene
52:47
uh corona denier is everyone who dares
52:50
to uh disagree to the
52:54
uh with the official line
52:58
with the official line yes um
53:02
if this constitutional protection unit
53:06
takes notice of me taking part in
53:09
discussion
53:10
that this pandemic was put on
53:14
stage intentionally
53:17
they will probably try to fire me from
53:20
my job
53:20
so i have to at least ask some questions
53:26
while i heard you talking i am
53:31
i took a look at patent number um
53:35
what’s which one was it uh
53:40
72208 five two
53:43
and seven uh one five one one six three
53:47
and uh uh seven
53:50
two two o eight five two was filed in
53:53
april 12
53:54
and 715 and so on was filed in
53:58
april 28 of 2004 i see a difference
54:01
between
54:02
16 not three days what did i
54:04
misunderstand
54:06
now april 23rd 2003 was the cdc
54:10
master filing date okay okay
54:14
uh i asked this question because uh
54:18
if they um try to make me redundant for
54:22
my job i have to provide strong evidence
54:24
now we have all of this sent
54:28
to um i know uh
54:31
dr flumix has the um has the entire
54:35
record
54:36
in um the fouchy dossier 100
54:39
of this record is in there um the
54:41
additional addendum that i sent across
54:43
all has the records in there including
54:46
all the priority filing dates as well as
54:49
the issue dates so 100
54:51
of this is in written published records
54:53
and you have the written records
54:55
okay i have created my own file and it’s
54:58
labeled david martin
55:00
okay okay okay
55:03
um there’s a i did a analysis of media
55:07
reportings here
55:08
uh and i can um confirm that
55:11
they give a very one-sided account uh on
55:14
uh
55:16
on the pandemic uh everyone who dares to
55:19
declare
55:20
uh the threat uh less dangerous than uh
55:24
the government does will be uh denounced
55:26
as conspiracy theorists as tin foil and
55:28
so on
55:29
you know so the media exactly did what
55:32
you
55:33
pointed out in the sentence you
55:36
you you repeated twice uh before no
55:40
uh actually uh they tell us the story of
55:43
the delta variant
55:45
which is told to be much more contagious
55:48
that
55:50
everything else um experts i
55:53
have spoken to told me that
55:56
uh the databases uh contain uh
56:00
as many as more or 40 000 virus trains
56:04
so could this could this delta variant
56:08
uh uh be uh um
56:11
some kind of media hive you told us
56:13
about before
56:15
there there is no such thing as an alpha
56:18
or a beta or gamma delta variant
56:21
this is a this is a means by which
56:25
what is desperately sought
56:29
a degree to which individuals can be
56:33
coerced
56:34
into accepting something that they would
56:36
not otherwise accept
56:38
there has not been in
56:41
any of the published studies on what has
56:44
been reportedly the delta variant
56:46
there has not been a population
56:49
are not calculated which is the actual
56:52
replication rate
56:54
what has been estimated are computer
56:57
simulations
56:59
but unfortunately if you look at gs
57:02
gis aid which is the public
57:06
source of uploading any one
57:09
of a number of variations what you’ll
57:12
find
57:12
is that there has been no ability to
57:15
identify
57:17
any clinically altered
57:20
gene sequence which has then a
57:23
clinically expressed
57:24
variation and this is the problem all
57:27
along this is the problem going back to
57:29
the very beginning of what’s alleged to
57:31
be a pandemic
57:33
is we do not have any evidence that the
57:36
gene sequence alteration had any
57:39
clinical significance whatsoever there
57:42
has not been a
57:43
single paper published by anyone
57:46
that has actually established that
57:49
anything
57:49
novel since november of 2019
57:53
has clinical distinction from anything
57:57
that predates november of 2019
58:00
the problem with the 73 patents that i
58:03
described
58:04
is that those 73 patents all contain
58:08
what was reported to be novel
58:12
in december and january of 2019 and 2020
58:15
respectively
58:17
so the problem is that even if we were
58:20
to
58:21
accept that there are idiopathic
58:25
pneumonias even if we were to accept
58:29
that there are some set of
58:32
pathogen-induced
58:34
symptoms we do not have
58:36
a single piece of published evidence
58:39
that tells us
58:40
that anything about the subclade sars
58:43
cov2 has
58:44
clinical distinction from anything that
58:47
was known and published prior to
58:49
november 2019
58:51
in 73 patents dating
58:54
to 2008.
58:58
but could it be that the delta variant
59:01
sort of
59:01
is that just the difference is you know
59:03
that the clinical symptoms are the same
59:05
but that it has the
59:06
the you know the capability of like um
59:10
infecting someone who’d already gone
59:12
who’s already gone through
59:14
like variant b better well
59:17
so so this is where we see an enormous
59:20
amount
59:20
of response and reflexive behavior
59:24
to media hype
59:28
there is no and i’m going to repeat this
59:31
there is no evidence that the delta
59:34
variant
59:35
is somehow distinct from anything else
59:38
on gis aid
59:42
the fact that we are now looking for a
59:44
thing doesn’t mean that it is a thing
59:46
because we are looking at fragments of
59:49
things
59:50
and the fact is that if we choose any
59:53
fragment
59:53
i could come up with you know i could
59:56
come up with
59:57
variant tomorrow yes
60:01
and i could come up with variant omega
September 1, 2021 at 8:34 pm
60:01
and i could come up with variant omega
60:03
and i could say i’m looking for this
60:05
sub strand of either dna or rna
60:10
or even a protein and i could run around
60:14
the world
60:14
going oh my gosh fear the omega variant
60:17
yes and and the problem is that
60:21
because of the nature of the way in
60:24
which
60:24
we currently sequence genomes
60:27
which is actually a compositing process
60:30
it’s what we’d call in mathematics and
60:33
interleaving
60:34
we don’t have any point of reference to
60:38
actually know whether or not the thing
60:39
we’re looking at
60:40
is in fact distinct from either clinical
60:44
or even genomic sense and so
60:47
we’re trapped in a world where
60:50
unfortunately
60:51
if you go and look as i have at the
60:54
papers that
60:54
isolated the delta variant and actually
60:58
asked the question
60:59
is the delta variant anything other than
61:02
the selection of a sequence
61:06
in a systematic shift of an already
61:09
disclosed
61:10
other sequence the answer is it’s just
61:14
an alteration in when you start and stop
61:17
what you call the reading frame
61:19
there is no novel anything
61:22
yes wolfgang i’ll make a
61:25
long story very short he’s he’s in full
61:28
agreement with your
61:29
analysis he understands your anguish
61:33
with respect to you having told the
61:36
world about this uh
61:38
20 years ago almost and he admires your
61:41
tenacity and he’s extremely grateful
61:45
for you having taken this very close
61:47
look
61:48
at the problem through patent law
61:53
it’s dr vodak
61:57
believes that patents are really
61:59
problematic
62:00
because it turns out that it is probably
62:04
five times more expensive to patent
62:07
drugs as opposed to having
62:10
public i mean not public private but
62:13
public
62:14
universities uh getting the stipends
62:17
getting the money that they need in
62:18
order to develop these
62:20
vaccines yeah let me i’m going to do
62:23
something that’s very
62:24
unfair but i’m going to hold the
62:26
document very close to the screen
62:29
and it’s only for representational
62:31
purposes but i want you to see that this
62:33
this is
62:34
this is the um this is the barrack
62:37
patent that
62:38
that um that
62:41
nih needed to have returned to them for
62:44
mysterious reasons in 2018 this is seven
62:46
to and people can look this up on their
62:50
own
62:51
but if you actually look at the the
62:53
sequences that are patented
62:55
which is one of the things that we’ve
62:56
done
62:58
we actually look at um the published
63:00
sequences and realize that depending on
63:03
where you clip
63:04
the actual sequence string
63:07
you will have the same thing or you’ll
63:09
have a different thing based
63:10
nothing more than on where you decide to
63:13
parse
63:14
the clip and and i want to i want to
63:17
read you
63:17
i mean this is something that comes
63:20
directly
63:21
from their patent application when they
63:24
actually
63:24
talk about the dna strands which they
63:27
call sequence
63:28
id numbers they actually specifically
63:31
say the organism
63:33
is an artificial sequence
63:36
an artificial sequence meaning that it
63:38
is not a sequence that has a
63:40
rule base in nature it is not something
63:43
that was manifest
63:45
for a particular natural derivative
63:48
protein or natural derivative mrna
63:50
sequence that was isolated
63:52
every one of these is in fact
63:55
a synthetic artificial sequence
63:59
and if you go back and you look at each
64:01
one of them which we have done
64:03
what you’ll find is that the sequences
64:05
in fact are contiguous
64:07
in many instances but are overlapping in
64:10
others
64:12
where it is merely a caprice
64:14
determination
64:16
that says something is or is not part of
64:18
an open reading frame or it
64:20
is or is not part of a
64:24
particular oligonucleide sequence now
64:27
the reason why that’s important
64:29
is because if we are going to examine
64:34
what ultimately is being injected into
64:36
individuals
64:38
we need the exact sequence
64:42
not a kind of similar
64:45
two we need the exact sequence
64:49
and if you look at the fda’s requirement
64:54
and if you look at the european
64:55
regulatory environment and if you look
64:57
at the rest of the world’s regulatory
64:58
environment
65:00
for reasons that cannot be explained the
65:03
exact sequence
65:05
that has gone into what is amplified
65:08
inside of the injection seems to be
65:12
elusive it seems to be something that
65:15
someone cannot
65:17
in fact state with a hundred percent
65:21
the sequence is x
65:25
the problem that that presents is that
65:27
at this point in time
65:28
as much as we can be told that there are
65:32
you know clinical trials going on and
65:33
there are all sorts of other things
65:35
going on we have no way of verifying
65:38
that a complete sequence
65:41
has been is or potentially even could be
65:45
[Music]
65:47
manufactured into what ultimately
65:50
becomes
65:51
the lipid nanoparticle that is is the
65:54
carrier
65:55
frequency into which the injection is is
65:57
delivered
65:58
and it’s important for people to
66:00
understand that as far back as 2002
66:03
and all the way through the patent
66:05
filings of 2003
66:06
and then the weaponization patents that
66:09
began in 2008
66:11
in every one of these instances
66:14
fragments are identified
66:15
but they are identified without
66:18
specificity
66:19
so we don’t have direct terminal ends of
66:23
the fragments we have
66:24
fragments which have you know
66:26
essentially
66:28
hypothecated gaps into which anything
66:32
can be placed and that’s the reason why
66:34
i find
66:36
the fact checking around the patent
66:38
situation to be most
66:40
disappointing because
66:43
the reason why fact checkers
66:47
among their general lazy attributes the
66:49
reason why fact
66:51
checkers are not actually checking facts
66:53
when it comes to the patent matters
66:56
is because the actual sequences
67:00
are not represented in a digital form
67:03
that makes it easy to do this comparison
67:06
we literally had to take images of
67:10
submitted typed paper
67:13
and then code those in to do our own
67:16
assessment you cannot do this
67:19
on the epos patent site you cannot do
67:21
this with
67:22
wipo data from geneva you cannot do this
67:24
with the u.s patent office data
67:26
you actually have to go in and
67:28
reconstruct
67:30
the actual gene sequences by hand and
67:32
then you compare them
67:34
to what has been uploaded on the public
67:36
servers and that’s where you find
67:39
that the question of novelty is
67:41
something that was not addressed
67:42
this was a manufactured illusion
67:46
i had one more question is it possible
67:50
that we have we see
67:51
that the the influencer has has vanished
67:55
is gone we don’t have influenza anymore
67:59
the influenza for sure is the viruses
68:01
are also sequenced
68:03
and is it possible that those that those
68:06
parts sequences we now speak about
68:09
that they may they may exist in in both
68:12
of
68:13
the virus types so that it’s just
68:16
a matter of testing and matter of
68:19
instruments to observe
68:20
what we find whether we find influenza
68:22
or whether we find
68:23
corona if we if we have a certain if you
68:26
have a book
68:27
you have a word with with five letters
68:30
and you will find this
68:31
five letters in many books right exactly
68:34
and
68:35
yeah yeah wolfgang your question is is a
68:38
beautiful metaphor
68:40
of exactly the problem the problem is
68:43
if what we’re looking for is something
68:46
we’ve decided
68:47
we’ve decided is worth looking for
68:50
then we’ll find it and the good news is
68:53
we’ll find it a bunch of places
68:55
and if we’ve decided that we’re no
68:56
longer looking for a thing
68:58
it’s not entirely surprising that we
69:00
don’t find it because we’re not looking
69:02
for it
69:04
the fact of the matter is whether it’s
69:05
the rtpcr tests that we
69:07
decided that there are fragments which
69:09
by the way
69:11
i have looked at every one of the
69:13
regulatory submissions
69:16
that has been submitted to the fda
69:19
to try to figure out what was the gold
69:21
standard
69:23
to get the emergency use authorization
69:27
and what fragment of sars cov2 was
69:30
officially the official fragment that
69:32
was the comparator standard
69:35
and the problem is that you can’t get a
69:38
single standard
69:41
so the question becomes in a world where
69:44
there is no single standard
69:47
what is it that you actually find
69:50
because
69:50
if i’m looking for and why don’t i just
69:53
read this
69:54
if i’m looking for c c a c g c
69:57
t t t g
70:01
do i add the next strand g or do i go no
70:04
no no the next bit is
70:06
g t t t a g t t c g
70:09
and you get the point the point is that
70:11
where i choose to start and stop
70:14
i can actually say i found it oh i
70:16
didn’t find it
70:17
yeah and and i didn’t find
70:21
the match that i projected onto the data
70:25
because i chose to look at the data in a
70:28
way that i could not find the match
70:31
influenza did not leave the human
70:33
population
70:36
influenza was a failed decade-long
70:41
pan-influenza vaccine mandate that was
70:44
desperately desperately desperately
70:47
promoted by governments around the world
70:49
they failed and they decided if
70:52
influenza doesn’t deliver
70:54
on the public promise of getting
70:56
everybody to get an
70:58
injection let’s change the pathogen
71:03
there are many more they can change oh
71:05
goodness we’ve got tons more to come
71:08
yes but now we’re on to them
71:11
i would like to to tell you something
71:13
about this development of the
71:14
the the drosten pcr test you know
71:18
because we
71:18
looked at it i mean just briefly not to
71:20
that extent that you now
71:22
looked at the patterns that you just
71:25
described but we looked at this kind of
71:27
miracle or like i mean strange aspect of
71:29
like the the drosten
71:31
um test development because he
71:34
um in in despite the fact that he would
71:38
have
71:38
needed to basically through his employer
71:40
the charity who would be entitled to
71:43
holding the patents on this
71:45
this uh you know his invention um he
71:48
just published the instruction
71:50
to the vehicle so everyone could see it
71:52
so basically the the whole invention
71:54
lost its uh you know deca uh the
71:57
possibility to be patented and that’s
71:59
kind of strange you know when you look
72:01
at it so we asked the charity
72:03
in a freedom of information act
72:06
request and so they they said well
72:10
um you know because it there was so much
72:12
uh rush
72:13
to get get the um you know this um the
72:15
test out because there was this uh
72:18
pandemic going on so it was like we
72:20
didn’t look at the finances you know we
72:22
just didn’t care
72:23
so that’s kind of strange as a as a
72:25
procedure because i mean
72:27
basically this this test is worth worth
72:29
like
72:30
uh billions you know how could you just
72:32
i mean this is a publicly financed
72:35
hospital how can they just give you know
72:39
give away all this this whole thing and
72:42
then because he was also in close
72:43
cooperation with the private company tip
72:45
mulbiol
72:46
it’s the same with hi with which he had
72:48
developed all
72:50
the pcr tests from 2002 from the first
72:53
size and the mass sticker and so on and
72:55
so on
72:56
um so it’s very strange you know because
72:58
he was basically like
73:00
functioning as a door opener for this
73:03
company
73:04
you know because they also said to us um
73:06
so basically
73:07
um it was justin who decided to which um
73:11
possible country or like uh laboratory
73:14
or whatever
73:15
the test uh this you know tip mulberry
73:17
oil company would send out
73:19
the uh the test kits in order to then of
73:21
course make more money because
73:23
he was basically like he had a first
73:25
mover advantage
73:26
you know trust and or this company so
73:29
it’s clear now i mean maybe there was
73:31
nothing
73:32
at that point because there was so many
73:34
patterns already going on so
73:35
basically from this not novel virus or
73:39
pcr test he couldn’t patent anything
73:42
that would have been new
73:43
so basically was really like a a very
73:45
logical to
73:46
thing to do then to to use the whole
73:49
thing as a
73:50
just to you know make um uh
73:53
profit from this first mover advantage
73:55
and maybe justin is
73:56
somehow involved in this whole legal
73:59
he’s one of the most important people in
74:01
this scheme because he’s the one who’s
74:03
whose strings they pulled first yeah you
74:06
need you need to create the illusion of
74:08
demand
74:10
and there is nothing right now that does
74:13
a better job of creating the illusion of
74:14
demand
74:16
than the urgency of
74:19
an event that you’ve manufactured
74:21
[Laughter]
74:27
this sounds almost like comedy but it is
74:29
not
74:31
well it it it is in that
74:34
we we have to realize that part of the
74:37
reason why it was so
74:38
easy for us to monitor and track this
74:41
particular
74:42
you know campaign of coercion and terror
74:46
was because we’ve done it before
74:49
you know i i started my comments by
74:51
making sure people remember that
74:54
when it came to solving for
74:57
the anthrax outbreak
75:00
now remember that while we had
75:03
hundreds of thousands of military people
75:06
in the middle east
75:07
allegedly getting even for the events of
75:10
september of 2001
75:13
we had two postal inspectors
75:15
investigating anthrax
75:17
two the largest alleged bioweapons
75:21
attack
75:21
on u.s soil and we had two postal
75:24
inspectors
75:26
you can’t genuinely believe that two
75:29
postal inspectors
75:31
are the you know the crime stopping
75:35
you know mind mind
75:38
you know bendingly powerful individuals
75:40
in the universe now i have nothing
75:41
against postal inspectors
75:43
but but i can guarantee you that if i
75:46
was investigating a bioterror attack
75:48
i would not have the post office having
75:51
two postal inspectors
75:53
as their crack team doing the
75:56
investigation
75:58
um you know it was disingenuous and
76:02
congress knew it
76:03
and that’s the reason why you know we
76:06
we publish a thing that’s that that
76:09
is not necessarily a bestseller but
76:12
we publish an intelligence briefing on
76:14
every violation of the biological and
76:17
chemical weapons treaties that people
76:18
have signed around the world
76:20
and it’s a phone book that tells you
76:23
where and who and
76:24
who’s funding and and and
76:28
so for us it wasn’t hard to figure out
76:31
that this was not
76:33
a public health crisis this was an
76:36
opportunistic marketing campaign to
76:39
address
76:40
a stated objective and that’s why this
76:43
is occam’s razor
76:45
it’s the easiest thing to describe
76:47
because they’re the ones that said it
76:50
and the occam’s razor reality is they
76:52
said they needed to get the public to
76:55
accept
76:56
a pan coronavirus vaccine counter
76:58
measure
77:00
and they needed the media to create the
77:02
hype and
77:03
investors would follow where they see
77:06
profit
77:07
you do not have anything else you need
77:10
to rely on
77:11
to explain the events of the last 20
77:13
months
77:14
then the actual statement of the actual
77:18
perpetrator
77:19
and i don’t do the naval gazing exercise
77:22
of going in to try to understand whether
77:24
there were mommy issues behind a bank
77:26
robber
77:27
if they’re holding a bag of money
77:29
outside of a bank
77:31
i actually make the crazy assumption
77:34
that maybe they’re a bank robber
77:37
similarly if i have somebody who says
77:40
we need to use the media to hype a metal
77:43
medical countermeasure which is in fact
77:46
the injection of a synthetic recombinant
77:50
chimeric protein developed off of a
77:53
computer simulation
77:56
if i’m actually going to listen to the
77:58
motivation for why that might be being
78:00
done
78:01
i will listen to the person doing the
78:03
manipulation
78:05
who says investors will follow where
78:07
they see profit
78:09
i don’t need more explanation me neither
78:15
okay this is uh
78:19
mind-boggling i’m i’m really glad david
78:22
that
78:22
we spoke a couple of months ago maybe
78:24
three three four months
78:26
ago um and uh we were introduced to each
78:30
other by
78:31
um david i’m i’m sorry um
78:34
james henry right and i was
78:37
trying to find
78:40
patent lawyers in this country who might
78:43
be interested in this case
78:45
now there are a few patent lawyers who
78:47
understand about it but there’s
78:49
no one apparently up till now but maybe
78:51
this is going to change
78:53
uh but there was no one willing to
78:56
tackle this
78:57
in the context of corona that’s the
78:59
problem
79:00
but this is not new i’ve tried to find
79:03
such a lawyer too
79:04
specialized on patents for the
79:06
commission for the german bundestag
79:09
some 10 years ago of more than 15 years
79:11
ago
79:12
and we did not find because they were
79:14
all afraid to be critical on the system
79:16
yes they wouldn’t be they would be
79:18
distracted they would destroy their
79:19
own job this was very difficult yeah
79:22
bear in mind bear in mind that this is
79:25
an old problem
79:26
uh uh because the
79:30
here’s here’s where the problem comes in
79:32
ever since the establishment of the
79:34
european patent office
79:36
the germans and the french not
79:38
surprisingly
79:40
have maintained animosity that has
79:43
you know been just this newest version
79:45
of
79:46
of animosity that goes back centuries
79:49
but when when the epo was set up
79:54
the role of the patent office in munich
79:58
became a very nationalistic
80:01
issue for germany and the notion
80:05
that german patent examiners and german
80:08
patent professionals
80:09
still enjoyed supremacy over the rest of
80:12
europe
80:13
became dogmatic in 2003 and 2004 when
80:18
the european patent office was first
80:20
audited by my organization
80:22
and where we showed that somewhere
80:24
between 20 and 30 percent of the patents
80:26
in europe
80:27
were functional forgeries meaning that
80:29
they were copied from
80:31
previous patents the the german
80:35
representation of the european patent
80:37
office
80:38
lost their mind at the notion that they
80:41
were doing anything remotely wrong
80:43
when the european union commissioned us
80:46
to do an examination
80:48
into software patents a few years later
80:52
at the request of the swedish delegation
80:54
to the european union
80:56
and we showed hundreds and hundreds of
80:58
software patents which were illegally
81:00
granted by the european union
81:03
through the epo and then we found out
81:06
that it was german patent examiners and
81:08
german
81:08
patent practitioners who were the ones
81:12
who were responsible for their filing
81:15
we once again saw that there was an
81:17
enormous outcry
81:18
and so what happens is that we have a
81:21
dogmatically held position
81:24
which says that even though the european
81:26
patent office is supposed to be
81:28
pan-european
81:30
there is still in the minds of the
81:32
german patent establishment
81:35
a supremacy over the rest of europe
81:38
and if you call into question anything
81:41
including
81:42
patents granted on a bio weapon
81:46
you are treading on ground that there is
81:49
no forgiveness for
81:52
yes we have we had some questions
81:56
from transparency international and we
81:58
were
81:59
wiped out the topic was not followed yep
82:03
you just can’t it’s not it’s not
82:05
accessible
82:06
and and that’s just the tragedy of what
82:10
has
82:10
unfortunately become a
82:12
[Music]
82:13
a regulatory capture organization um
82:16
it’s actually not doing the public
82:18
service
82:29
well thank you thank you for the time
82:32
that you’ve spent
82:32
and i hope that it was helpful it was
82:34
very helpful
82:36
thank you very much we’re going to hear
82:38
a lot of echoes
82:41
thank you david and have a great weekend
82:44
okay take care everybody
82:45
yeah you too bye-bye
September 1, 2021 at 8:36 pm
ThisWeekInFascism
The COVID Fraud is Over.
The Illusion of Demand- from the Anthrax attacks to Covid19 (at 1:14:07)
Intentional Release of a Respiratory Pathogen (at 39:58)
CDC committing bribery (at 17:01)
RICO and Racketeering (at 21:55)
There is NO Delta Variant (at 56:15)
Evidence COVID Was Deliberate and For-Profit: “The New Normal Campaign” by Merck Began began on 1/6/04 (at 34:50)
Dr. Peter Daszak (at 30:50)
73 patents of Covid vaccine were created before ALL SARS, MERS and COVID19 outbreaks. (at 27:25)
September 1, 2021 at 8:38 pm
Click to access The-FauciCOVID-19-Dossier2532.pdf
covidtruths.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/The-FauciCOVID-19-Dossier2532.pdf
September 1, 2021 at 8:41 pm
Corona Investigative Committee: Dr David Martin (7/9/21)
https://odysee.com/@thisweekinfascism:3/A-manufactured-illusion.-Dr-David-Martin-with-Reiner-Fuellmich.mp4:8
#LBRY
via @OdyseeTeam
September 1, 2021 at 8:44 pm
https://odysee.com/@thisweekinfascism:3
September 1, 2021 at 9:00 pm
Kanye West – Jesus Lord (Official Audio)
+++
Kanye West – Jesus Lord pt 2 (Official Audio)
#unido #eine #kleine #nachtMusik
September 1, 2021 at 9:16 pm
https://thewestnews.com/kanye-west-jesus-lord-lyrics/45662