Archive for August, 2017

Morgellons Disease fibers are composed of keratin produced by damaged keratinocytes – A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study by Marianne J. Middelveen, Elizabeth H. Rasmussen, Douglas G. Kahn and Raphael B. Stricker

August 19, 2017

Source: Morgellons Disease fibers are composed of keratin produced by damaged keratinocytes – A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study by Marianne J. Middelveen, Elizabeth H. Rasmussen, Douglas G. Kahn and Raphael B. Stricker

Morgellons Disease fibers are composed of keratin produced by damaged keratinocytes – A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study by Marianne J. Middelveen, Elizabeth H. Rasmussen, Douglas G. Kahn and Raphael B. Stricker

August 19, 2017

My Blog

Morgellons fibers at 100× magnification. Note floral-shaped fibers on external surface (top) and pavement epithelium on internal surface (bottom) of epidermal section.

“the fibers are composed of keratin and are products of keratinocytes”

http://www.omicsonline.org/2155-9554/pdfdownload.php?download=2155-9554-3-140.pdf

http://www.omicsonline.org/2155-9554/2155-9554-3-140.php

Excerpt

Discussion

Our three patients had features of MD that are commonly described

in the medical literature, including insidious onset, dermatological

signs and systemic symptoms, lack of response to immunosuppressive

treatment and association with tickborne diseases [1-3]. Case 1 had

skin lesions confined to the hands (Figure 1A), while Cases 2 and 3 had

disseminated skin lesions over the head, trunk and extremities (Figures

1B and 1C). In addition, Case 3 had symptoms associated primarily

with hair follicles, and a sensation of change in hair composition and

texture is often reported by Morgellons patients [1,10]. These MD

patterns have been recognized in prior studies [1,2] and we propose

a classification of localized MD versus disseminated…

View original post 1,103 more words

Mere Human Beings

August 11, 2017

Rosettasister's Weblog

icaro749

DÉDALO E ÍCARO.

The myth of Icarus covers topics such as parent-child relationships and the desire of man to go ever further, even at the risk of having to meet face to face with their status as mere human beings.

Perhaps we should borrow a page or two from the left’s protest playbook.

“El pueblo unido jamás será vencido”

“The people united will never be defeated”

It was especially after Pinochet’s September 1973 coup that the group Inti-Illimani (from Chile) made it famous around the world.

http://www.4shared.com/file/87549850/ec997a4a/Inti_Illimani_-_El_Pueblo_Unido_Manu_Chao.html

Disclaimer: My vanity plate displays “UNIDO” in honor of this song.In 1973 in Chile, I would have been a communist, too.

http://soundedlikeasong.blogspot.com/

http://www.4shared.com/file/87549907/e48719b/clandestino.html

http://www.4shared.com/file/87549975/af078670/desaparecido.html

http://www.4shared.com/file/87549995/3184abfe/manu_chao_me_gusta_tu.html

20061008_el_deivi_daft_punk_03-1

Daft Punk

http://www.4shared.com/file/87550044/bc94b890/Daft_Punk_-_Aerodynamic.html

http://www.4shared.com/file/87550100/de57d3ba/Daft_Punk_-_Something_About_Us.html

http://www.4shared.com/file/87550179/e8cafdd9/Daft_Punk_-_Face_To_Face.html

http://www.4shared.com/file/87550223/772e5edb/Daft_Punk_-_Around_The_World.html

From daftpunkalive

http://www.myspace.com/daftpunk

From karteltube

Son Of Dave covers Daft Punk – Beatbox Harmonica

http://www.myspace.com/thesonofdave

View original post

Antigravity Space and Energy Technologies for the 21st Century by the Disclosure Project’s Theodore C. Loder, PhD

August 9, 2017

Spirit of Ma’at: “Free Energy & Alternative Energy, Part II” — Vol 2 No 8

Antigravity

Space & Energy Technologies for the 21st Century

by the Disclosure Project’s
Theodore C. Loder, PhD

 

 

This paper reviews the development of antigravity research in the US and notes how research activity seemed to disappear by the mid-1950s. It then addresses recently reported scientific findings and witness testimonies — that show us that this research and technology is alive and well and very advanced. The revelations of findings in this area will alter dramatically our 20th century view of physics and technology and must be considered in planning for both energy and transportation needs in the 21st century.

Historical Background

Townsend Brown’s Technology of Electrogravitics[1]

In the mid 1920s, Townsend Brown[2] discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He found that when he charged a capacitor to a high voltage, it had a tendency to move toward its positive pole. This became known as the Biefeld-Brown effect. His findings were opposed by conventionally minded physicists of his time.

The Pearl Harbor Demonstration. Around 1953, Brown conducted a demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot-diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole. Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter classified.

Project Winterhaven. Brown submitted a proposal to the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc-shaped electrogravitic fighter craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents. They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test discs.

 

Review of Issues From the 1950s

Once Brown’s findings became well known, some scientists began to openly speak about the flying technology of UFOs, which had been observed extensively since the 1940s.

None other than Professor Hermann Oberth, considered by some to be one of the fathers of the space age (and who later worked in the US with Wernher von Braun, the Army Ballistic Missile Agency and NASA), stated the following in 1954:[3] “It is my thesis that flying saucers are real and that they are space ships from another solar system.”

Perhaps of more interest to our present discussion on propulsion, he then stated:

They are flying by the means of artificial fields of gravity. . . . They produce high-tension electric charges in order to push the air out of their paths, so it does not start glowing, and strong magnetic fields to influence the ionized air at higher altitudes. First, this would explain their luminosity . . . Secondly, it would explain the noiselessness of UFO flight.

We now know that he was fundamentally correct in his assessment.

In 1956, a British research company, Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. published a classified report on Electrogravitics Systems examining various aspects of gravity control. They summarized the pioneering work of Townsend Brown, and then described the use of electrogravitic thrust as follows:

 

The essence of electrogravitics thrust is the use of a very strong positive charge on one side of the vehicle and a negative on the other. The core of the motor is a condenser, and the ability of the condenser to hold its charge (the K-number) is the yardstick of performance. With air as 1, current dielectrical materials can yield 6 (and use of barium aluminate can raise this considerably); barium titanium oxide (a baked ceramic) can offer 6,000, and there is a promise of 30,000, which would be sufficient for supersonic speed.”[4]

In one of their conclusions, based on Brown’s work, Aviation Studies suggested: “Electrostatic energy sufficient to produce a Mach 3 fighter is possible with megavolt energies and a k of over 10,000.”[5]

In spite of Brown’s solid research, they later stated: “One of the difficulties in 1954 and 1955 was to get aviation to take electrogravitics seriously. The name alone was enough to put people off.”[6] It seems that this is as true today as it was in the 1950s.

A 1956 report by another British company, Gravity Rand, Ltd., agrees with this assessment and states: “To assert electrogravitics is nonsense is as unreal as to say it is practically extant. Management should be careful of men in their employ with a closed mind or even partially closed mind on the subject.”[7]

However, a trade press magazine, the Aviation Report, has made numerous references to antigravity projects, and listed many of the companies pursuing research in this area. Quotes from the Aviation Report listed in the Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. report[8] are suggestive of what was going on behind the scenes.

In 1954, they predicted: “. . . progress has been slow. But indications are now that the Pentagon is ready to sponsor a range of devices to help further knowledge,” and “Tentative targets now being set anticipate that the first disk should be complete before 1960, and it would take the whole of the ‘sixties to develop it properly, even though some combat things might be available ten years from now.” (Aviation Report 12 October 1954)[9]

During this time period many of the major defense and technology companies were cited as either having research projects or activities in this new field. For example: “Companies studying the implications of gravitics are said, in a new statement, to include Glenn Martin, Convair, Sperry-Rand, Sikorsky, Bell, Lear Inc., and Clark Electronics. Other companies who have previously evinced interest include Lockheed, Douglas, and Hiller.” (Aviation Report 9 December 1955)[10].

Others of these reports mention AT&T, General Electric, Curtiss-Wright, Boeing, and North American as having groups studying electrogravitics.

During the same time period, the Gravity Rand report notes: “Already, companies are specializing in evolution of particular components of an electogravitics disk.”[11]

However, in the area of predictions, the Aviation Report stated the following based on an extrapolation of technology development: “Thus this century will be divided into two parts — almost to the day. The first half belonged to the Wright Brothers who foresaw nearly all the basic issues in which gravity was the bitter foe. In part of the second half, gravity will be the great provider. Electrical energy, rather irrelevant for propulsion in the first half becomes a kind of catalyst to motion in the second half of the century.” (Aviation Report 7 September 1954).[12]

Looking back, it is easy to say that they missed the mark. But did they really miss it by a half a century? Reading through these reports it is quite obvious that there was much interest in antigravity among a number of very high-profile companies, as well as in the Department of Defense. What happened to this interest and why was it all downplayed during the following four plus decades? After all, T. Brown had shown that there was a demonstrable connection between high voltage fields and gravity. Why has it taken until the 1990s for more than just a few scientists to look at these results and publish on them in the open literature? A review of recent statements by former military personnel and civilians connected to covert projects begins to shed light on research activity in these areas over the last half century. And it appears that there had been significant breakthroughs during this time period, well shielded from both the scientific and public eye.

 

Recent Scientific Developments

In this section we consider developments in the antigravity field since the late 1980s and why the confluence of scientific findings and the testimony of witnesses associated with the military and covert groups indicates that a gravity solution with technological implications has been found.

Although general relativity has not been able to explain Brown’s electrogravitic observations, or any other antigravity phenomenon, the recent physics methodology of quantum electrodynamics (QED), appears to offer the theoretical framework to explain electrogravitic coupling. Recent papers by members of the Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation are putting a solid theoretical foundation onto the antigravity effects within the theory of electrodynamics and include papers by Evans[13] and Anastasozki et al.[14]

Earlier, in a 1994 breakthrough paper, Alcubierre showed that superluminal space travel is, in principle, physically possible and will not violate the tenets of the theory of relativity.[15] Puthoff later analyzed these findings in light of the present SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigms that insist that we could not be visited by extraterrestrial civilizations because of the speed-of-light limitations dictated by the general relativity theory.[16] He suggests that super-luminal travel is indeed possible. This leads to reduced-time interstellar travel and the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, which our limited understanding of physics and our scientific arrogance have “forbidden” in some sectors for most of the 20th century.

The second aspect of these physics findings deals with the zero-point or vacuum-state energy shown by the Casimir effect, which predicts that two metal plates close together attract each other due to imbalance in the quantum fluctuations. The implications of this zero-point or vacuum-state energy are tremendous and are described in several papers by Puthoff starting during the late 1980s.[17] A detailed bibliography on this and similar topics is available on the Internet.[18]

Bearden and colleagues have also written extensively on the theoretical physics of zero-point energy, and additionally have described various technological means of extracting this energy[19] (for example, see the recent paper by Anastasozki et al.[20]). A theoretical book on zero-point energy by Bearden will soon be available.[21] There is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about this energy, but that its existence and potential use have been discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or more.[22]

The coupling of the electrogravitic phenomena observations and the zero-point energy findings are leading to a new understanding of the nature of both matter and gravity. This is just now being discussed in scientific journals (though some evidence suggests that it has been understood for decades within the Black Project covert community). The question that is being addressed is: What keeps the universe running? Or, more specifically, Where do electrons get their energy to keep spinning around atoms? As electrons change state they absorb or release energy, and where does it come from? The simplistic answer is that it is coming from the vacuum state.

Puthoff describes the process as follows:

 

I discovered that you can consider the electron as continually radiating away its energy as predicted by classical theory, but SIMULTANEOUSLY ABSORBING a COMPENSATING AMOUNT of energy from the ever-present sea of zero-point energy in which the atom is immersed. An equilibrium between these two processes leads to the correct values for the parameters that define the lowest energy, or ground-state orbit [see “Why atoms don’t collapse,” New Scientist, July 1987]. Thus, there is a DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM in which the zero-point energy stabilizes the electron in a set ground-state orbit. It seems that the very stability of matter itself appears to depend on an underlying sea of electromagnetic zero-point energy.[23]

Furthermore, it appears that it is the spinning of electrons that provides inertia and mass to atoms. These theories, linking electron spin, zero-point energy, mass, and inertia have been presented in a number of recent papers, such as those by Haisch and colleagues, and provide us with a possible explanation of the Biefield-Brown effect.[24] It appears that an intense voltage field creates an electromagnetic barrier that blocks the atomic structure of an atom from interacting with the zero-point field. This slows down the electrons, reducing their gyroscopic effect, and thus reducing atomic mass and inertia, making them easier to move around.

 

Evidence of Extensive Antigravity Technology

The B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber

In 1993, LaViolette wrote a paper discussing the B-2 bomber and speculating on its probable antigravity propulsion system,[25] based on a solid understanding of electrogravitics, the aircraft’s design, and the materials used in its manufacture.[26] It appears that the craft is using a sophisticated form of the antigravity principles first described by T. Brown.

Support for this thesis came from Aviation Week and Space Technology (March 9, 1992), which reported that the B-2 bomber electrostatically charges its leading edge and its exhaust stream. Their information had come from a small group of former Black Project research scientists and engineers suggesting that the B-2 utilizes antigravity technology. This information was supported by Bob Oechsler, an ex-NASA mission specialist who had publicly made a similar claim in 1990. These findings support the contention that there have been major developments in the area of antigravity propulsion which are presently being applied in advanced aircraft.

LaViolette later states the obvious: “The commercial airline industry could dramatically benefit with this technology, which would not only substantially increase the miles-per-gallon fuel efficiency of jet airliners, but would also permit high-speed flight that would dramatically cut flight time.”[27]

 

The Disclosure Project Witnesses

On May 9, 2001, The Disclosure Project[28] held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. They presented nearly two dozen witnesses, including retired Army, Navy, and Air Force personnel, a top FAA official, members of various intelligence organizations including the CIA and NRO (National Reconnaissance Organization), and industry personnel, all of whom who had witnessed UFO events or had inside knowledge of government or industrial activities in this area. They also produced a briefing document for members of the press and Congress,[29] and a book which includes the testimony of nearly 70 such witnesses from a pool of hundreds.[30] Although they all spoke of the reality of the UFO phenomena, many also spoke of covert projects dealing with antigravity, zero-point energy technologies, and development of alien reproduction vehicles (ARV’s) by US Black Project and covert interests. The following excerpted quotes from these witnesses support the contentions in this article.

Dan Morris

Morris is a retired Air Force career Master Sergeant who was involved in the extraterrestrial projects for many years.[31] After leaving the Air Force, he was recruited into the super-secret NRO, during which time he worked specifically on extraterrestrial-connected operations. He had a cosmic top-secret clearance (38 levels above top secret) which, he stated, no US president, to his knowledge, has ever held.

 

UFOs are both extraterrestrial and man made. Well, the guys that were doing the UFOs, they weren’t sleeping, and Townsend Brown was one of our guys who was almost up with the Germans. So we had a problem. We had to keep Townsend Brown — what he was doing on antigravity electromagnetic propulsion — secret.

Morris then describes a type of zero-point energy device.

 

Well, if you have one of these units that’s about sixteen inches long and about eight inches high and about ten inches wide, then you don’t need to plug into the local electric company. These devices burn nothing. No pollution. It never wears out, because there are no moving parts. What moves are electrons, in the gravity field, in the electronic field, and they turn in opposite directions, okay?

“Dr. B.”

Dr. B.’s name was withheld because he still works in this area. He is a scientist and engineer who has worked on top-secret projects almost all his life. Over the years he has directly worked on or had involvement with top-secret projects involving antigravity, chemical warfare, secure telemetry and communications, extremely high-energy space-based laser systems, and electromagnetic pulse technology. He testified:

 

Anti-gravity. As a matter of fact, I used to go out to the Hughes in Malibu. They had a big think tank up there. Big antigravity projects; I used to talk to them out there. I’d give them ideas, because they bought all my equipment. But the American public will never, never hear about that. . . . This flying disc has a little plutonium reactor in it, which creates electricity, which drives these antigravity plates. We also have the next level of propulsion, it is called virtual field, which are called hydrodynamic waves.[32]

Captain Bill Uhouse

Captain Uhouse served ten years in the Marine Corps as a fighter pilot, and four years with the Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB as a civilian doing flight-testing of exotic experimental aircraft.[1] Later, for the next 30 years, he worked for defense contractors as an engineer of antigravity propulsion systems — on flight simulators for exotic aircraft, and on actual flying discs.[33]

 

I don’t think any flying disc simulators went into operation until the early 1960s — around 1962 or 1963. The reason why I am saying this is because the simulator wasn’t actually functional until around 1958. The simulator that they used was for the extraterrestrial craft they had, which is a 30-meter one that crashed in Kingman, Arizona, back in 1953 or 1952.

. . . We operated it with six large capacitors that were charged with a million volts each, so there were six million volts in those capacitors. . . . There weren’t any windows. The only way we had any visibility at all was done with cameras or video-type devices. . . . Over the last 40 years or so, not counting the simulators — I’m talking about actual craft — there are probably two or three dozen, and various sizes that we built.

A.H.

A.H., formally of Boeing Aerospace, is a person who has gained significant information from inside the UFO extraterrestrial groups within our government, military, and civilian companies.[34] He has friends at the NSA, CIA, NASA, JPL, ONI, NRO, Area 51, the Air Force, Northrup, Boeing, and others.

 

Most of the craft operate on antigravity and electrogravitic propulsion. We are just about at the conclusion state right now regarding antigravity. I would give it maybe about 15 years and we will have cars that will levitate using this type of technology. We’re doing it up at Area 51 right now. That’s some of the stuff that my buddy worked on up at Area 51 with Northrup, who lives now in Pahrump, Nevada. We’re flying antigravity vehicles up there and in Utah right now.

Lieutenant Colonel Williams

Lieutenant Williams entered the Air Force in 1964 and became a rescue helicopter pilot in Vietnam.[35] He has an electrical engineering degree and was in charge of all the construction projects for the Military Air Command. During his time in the military he knew that there was a facility inside of Norton Air Force Base in California that no one was to know about.

 

There was one facility at Norton Air Force Base that was close hold — not even the Wing Commander there could know what was going on. During that time period it was always rumored by the pilots that that was a cover for in fact the location of one UFO craft.

Note that all he knew was of the rumor. However, it is confirmed by the next testimony, which also confirms some of the comments made by Captain Uhouse.

Mark McCandlish

McCandlish is an accomplished aerospace illustrator and has worked for many of the top aerospace corporations in the United States.[36] A colleague with whom he studied has been inside a facility at Norton Air Force Base, where he witnessed alien reproduction vehicles, or ARVs, that were fully operational and hovering. He states that the US not only has operational antigravity propulsion devices, but that we have had them for many, many years, and that they have been developed through the study, in part, of extraterrestrial vehicles over the past fifty years.

A close friend, Brad Sorensen, told him of visiting The Big Hangar during an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12, 1988, and how he had seen flying saucers in this hangar.

 

There were three flying saucers floating off the floor — no cables suspended from the ceiling holding them up, no landing gear underneath, just floating — hovering above the floor. He said that the smallest was somewhat bell-shaped. They were all identical in shape and proportion, except that there were three different sizes. They had little exhibits, with a videotape running, showing the smallest of the three vehicles sitting out in the desert, presumably over a dry lakebed, some place like Area 51. It showed this vehicle making three little quick, hopping motions; then [it] accelerated straight up and out of sight, completely disappearing from view in just a couple of seconds — no sound, no sonic boom-nothing.

. . . Well, this craft was what they called the Alien Reproduction Vehicle; it was also nicknamed the Flux Liner. This antigravity propulsion system — this flying saucer — was one of three that were in this hangar at Norton Air Force Base. [Its] synthetic vision system [used] the same kind of technology as the gun slaving system they have in the Apache helicopter: if [the pilot] wants to look behind him, he can pick a view in that direction, and the cameras slew in pairs. [The pilot] has a little screen in front of his helmet, and it gives him an alternating view. He [also] has a little set of glasses that he wears — in fact, you can actually buy a 3-D viewing system for your video camera now that does this same thing — so when he looks around, he has a perfect 3-D view of the outside, but no windows. So, why do they have no windows? Well, it’s probably because the voltages that we’re talking about [being] used in this system were probably something between, say, half a million and a million volts of electricity.

Brad Sorensen stated that at the ARV display, “a three star general said that these vehicles were capable of doing light speed or better.”

 

These witness testimonies do not prove the existence of a successful US covert program in antigravity technologies. Only the demonstration of such craft, coupled with the accompanying government and technical specification documents, would prove this. However, these testimonies, coupled with information from other substantial sources such as Nick Cook’s new book mentioned below, strongly supports this contention.

The Hunt for Zero Point

This very recent book (August, 2001), which just became available in the US, contains some of the strongest evidence yet for major efforts and success in the field of antigravity technology.[37] The author, Nick Cook, who for the past 15 years has been the aviation editor and aerospace consultant for Jane’s Defense Weekly, spent the last 10 years collecting information for the book. This included archival research on Nazi Germany’s antigravity technology and interviews with top officials at NASA, the Pentagon, and secret defense installations. He shows that America has cracked the gravity code and classified the information at the highest security levels.

Because antigravity and its allied zero-point energy technologies potentially offer the world a future of unlimited, non-polluting energy it has been suppressed because of the “huge economic threat.” His findings support those reported by many of the Disclosure Project witnesses cited above.

 

Antigravity Technology Demonstrations

Although T. Brown reported many of his findings nearly a half century ago, other experimenters have just recently begun to reproduce his work and report it in the open literature and on the worldwide web. For example, Davenport published the results of his work in 1995 supporting the findings of T. Brown.[38] More recently, Transdimensional Technologies in the USA[39] and J. Naudin[40] labs in France have posted diagrams, web videos, and data on their versions of antigravity “Lifters” based on an extension of Brown’s work.

It is a sad commentary on this whole area of research to see that public science is requiring us to demonstrate principles that were demonstrated nearly fifty years ago.

There have also been a number of other demonstrations of antigravity phenomena by researchers throughout the world. This includes the work of Brazilian physics professor Fran De Aquino, and such devices as the Searl Electrogravity Disc, the Podkletnov Gravity Shield and Project Greenglow, the Zinsser Kineto-baric Field Propulsion, and the Woodward Field Thrust Experiments on Piezoelectrics. All of these are described in more detail by Greer and Loder.[41]

 

Implications of This Research

    1. Antigravity and zero point energy research and their applications are finally being addressed by some of the open scientific community. This means there will have to be a rewriting of textbooks in this area so our new generation of students can apply this “new knowledge.” Its application will lead to major breakthroughs in transportation technologies both earthside and in outer space. The implications are that we have the potential for human exploration of our solar system and beyond, if we have the will, within our lifetimes. It also means that the majority of 20th century space technology will be obsolete and in fact may already be so.
    1. The zero point or vacuum state energy source is seen as a totally non-polluting energy source, which has the potential to replace all the fossil fuels on this planet. It also will provide the energy needed for long range space flights. This means that fuel cells and solar cells in common use today for space flight energy applications will only be needed until we transition to these new energy technologies.
    1. Based on an analysis of trends in antigravity research over the last half-century and the information provided by numerous witnesses, it appears that there is both good and bad news. The good news is that it appears that we (at least covert projects) have already developed the theories of antigravity, and additionally have developed working spacecraft based on these principles. The bad news is that these technologies have been developed for at least several decades, at the public’s expense and that human kind has been deprived of these technologies, while continuing to waste energy using less efficient and pollution enhancing technologies.Supporting this contention is the following quote from Ben Rich, former head of the Lockheed Skunkworks. Just prior to his death, he stated to a small group after a lecture: “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity…” He went on to say, “Anything you can imagine we already know how to do.” Strong words from a knowledgeable deep insider and words that support what a number of the witnesses stated as well.
    1. As the reality of this knowledge begins to be understood, there will be an outcry among space scientists not on the inside for release of these technologies to allow all of us to explore space. There will be major changes in the way that NASA does its business, though predicting these changes is difficult.
    1. Not only has space exploration in the public sector suffered, but our planet’s environment has suffered as well. Thus as this knowledge begins to sink in there will be an outcry among all concerned citizens on this planet for release of these technologies to allow all of us to reduce and ultimately eliminate global warming and environmental pollution that so threatens our way of life. These technologies will not only affect space travel technologies, but will also have a profound effect on transportation and energy production on the earth’s surface.

In Conclusion

To summarize this discussion, we might consider the observation made by Halton Arp:

 

We are certainly not at the end of science. . . . Most probably we are just at the beginning![42]

Dr. Theodore C. Loder is a professor of estuarine/coastal chemistry at the University of New Hampshire. Outside the realm of bringing free energy and the new physics to our technology, his main interests are in the chemical oceanography of the coastal region. At present, he has several students working with him in this area, all of whose master’s theses are concerned with multidisciplinary projects representing efforts of scientists from at least eight different institutions. His email address is Ted.Loder@unh.edu.

Dr. Loder wishes to acknowledge his debt to others “for many discussions while preparing and writing this paper, including: S. Greer, A. Craddock, T. Bearden, P. LaViolette, M. McCandlish, D. Hamilton, T. Valone, E. Mallove, T. Loder, C. Loder, S. Patel, and many of the courageous Disclosure Project witnesses.”

 

 

Table of Contents                 Top of Page                  Home

SOURCE: http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar2/loder.htm

+++

Antigravity: Reverse Engineering of UFOs

with Theodore C. Loder, PhD

by Wynn Free

Professor Ted Loder, a well known researcher in the earth sciences, has had a life-long interest in UFO phenomena and related energy issues. His serious study of these issues began in the mid-1990s, when he learned from a trusted government informant that UFOs were real.

Loder works closely with Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project (see The Disclosure Project Today), and is dedicated to bringing the truth about UFOs to the general public.

The following interview was conducted at the February 2003 13th Annual UFO Congress.

Wynn: Ted, why were you invited to speak at a UFO convention?

Ted: It goes back to a year and a half go, when I was invited to present a paper at a meeting of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). This is a group of rocket scientists who are working on the concept of getting space colonization started — for example, a colony on the Moon, a colony on Mars, maybe a space station.

Wynn: Are you a rocket scientist?

Ted: No, my background is oceanography. But I’ve worked with the Disclosure Project and Dr. Greer for about six years now. I was involved in the Disclosure Projects press briefings and the National Press Club in May 2001, and I co-wrote with Dr. Greer the 500-page document that was handed out to the press, senators, and congressmen.

When I was invited to speak to the engineers at the AIAA, I thought at first that I was supposed to give a talk. But then they insisted that I write a paper, with documents and footnotes. That paper was called “Outside the Box: Space and Terrestrial Transportation and Energy Technologies for the 21st century.” It went back to the 1950s, with research done by various people, but then I went fast forward to the Disclosure Project.

I wrote about multiple military and industrial witnesses who had described the retrieval of extraterrestrial craft and the reverse engineering of extraterrestrial technology. It was basically a scientific history review paper, documented with all kinds of references that can be checked.

It proved that by the 1960s, through coupling the ET technology with our own knowledge of science and physics, our government had produced functioning antigravity craft.

Wynn: Our government?

Ted: “Our government” is a dicey way to describe it. This is really a coupling of private industry and the military. So it’s technically our government — but in reality, our elected government doesn’t know what’s going on. Because of defense-related issues, this sort of information is the closest kept secret there is, perhaps even more secret than the UFO issue itself.

Wynn: Is there documentation as to this reverse engineering.

Ted: Yes. Multiple witnesses talk about this in the Disclosure Book. These are guys who are captains of the Air Force and members of the NRO, plus Boeing scientists and other private scientists.

So the paper I wrote was a compilation of what these various witnesses were saying. Then I went to what the scientific literature has been doing over the last fifteen years and investigated the coupling of quantum mechanics and the zero-point energy field. Physicists are starting to look at the relationship between gravity, inertia, energy fields and EMF (radio wave) fields. They’re starting to couple these things together and are finding they are all related.

If you take the research going on in the hard-core physics area together with what these scientists are saying and what Thomas Townsend-Brown was saying fifty years ago, the story emerges that not only is antigravity real, but — based on reverse engineering and our own science — we’ve figured it out and have created working antigravity craft.

In its conclusions, my paper dealt with the implications of this knowledge — because it’s starting to leak out.

In summary, there is a change in the way we teach physics, in the way we do science, in how we go to space, and in the implications of antigravity research coupled with zero-point energy technologies. Extracting energy from the vacuum means we have a whole new way of doing things.

The depressing thing is that for forty years we could have been transporting people without using fossil fuels to push 100-year-old technology around the sky. For forty years, we have had antigravity technologies that would supersede Boeing’s air buses and all of the other aircraft that are polluting our environment, using up fossil fuels, creating global warming, and contaminating and polluting the upper atmosphere and stratosphere.

So there are a lot of things going on. The interesting thing about this paper is that it kind of took on a life of its own. I was able to give copies of the paper to various high-level aerospace people who were on the committee, including Buzz Aldrin, the astronaut.

The paper was on the Disclosure Project website. We put it on the Seas Power website, which is about zero-point energy. Dr. Thomas Valone put it on his Integrity Research Institute website. And of course Drunvalo Melchizedek put it on Spirit of Ma’at[see the March 2002 issue on free energy at AntiGravity: Space and Energy Technologies for the 21st Century].

Yesterday, I was in Albuquerque at a staff meeting of the Space Colonization technical committee at the Space Technologies International Forum. This committee meets once a year, and I presented a follow-up to my paper. During one of the break sessions, I was talking to a chap who was with the Department of Defense, and I asked him if he had heard my talk. He said that he had. I asked if he had seen my earlier paper, which I passed out at the AIAA meeting last year in Reno, and he said no. So I pulled out a copy from my briefcase and showed it to him. He said, “Oh, you’re the one who wrote this paper. I’ve read this twice, and you’re right on target.” He’s a very high-level person, and it’s interesting to hear that people who are in the know are getting this paper and agreeing with it. These people can’t speak out publicly about the reality of what I’m saying.

Wynn: So do we actually have antigravity aircraft right at this moment? And if so, is it being used functionally, or is it just experimental?

Ted: There’s a lot of evidence that the B-2 bomber is antigravity assisted. Of course the Department of Defense and the Air force will say nothing about this, but the leading edge of the B-2 is positively charged, and the aft is negatively charged. Townsend-Brown showed in the 1920s that if you take an asymmetric capacitor and charge it to a high voltage, it will move in the direction of the positive charge. He had patents on this called the Bifield/Brown effect. That information came out in the 1950s — and disappeared. I talk about that in my paper. It’s only been in the last few years that people started repeating these experiments. You can now buy kits called lifter kits. They are balsa/aluminum foil devices that will rise off the ground.

Wynn: Anybody can buy these?

Ted: Anybody can. For under fifty dollars you can buy kits at Information Unlimited [there is also an instructinal CD available at the American Antigravity website — ed.]. You can make your own antigravity device.

Wynn: Can you explain in simple terms how this antigravity principle works?

Ted: I wish I knew the answer to that question. I don’t know the physics details of it. Tom Beardon wrote a 900-page book called Energy from the Vacuum that’s about the science of free energy, zero-point energy, and antigravity. He’s one of the leading people in the world on that subject.

The interesting thing is that there are a number of people making these lifters. Jean-Louis Naudin, in France, has been researching and reproducing them and reporting the results at his website JNAudin.free.fr. They’ve just built one that’s huge enough to lift a live mouse in a cage. The more cells you have, the more lift.

Wynn: So it’s not expensive to do this?

Ted: Not just to demonstrate it.

Mark McCandlish, one of our Disclosure Project witnesses, had a very close colleague, Brad Sorenson, who described visiting an air show at one of the major hangers at Norton Air force Base in the late 1980s. A high-end person from the government got him in there. He said he’d seen three antigravity working crafts hanging above the floor in the hanger, all domed shaped and looking like UFOs.

Wynn: Is there any fuel required to move these craft?

Ted: No, no fuel.

Wynn: But there’s fuel required to propel it?

Ted: The B-2 bomber takes off using standard jets, but once it’s airborne they can switch to this antigravity propulsion, which is actually helping to push it forward. It can push down, which makes it go up, or it can push sideways, which makes it go forward. So the B-2 bomber, from what I’ve read — I don’t have personal evidence of this — makes use of this technology.

These lifters are basically demonstrating the principle of the asymmetrical capacitor or what’s called the Biefeld-Brown effect. You have a high dielectric material between two metal plates — one charged negative and one charged positive — and it moves in the direction of the positive charge.

The interesting thing is that the Army published a major research report on this effect last November. The Army talks about how it “might be” working, and they’ve built some demonstration models. NASA got a patent in 2001 on asymmetrical capacitance motion, and never mentioned Biefeld-Brown. So they didn’t give credit where credit was due.

The depressing thing is that this is being done in the “white” world, with various papers published on the web, based on something Brown demonstrated fifty years ago! There’s been a fifty-year hiatus of research on this technology.

Wynn: How did you get from oceanography to antigravity?

Ted: I’m a scientist. I’ve spent the last thirty years as a professor, doing research, having graduate students, teaching courses in the field of oceanography… that’s been my “day job.” And I was pretty skeptical about extraterrestrial contact.

But then I started talking to these people on the Disclosure Project, and witness after witness after witness was saying that they were on crash retrieval programs, picking up “UFOs.” They were saying that yes, they’d built simulators for these things in the early 1960s so they could simulate what was going on. Yes, they built these multi-million-volt capacitors to give them the lift to try these things. Yes, back in the early 1960s they were testing these things. So I thought, “We’ve been held ransom for forty years or more, while the environment’s been going to hell in a handbasket.” And so I decided I needed to piece this together.

So getting back to your first question as to how I got to this meeting at this UFO Congress. I gave this paper to the AIAA meeting, and then Tom Valone invited me to talk about this paper at another meeting, and Bob Brown — who puts on this meeting — was present and invited me to come here. So here I am.

Wynn: Could you explain something about the Disclosure Project’s mission?

Ted: The goal of the Disclosure Project and CSETI — the Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence — was at first to inform our legal government about the reality of extraterrestrial and UFO information and knowledge.

In the early 1990s, Dr. Greer briefed people at the United Nations, the director of the CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as a number of senators and representatives. By the mid-1990s, he had put together a meeting of some American astronauts, Russian cosmonauts, high-level military people, and civilian witnesses to talk about how to bring this information out to the public. He could see, as we all have seen now, that this information has been kept under wraps for fifty-plus years since Roswell and World War Two. The coverup has gone on under several generations of people.

And the technologies associated with that coverup are going to be needed to save the planetary environment. We also need these technologies in terms of the global political structure, because part of the problem right now is that there are major haves and major have-nots, and it all boils down to energy. If you’re an energy-poor country, such as India or China or much of Africa, you could never become a First World country.

But the First World countries — the United States, Europe, and Japan — make up only 600 million out of 6 billion people, or 12 percent of the world’s population. And the rest will never make it, because they’ll never have the energy. The oil and gas energy just isn’t available, and it never will be available at the levels we’re using it.

The energy technologies and the other technologies associated with the ET issues are very important. Covert military groups are attempting, or succeeding, to actually shoot down extraterrestrial craft that are visiting the planet. Yet these craft that are observing us and watching us are basically on our side. They are helping us to make sure we don’t blow ourselves up.

Wynn: Do you think that ETs are positive in general? Or do you think that some are positive and some are negative?

Ted: The general sense of a lot of people is that they are both positive and negative. The sense that Dr. Greer and myself have, from our own experience, is that they are positive. That doesn’t mean they’re all perfect. There are encounters with people. But the covert military itself is responsible for a vast amount of the abductions that people talk about. If someone has a real encounter with ETs, the military will often follow that up with their own abduction to confuse the person.

If you talk to abductees, you’ll find that’s often the case. Our interactions have been positive and supportive. Until the planet gets itself together in terms of understanding this, we’re in trouble.

We’re planning on another war in the Middle East — not we, but our elected government, which is all about oil and about power and greed. But if we didn’t depend on fossil fuels, that would change the dynamics greatly. So one of the things we are working on is to change those dynamics.

It’s not going to happen overnight. There’s going to be a transition period.

Wynn: Could we say that it’s greed that’s stopped this from happening?

Ted: Total greed. And all the rationale that the people couldn’t take it because it would screw up their religions, or the people would be too scared. We’ve been conditioned for the past decades that UFOs exist, although the government continues to deny it. The Disclosure Project was probably a strong force in this because it had solid military witnesses with government documents to back up what they were saying. It wasn’t Joe Blow out a Saturday night with a couple of six packs seeing something in the sky. These are military people with solid military records.

One pilot who had his own encounters when he was flying for the Air Force told me that although he was trusted enough to be certified to carry nuclear weapons, if he saw a UFO and reported it they would say he was crazy. So there’s a disconnect in how these things are looked at.

We also find that some of the major religions, such as the Catholics, have been speaking out about the reality of UFOs. Monsignor Balducci, who is in the Disclosure Book as one of our witnesses, talks about that — from a high level in the Vatican! So the excuse that the people of the world would go crazy if they learned we weren’t the only people around, or that the religions would take a hit, and so on, is really just noise to cover up the real reason. Which is greed.

In 1997, when Dr. Greer put together a closed briefing for congressional members and the White House staff, we hoped that the members of the Senate and the House would have enough guts to hold hearings on the UFO issue. We offered 500-plus witnesses who had agreed to come forward, people on the inside. But the public UFO hearings have not happened.

So we’ve been very disappointed in the White House and Congress, who both know that this is real. But after that 1997 briefing, we realized that the only way to get this story out was to bring it to the public. That’s when we put together the Disclosure Project and the briefing at the National Press Club in May of 2001.

Wynn: Do you know where these ETs come from?

Ted: There are multiple races from multiple star systems and planets. I have no personal evidence where they are from, so I’ll leave it at that.

Wynn: Do their craft travel faster than the speed of light?

Ted: Yes, they do. They travel in a way that bypasses the speed-of-light limitation. By the way, a Brazillian scientist, Miguel Alcubierre, wrote a scientific paper in 1994 showing that there actually is no limitation to the speed of light in the relativity theories of present physics see The Warp Drive: Hyper-Fast Travel Within General Relativity).

There are books by people who have claimed to be on extraterrestrial craft. They talk about the subtle shifting into a slightly different dimension and literally traveling between star systems in a matter of weeks.***

Wynn: This sounds like Star Trek.

Ted: It’s kind of the real equivalent of warp drive. And I would guess that there’s more than one way to do it. This is why there have been so many reports of people seeing ET craft. In Belgium, in the early 1990s, people were seeing huge craft shrinking down to a ball of light and then taking off, or sometimes disappearing.

It would be possible for there to be an extraterrestrial craft in this room with us and we wouldn’t know it. You could see it if you had celestial vision or could see beyond the veil of light, which some people can do, just as some people see ghosts or auras. It’s in that realm.

We humans are wired for some of that technology, which why some people can see into that form. The speed-of-light issue, which is used by hard core linear scientists who don’t want this issue to come out, basically holds that the closest star is four light years away, and that there’s no way people would spend eight years traveling back and forth, so therefore we can’t be visited.

But physicists are starting to admit in the open literature that there are ways around this limitation. So maybe this is a good place to end.

Wynn: Thank you for sharing with our readers.

Ted: Thank you.

SOURCE: http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar3/loder.htm

+++

See also: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vida_alien/alien_contact56.htm

+++

+++

See also: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/03/08/quantum-vacuum-zero-point-energy-access-is-free-energy-for-all-actually-possible/

+++

Apparently, “spiritofmaat” is Drunvalo Melchizedek.

http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/mar2/toc.htm

http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/

+++

 

We — a dystopian novel by Yevgeny Zamyatin

August 6, 2017

Rosettasister's Weblog

wecover

dystopia

Origin:
1865–70; dys- + (u)topiahttp://psychicgraffiti.blogspot.com/2007/07/yevgeny-zamyatins-we-first-dystopian.html

We (Russian: Мы) is a dystopian novel by Yevgeny Zamyatin completed in 1921.

It was written in response to the author’s personal experiences with the Russian revolutions of 1905 and 1917, his life in the Newcastle suburb of Jesmond and work in the Tyne shipyards at nearby Wallsend during the First World War. It was on Tyneside that he observed the rationalization of labour on a large scale.

The first English translation of We was published in 1924.

… it is not necessary to be intimately familiar with the totalitarian political structure of Stalin’s Russia to feel the full impact of We. Instead, the clarity of this book’s language and the amazing characterization and plotting carry the reader into a world both absurd and nightmarish, transcending what must have been…

View original post 186 more words