One night with you
One dream come true
One love no man can deny
The good in your eye

One life undone
One song unsung
My world of fire and ice
Become paradise
Elysium come true in loving you

One angel of man
Giving me wings to a promised land
Leaving the world behind

One night with you
One sky come blue
One night no rhymes can reveal
The heaven I feel
Elysium come true in loving you


From Serg1974

See more here:


105 Responses to “Gino”

  1. Tenacity Says:

    The show will be Let’s Talk Liberty @ 9 Eastern Time, 7 Mountain Time.

  2. Tenacity Says:

    That would be Thursday evening and is a show hosted by Chalice.

    So Where is everybody. You are never alone at Rose’s Place.

    After the 8:30 MDT break, we will take calls at 347-215-6929.

  3. Tenacity Says:

    Oh yes…no handle, I will be hosting as the living breathing sovereign me.

  4. ryansgrammy Says:

    From Drudge — I loved this article regarding Hsu — the crooked campaign contributor who gave lots to Hillary, Feinstein, Richardson & others. It said that these politicians won’t be in trouble because they didn’t know Hsu was a crook. What a joke — these guys are all crooks themselves. Oh the hipocrisy of it all!!!!!

  5. ryansgrammy Says:

    I guess the link would help

  6. jrinNC Says:

    Do you know the Preamble for your state? . .

    I found this very interesting. I am wondering why the ACLU has not attacked these.

    Please contact your state government officials and tell them to re-read their state constitutions and to conduct their business accordingly.

    Alabama 1901, Preamble
    We the people of the State of Alabama , invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution..

    Alaska 1956, Preamble We, the people of Alaska , grateful to God and to those who founded our nation and pioneered this great land.

    Arizona 1911, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arizona , grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution…
    Arkansas 1874, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arkansas , grateful to Almighty God for the privilege of choosing our own form of government…

    California 1879, Preamble We, the People of the State of California , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom…

    Colorado 1876, Preamble We, the people of Colorado , with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of Universe…

    Connecticut 1818, Preamble. The People of Connecticut, acknowledging with gratitude the good Providence of God in permitting them to enjoy.

    Delaware 1897, Preamble Through Divine Goodness all men have, by nature, the rights of worshipping and serving their Creator according to the dictates of their consciences…

    Florida 1885, Preamble We, the people of the State of Florida , grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty, establish this Constitution…

    Georgia 1777, Preamble We, the people of Georgia , relying upon protection and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this Constitution….

    Hawaii 1959, Preamble We , the people of Hawaii , Grateful for Divine Guidance … Establish this Constitution.

    Idaho 1889, Preamble We, the people of the State of Idaho , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings.

    Illinois 1870, Preamble We, the people of the State of Illinois, grateful to Almighty God for the civil , political and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors.

    Indiana 1851, Preamble We, the People of the State of Indiana , grateful to Almighty God for the free exercise of the right to choose our form of government.

    Iowa 1857, Preamble We, the People of the St ate of Iowa , grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of these blessings, establish this Constitution.

    Kansas 1859, Preamble We, the people of Kansas , grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious privileges establish this Constitution.

    Kentucky 1891, Preamble.. We, the people of the Commonwealth are grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties..

    Louisiana 1921, Preamble We, the people of the State of Louisiana , grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties we enjoy.

    Maine 1820, Preamble We the People of Maine acknowledging with grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe in affording us an opportunity .. And imploring His aid and direction.

    Maryland 1776, Preamble We, the people of the state of Maryland , grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberty…

    Massachusetts 1780, Preamble We…the people of Massachusetts, acknowledging with grateful hearts, the goodness of the Great Legislator of the Universe In the course of His Providence, an opportunity and devoutly imploring His direction

    Michigan 1908, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Michigan , grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of freedom, establish this Constitution..

    Minnesota, 1857, Preamble We, the people of the State of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings:

    Mississippi 1890, Preamble We, the people of Mississippi in convention assembled, grateful to Almighty God, and invoking His blessing on our work.

    Missouri 1845, Preamble We, the people of Missouri , with profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, and grateful for His goodness . Establish this Constitution…

    Montana 1889, Preamble. We, the people of Montana , grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of liberty establish this Constitution …

    Nebraska 1875, Preamble We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom . Establish this Constitution.

    Nevada 1864, Preamble We the people of the State of Nevada , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, establish this Constitution…

    New Hampshire 1792, Part I. Art. I. Sec. V Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience.

    New Jersey 1844, Preamble We, the people of the State of New Jersey, grateful to Almighty God for civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors.

    New Mexico 1911, Preamble We, the People of New Mexico, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of liberty..

    New York 1846, Preamble We, the people of the State of New York , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings.

    North Carolina 1868, Preamble We the people of the State of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for our civil, political, and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those…

    North Dakota 1889, Preamble We , the people of North Dakota , grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, do ordain….

    Ohio 1852, Preamble We the people of the state of Ohio , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings and to promote our common.

    Oklahoma 1907, Preamble Invoking the guidance of Almighty God, in order to secure and perpetuate the blessings of liberty, establish this

    Oregon 1857, Bill of Rights, Article I Section 2. All men shall be secure in the Natural right, to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences

    Pennsylvania 1776, Preamble We, the people of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance….

    Rhode Island 1842, Preamble. We the People of the State of Rhode Island grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing…

    South Carolina , 1778, Preamble We, the people of he State of South Carolina grateful to God for our liberties, do ordain and establish this Constitution.

    South Dakota 1889, Preamble We, the people of South Dakota , grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberties …

    Tennessee 1796, Art. XI…III. That all men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their conscience…

    Texas 1845, Preamble We the People of the Republic of Texas , acknowledging, with gratitude, the grace and beneficence of God.
    Utah 1896, Preamble Grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty, we establish this Constitution.

    Vermont 1777, Preamble Whereas all government ought to enable the individuals who compose it to enjoy their natural rights, and other blessings which the Author of Existence has bestowed on man ..

    Virginia 1776, Bill of Rights, XVI Religion, or the Duty which we owe our Creator can be directed only by Reason and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian Forbearance, Love and Charity towards each other

    Washington 1889, Preamble We the People of the State of Washington, grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution

    West Virginia 1872, Preamble Since through Divine Providence we enjoy the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the people of West Virginia reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance upon God ..

    Wisconsin 1848, Preamble We, the people of Wisconsin , grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, domestic tranquility…

    Wyoming 1890, Preamble We, the people of the State of Wyoming , grateful to God for our civil, political, and religious liberties, establish this Constitution…

    So much for Obama saying while in Turkey : “We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.” I think he needs a history lesson before he opens his mouth.

  7. CJ Says:

    Got this email and thought it was appropriate.












  8. rosettasister Says:

    Found at Hugh Hewitt

    “Comparative Effectiveness”

    On yesterday’s program I played a clip of Professor Stuart Altman’s testimony before a Senate committee meeting devoted to the radical restructuring of health care. Professor Altman got perilously close to candor:

    “People are using technologies that really don’t work at all or keep people alive for very limited or very high costs, hospice is one option, but we do need to take account of the costs, ya know, I hate to say it, the cost benefits of some of the things we do.”

  9. rosettasister Says:

  10. rosettasister Says:

  11. rosettasister Says:

    Weird and Wacky Stuff!

    Sound Energy

    Part One

    Part Two

    Part Three

    Australian scientist: “In these 2009 progressions of crop patterns so far, it seems like the circlemakers are describing a combined ‘solar flare and coronal mass ejection’ on the apogee full Moon of July 7, 2009. The May 9, 2009, pattern at Peak’s Down (apogee-perigee) seems to suggest that several CMEs might pass as close to Earth as lunar orbit.”

  12. LadyTexan Says:

    Ya gotta admire Larry Sinclair’s boldness.


  13. rosettasister Says:

    Thanks, Lady!

    You know Larry is right.

    Gay men like Perez Hilton make all gay men look bad.

  14. rosettasister Says:

    A “No” Vote Grows In California, And What It Means For Obama/Pelosi/Reid Rationing

    The experience in California gives me hope for the coming battle.

    The Obama/Pelosi/Reid coalition of those willing to let other people die in the cause of lowering health care costs will try and sell the radical restructuring as other than it is –which is rationing.

    In so doing they will be repeating Arnold’s mistake of contempt for the electorate.

    Even though the MSM in California is nearly as craven in its coverage of the propositions as the MSM in the Beltway has been in its coverage of Obama, the reality of the proposed laws will get through.

    President Obama is insulated from the public for another 40 months, but Democrats who want to ration care have to present themselves for re-election in a year and a half, and the old people and the families of the significantly disabled

    –who along with the elderly will be pushed out the hospital and clinic door by Obama/Pelosi/Reid—

    will get their say then.

    And it is likely to be as loud as that about to be heard in California.

  15. rosettasister Says:

    The Washington Post’s Web site launches a special package dedicated to the upcoming battle over President Obama’s top domestic priority: overhauling America’s $2.2 trillion health care system.

  16. rosettasister Says:

    Private sector cannot compete with a public insurance option – will lead to a single-payer system.

    Capitol Hill Watch | Fiscally Conservative Democrats Issue Principles for Health Reform, Continue To Seek Greater Role in Process

    According to Roll Call, the group’s guidelines did not address whether to include a public insurance option in an overhaul bill.

    Blue Dog health care task force Chair Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.) said the issue was purposely omitted.

    Ross added that the group is “willing to be open-minded and consider those types of options, but we want to be involved” (Dennis, Roll Call, 5/13).

  17. patriotamy Says:

    jrinNC Says:

    May 13, 2009 at 2:14 pm
    Good research and how very true that not only Obama needs a history lesson, many citizens need that lesson as well.

    Hi to all.. been to busy to post, but am reading as much as I can every day. Thanks to all of you who do take the time to post.

    JAC-if you are lurking as well, hope you are doing ok with your plans for the ‘BIG’ day. Soon. Next Friday!!!!! Happy Day to you.

    Rose, Thank you for all your hard work on this site. You are appreciated very much.

  18. rosettasister Says:

    patriotamy Says:
    May 13, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    Thanks, Amy!

    I can tell from the number of views each day that people are watching.

    I consider myself a high-end news gatherer and I’m just sharing what I find.

    Mostly I just like the tunes!

  19. rosettasister Says:

    A frightening prospect

    At a recent health-care “reform” rally, Rep. Jan Schakowsky directly advocated for single payer, total government health care. But she did not stop there.

    She went as far as to say what will eventually happen to private insurance that most Americans use.

    She related a recent anecdote,

    “[N]ext to me was a guy from the insurance company who … argued against the public health insurance option, saying it would not let private insurance companies compete.

    That a public option will put the private insurance industry out of business and lead to single payer. My single payer friends, he was right! The man was right.”

    This is frightening, both when you consider the facts and the intent of Ms. Schakowsky’s statement.

  20. rosettasister Says:

    Option 4 Please!

    Senate Finance Committee Releases Public Plan Options

    Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and ranking member Grassley on Monday released proposals for a public health insurance option and a requirement that all U.S. residents have health coverage, CQ HealthBeat reports (CQ HealthBeat, 5/12).

    The proposals in the 63-page “policy options” paper released Monday include three options for a public plan.

    One would be similar to Medicare; another would call for a third-party administrator outside of HHS to oversee and regulate the plan; and a third would allow states to decide whether to create a public option.

    The paper also gives the option of not including a public plan and instead relying on a “reformed and well-regulated private market” (Budoff Brown, Politico, 5/11).

    The paper also proposed employer and individual requirements for insurance.

    The individual requirement would be enforced through a tax on a percentage of the premium for the cheapest coverage offered through an insurance exchange (Edney, CongressDaily, 5/12).

    The report stated in the introduction, “While these proposed options are jointly offered for discussion, not all the options in this document have the support of” both Baucus and Grassley (Politico, 5/11).

  21. Fernley Girl Says:

    The Federal Reserve apparently can’t account for $9 trillion in off-balance sheet transactions.

    When Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Orlando) asked Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman of the Federal Reserve some very basic questions about where the trillions of dollars that have come from the Fed’s expanded balance sheet, the IG didn’t know.

    Worse, nobody at the Fed seems to have any idea what the losses on its $2 trillion portfolio really are.

    Read the rest here:

  22. rosettasister Says:

    The Sneaky Back Door to Single Payer Health Care

    Former Food and Drug Administration official and American Enterprise Institute fellow, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, in a smart Wall Street Journal op/ed yesterday. Gottlieb points out:

    “While the public option is meant for the uninsured, employers will realize it’s easier — and cheaper — to move employees into the government plan than continue workplace coverage.

    The Lewin Group, a health-care policy research and consulting firm, estimates that enrollment in the public option will reach 131 million people if it’s open to everyone and pays Medicare rates, as many expect.

    Fully two-thirds of the privately insured will move out of or lose coverage.

    As patients shift to a lower-paying government plan, doctors’ incomes will decline by as much as 15% to 20% depending on their specialty.”

    Of course, for supporters of a single payer government health care this shift would be, as they say, a feature, not a bug.

  23. rosettasister Says:

    Fernley Girl Says:
    May 13, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    Thank you, Girl!


    Rep. Alan Grayson asks the Federal Reserve Inspector General about the trillions of dollars lent or spent by the Federal Reserve and where it went, and the trillions of off balance sheet obligations. Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman responds that the IG does not know and is not tracking where this money is.

    See also:

  24. rosettasister Says:

    The silent majority of Americans must be made to understand just what “a public insurance option” really means.

    It may be payback time for insurance companies, but if middle America understood that that will inevitably lead to rationing, I believe they would reconsider.

    And we have to find a way to counter the opposition.


    Single-payer activists will be gathering all over the country to say, “Healthcare, yes; Insurance companies, no.”

  25. Fernley Girl Says:

    Remember this?

    Hawaii Ends Universal Child Health Care 7 Months After Start

    Saturday, October 18, 2008 |

    HONOLULU — Hawaii is dropping the only state universal child health care program in the country just seven months after it launched.

    Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration cited budget shortfalls and other available health care options for eliminating funding for the program. A state official said families were dropping private coverage so their children would be eligible for the subsidized plan.

    “People who were already able to afford health care began to stop paying for it so they could get it for free,” said Dr. Kenny Fink, the administrator for Med-QUEST at the Department of Human Services. “I don’t believe that was the intent of the program.”

    The rest of the article here:,2933,440561,00.html

  26. rosettasister Says:

    “People who were already able to afford health care began to stop paying for it so they could get it for free.”

    Exactly right!

  27. rosettasister Says:

    Great idea!

    Government Healthcare – A Proposed Amendment

    Let me assure you that the wealthy will find superior care. As the U.S. drives good physicians offshore, small countries will become the new home for healthcare for the evil rich.

    Middle class and lower class Americans will not be able to afford this option, they will be trapped in the U.S. and forced to use a federally run and inevitably poor healthcare system.

    So, lets propose an amendment to the coming healthcare reformation.

    All federal employees, including, but not limited to members of Congress, members of the Executive and Judicial branches, and their immediate families are legally restricted from pursuing healthcare outside of the government run system.

    There shall be no separate facilities constructed solely for the use of federal employees.

    All federal employees must use the healthcare system available to the least wealthy in the country.

    Socialized healthcare will be devastating to the poor, devastating to the elderly, and devastating to the quality and quantity of healthcare available to all citizens.

    If the federal government is going to mandate this system, the federal employees, who work for the citizens of this country, should be restricted to using only this same new system.

    Lets see if that amendment gets passed—-what is your guess?

    (It’s not too late to prevent this from happening. But the thought of subjecting the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government to rationing. If only!)

  28. rosettasister Says:

    Baitullah Mehsud

    Pakistan army plans to open second front against Taliban

    Pakistan plans to escalate its military operations against the Taliban massively by opening a second front in the country’s lawless border areas.

    The army, which is fighting in Swat Valley and two neighbouring districts in North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), is planning to begin a new offensive in the badlands of the Waziristan tribal areas as early as next month, sources told The Daily Telegraph.

    “The army is planning to go into Waziristan, possibly in June, which will involve huge numbers of troops in an attempt to establish some sort of state control over the area,” said a source close to the Pakistani military.

    The most likely first target of operations will be the head of the Pakistani Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, whose stronghold is in South Waziristan, which borders Afghanistan.

  29. rosettasister Says:

  30. rosettasister Says:

    Thank God!

    Obama U-turn on abuse photographs

    US President Barack Obama has changed his mind and will now attempt to block the publication of photographs showing the abuse of prisoners by US soldiers.

  31. rosettasister Says:

    Lawsuit Challenges Congress: Who Vetted Obama?

    (Hasn’t it been determined that no one did?)

    Atty Mario Apuzzo and plaintiff Charles Kerchner update us on their lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president targets Congress as a defendant for its “failure” to uphold the constitutional demand to make sure Obama qualified before approving the Electoral College vote that actually designated him as the occupant of the Oval Office.

    Date / Time: 5/13/2009 6:00 PM Pacific

  32. rosettasister Says:

    Found at Investigating Obama

    I don’t post the link because my computer always goes bonkers at his site.

    But you can copy and paste if you so desire:

    Arlen Williams said…

    Things to say….

    1. No one needs to be obsessed with this law suit.

    2. It should not be difficult to accept that Orly Taitz is responsible for the chaos she has spread and that others have decided to defend their reputations and privacy.

    3. There may or may not be a follow-up posting about this case and how it happened to come about. If I post such an article/commentary, it will become more understandable that Philip Berg, Lisa Liberi, MommaE, and Lisa Ostella have had their eye on the ball and that Orly Taitz has taken some problematic bait (and that Ed Hale has always been Ed Hale).

    May 12, 2009 8:23 PM

    Anonymous said…

    A day or two trying to hear Berg’s side and getting nowhere is not obsessing.Yes,it is not difficult at all to believe Orly is a loose cannon.

    But that alone,doesn’t prove the allegations in the 85 page lawsuit.The ones about Ed Hale are easy to believe for anyone that has listened to the man.

    But Orly’s crazy antics do not prove the allegations,for it hasn’t been mentioned how she is wrong.

    She could be,but that cannot be based on generalized statements about her.Any detriment to Berg’s reputation has been from his own actions.

    As for the two Lisas,most of us haven’t a clue.Shed some light on this topic or drop it.This isn’t about obsession or defending Orly.

    It is about interviews that were supposed to be about this slander lawsuit that ended up being more of Berg’s usual grandstanding.

    You apparently know more and thusd have taken Berg’s side vy saying they have their eye on the ball.

    Well,the listeners didn’t hear that evidence.

    They heard accusations just as in the lasuit.

    Until both sides are heard and examined it is impossible to render an impartial judgment in one’s mind,unless there has been a presuppositional bias at the outset.

    May 12, 2009 11:57 PM

    Anonymous said…

    What I mean with the difference between Hale and Taitz is that Hale is on record slandering Momma E over and over again.

    Orly hasn’t slandered Berg.She’s raised questions about Berg,and without a response it raised more questions.

    There is no doubt that she was wrong to email private information on the others.

    But,since Berg is doing all the talking and claims he is injured as well,it stands to reason he should say something on the topic instead of spouting the hoax line over and over.

    And sending out an email on Orly,making sure that bold and caps were used for the words : I NEED YOUR HELP!! and EVERYONE and FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

    Gee,that really sounds like he has his eye on the ball there Arlen.

    Again,regardless of what you or I or anyone else thinks of both of these lawyers,the evidence or information from both sides should be weighed and scrutinized before arriving at a decision.

    Of course,ultimately that is up to the court and a jury if necessary.But if this is public news,it is naturally going to be commented on.

    Once again,Berg hasn’t said much about the lawsuit.

    That’s his prerogative,but he should’ve let the hosts know so they could change the title of the show to Berg’s Donation Hour.

    May 13, 2009 12:10 AM

    Anonymous said…

    True.Eye on the moneyball.

    May 13, 2009 1:44 AM

    Arlen Williams said…

    Orly Taitz’ accusations according to this suit have been focused chiefly upon Lisa Liberi and Lisa Ostella.

    Since she relies significantly upon the work of others in her “research,” there seems to be a problem person or problem people giving her information/disinformation.

    May 13, 2009 8:55 AM

    Arlen Williams said…

    However, Lisa Liberi and Lisa Ostella are entitled to privacy regarding private matters, even if some or all of Taitz’ allegations are not true.

    If one does not wish to be grilled about personal matters pending a lawsuit playing out, there is little that can be fleshed out. That is the court’s job, essentially.

    May 13, 2009 9:04 AM

  33. rosettasister Says:

    “There seems to be a problem person or problem people giving her information/disinformation.”

    Polarik implied that person is Linda Starr.

  34. rosettasister Says:

    Speaking of Ron Polarik and Phil Berg

    To: BIGLOOK; Beckwith; null and void; stockpirate; pissant; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; Myrddin; ..

    “There wasn’t a conspiracy in Honolulu in 1961 to produce a CoLB for young Barry so he could be president…The Birth Certificate issue has nothing to do with conspiracy.”

    As presented, I agree with you. However, there absolutely was a conspiracy to lie, distort, and deceive the public about the validity the COLB posted online (a year ago June 12),

    AS WELL AS to crush all criticisms and honest discussions about it through public humiliation, slander, and bogus “analyses,” perpetuated by media outlets,

    self-proclaimed “fact checking” sites, Obama supporters and apologists, disinenguous graphics “experts,” and everybody else who wanted to take shots at me

    because I had the audacity to provide evidence to the contrary, and to withstand all that they could hurl my way.

    The BIGGEST lie of all is that the liberal Left has no equal when it comes to conspiracy theories.

    The shear number and diversity of bizzare conspiracy theories spouted by the Left about 9/11 is unprecedented in history. They began the Truth Movement.

    They called the account of Al Qaeda, Bin Laden, and the 19 hijackers the Bush Administration’s conspiracy. and every possible alternative was accepted as gospel.

    The irony about all of the crap that they gave Phil Berg for bringing the first lawsuit against Obama, calling him a “Truther,” is that

    nowhere in the entire history of the Truth Movement and its many copycats is Berg, a Democrat, ever mentioned!

    I have to say, in all candor, that if forging a COLB was the worst thing that Obama has ever done, and ever will do,

    our country would be far better off than everything else he has done in less than four months in office.

    The fradulent COLB has become iconic of a fradulent man, a fraudulent family, a fraudulent biography, a fraudulent Administration, a fraudulent election, and millions of fraudulent supporters.

    The fraudulent COLB was neither the beginning nor the end of ZERO’s web of deception.

    It should be, however, a reminder to everyone that the cover-up of an illegal act can be more egregious than the act itself.

    89 posted on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:36:26 AM by Polarik

  35. rosettasister Says:

  36. sdee Says:

    Rose, thanks for all the healthcare links!

    On another topic:

    Seems the Fed would fail its own stress test:

  37. sdee Says:

    Another interesting item from WSJ:

    Obama pisses on the Constitution again. Gotta rest well at night knowing our new prez is a Harvard trained Constitutional Law expert.

    “Chrysler and the Rule of Law”

  38. rosettasister Says:

    Highly recommend you view this. Thanks, sdee!




    Gigot: But there’s no question that you’re going to have to have higher taxes. That’s at a minimum, and the Obama administration said in 2011 taxes are going up. You spend this amount of money, you have a trillion dollars in deficit spending. You’re either going to have to do one of two things–you have to raise taxes, or you have to borrow more money.

    O’Grady: Well, they’re going to have to do both. They’re going to do both. And the borrowing is also very frightening, because you can see by looking at the bond market that the cost to borrow, the risks that, for example, China perceives in borrowing from the United States, is going up. So the debt servicing is going to become more expensive.

    Gigot: Dan, key question. What is the limit of the world’s willingness to lend money to the United States of America? They’ve always done it before.

    Henninger: Right.

    Gigot: Are we at the end of that limit?

    Henninger: We’re getting close, and we have some very specific evidence of that. Recently, China’s central bank governor proposed in a paper that we replace the dollar, the international reserve currency, with a new international reserve currency. There was a financial panel at the United Nations which has proposed the same thing.

    Gigot: They’re saying the dollar isn’t safe anymore.

    Henninger: They’re saying the dollar isn’t safe anymore.

  39. rosettasister Says:

    The Hubble Space Telescope was captured by space shuttle Atlantis’ robotic arm.

    Using views from a camera centered in a structure where the telescope will be berthed, McArthur will lower Hubble into a special cradle, called the Flight Support System, or FSS, in Atlantis’ payload bay.

    The telescope will be latched to the high-tech, lazy Susan-type device for the duration of the servicing work.

    An umbilical adjacent to the rotating FSS will be remotely connected to provide electrical power from Atlantis to the telescope.

    Then, Altman will position the shuttle to allow Hubble’s solar arrays to gather energy from the sun to fully charge the telescope’s batteries.

  40. rosettasister Says:

  41. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    Well well well, I guess I’m that last to know about the Real ID act. Geez and I’ve often said that I “didn’t JUST fall off the turnip truck.” Well, I reckon I’ve lied. Papers please?

    “They” are just bond and determined to bring about the NWO. And I thought we just had to worry about folks trying to get us to inject an ID chip under our skin. I feel so dumb.

  42. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    You folks are right. Preparedness is essential. No one can be trusted. The elections are more than rigged. Campaigns are merely show produced by the FED. And it matters not who wins. It’s the show that matters. It keeps us thinking we are empowered by our vote, when alas, whoever wins is still its puppet — bobbling atop the hand of the Money Masters.

  43. ryansgrammy Says:

    jrinNC — that was great information. I’m going to prepare a new sign for my next tea party with my state’s preamble. I’m also going to send it to my candidate for governor so he can use it in his campaign. Thanks

  44. jrinNC Says:

    Universal Health and Old people May 13, 2009 – 12:07 ET

    This is really old news, but I guess people are just starting to wake up. I guess I paid more attention in the beginning because I am one of those Old people and realized what this health care reform would mean to me. This cost effectiveness program will deny us the care we are use to just because as Daschle said poor health comes with aging so suck it up. I wonder how will this affect Doctor’s who have taken the Hippocratic Oath to heart.

  45. ryansgrammy Says:

    This is off topic but I read it earlier today and it really bothered me. If I declared I would only use businesses owned and operated by white people for any services I needed, I’d be in the news too but it wouldn’t be favorable–I’d be accused of discrimination and labeled a racist. Once again the double standard.

  46. jrinNC Says:

    You are welcome ryansgrammy – I received this info from a friend and what so totally amazed at how many of our states gave credit to God for their rights.

    I sent NC preamble to my Governor and State Representatives today telling them I have been extremely upset over the course that our federal government has been taking. Excerpt of what I said “I have only one thing to remind you of as you represent our State. Please take to heart the preamble of our State Constitution. North Carolina 1868, Preamble “We the people of the State of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for our civil, political, and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those… ” With that in mind I hope you will see that the current federal government administration IS NOT in line with this policy.”

  47. jrinNC Says:

    Duh – brain cramp – WAS so totally amazed at how many of our states gave credit to God for their rights.

  48. rosettasister Says:

    KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:
    May 13, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    Thanks, Lexi, I had never heard of it before.


    Seems Napolitano wants to replace The REAL ID Act with a draft bill called PASS ID

    Is this for REAL?

    Draft legislation is circulating on the Hill to repeal the REAL ID Act. Passed in 2005, with bipartisan support, the REAL ID Act requires states to assure that any identity cards used for a federal purpose (like passing through a Transportation Security Administration security checkpoint before boarding a plane) be issued only to individuals who are lawfully present in the United States.

    As Senior Fellow James Carafano writes [1] “[t]hese states have a key ally, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. As governor of Arizona, she vociferously opposed REAL ID.”

    To make matter worse, the law she wants to replace it with, a draft bill called PASS ID [1], “reads as an initiative designed to pave the way for granting a general amnesty to illegal immigrants. One reading of the PASS ID Act suggests it may establish a federal requirement, as part of ‘legalization,’ that states must issue drivers’ licenses to everyone here illegally.”


  49. jrinNC Says:

    “PASS ID Act suggests it may establish a federal requirement, as part of ‘legalization,’ that states must issue drivers’ licenses to everyone here illegally.”

    Rose, the only thing I have to say about that is they will have a very hard time getting them all to pass the test. I observed the so called “HELPING” a few of folks when I recently went to renew my license. I was shocked needless to say how they basically gave them the answers.

  50. rosettasister Says:

    Would that be in NC, jr?

  51. rosettasister Says:

    I’m pretty sure Napolitano doesn’t oppose Real ID because she’s worried about violating someone’s privacy rights.

    Don’t we need a national ID card if we’re ever going to seriously address illegal immigration in this country?


    Missouri lawmakers vote to reject federal Real ID Act

    “That’s a pretty strong statement right there that the federal government should back off,” said Rep. Jim Guest, R-King City, who has sponsored the measure for several years.

    Real ID requires that driver’s licenses include the holder’s full name, birth date, gender, license number, digital photograph, principal address and signature as well as tamper-resistant security features. The law also sets standards for verifying a license applicant’s identity and citizenship.

    States have until the end of this year to meet the federal requirements but could get an extension until May 2011.

    At that time, citizens in noncompliant states would not be able to board federally regulated planes or enter federal buildings simply by showing their state driver’s licenses.

    Some Missouri senators said they think the effective date will be pushed back to 2015 and that federal officials might not even implement the law.

    “They are finding out that this is not the great program that the federal government deemed it was,” said Sen. Chuck Purgason, R-Caulfield.

    During Senate debate, some lawmakers argued Real ID was a backdoor attempt to create a national ID card.

    The Real ID bill is House Bill 361.

  52. jrinNC Says:

    Rose – Jeff Schreiber, America’s Right posted an article on the “Double Standard” you mentioned above.

  53. jrinNC Says:

    Yes Rose – NC

  54. rosettasister Says:

    Thanks, jr!

  55. rosettasister Says:

    jrinNC Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 1:05 am

    Actually, that was ryansgrammy

  56. jrinNC Says:

    Oops – Rose – you are right. Sorry ryansgrammy.

  57. ryansgrammy Says:

    Its Okay jrinNC- I’m actually a Rose too (one with thorns according to my hubby). Thanks for the other article from Schreiber.

  58. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    I’m pretty sure Napolitano doesn’t oppose Real ID because she’s worried about violating someone’s privacy rights.

    Don’t we need a national ID card if we’re ever going to seriously address illegal immigration in this country?


    I don’t believe “They” really don’t care about illegal immigration. I think the patriot act suggest that. If it were anything more than a way to keep taps on we drones working to pay back all that interest to the FED, then wouldn’t the tex-mex boarder be completely closed off? The goal, imo, is to remove all boarders and turn the whole world into interest paying drones.

    OMG, I’ve become a total wing-nut eh?

  59. sdee Says:

    Back during the election I recall seeing a video of Khadafi addressing a large crowd about Obama. Khadafi’s message was basically that Obama was only saying he supported Israel in order to get elected – that his true allegiance was with Islam and they would see his true agenda once elected.

    I had pretty much forgotten about the video until I got the following email today from the Republican Trust. In case you don’t know them, it is the third largest PAC in the US. They raised a huge amount of money to run Reverend Wright commercials the last few weeks of the election when McCain and the RNC failed to step up to the plate. Republican Trust money also was instrumental getting Chambliss elected in the Georgia runoff election.

    Something very interesting must be going on for Republican Trust to drudge up this odd little video. Here is the email – I will see if I can find the video and post it too:

    Is There an Obama-Gadhafi Link?

    By: Scott Wheeler

    Whose interest was President Obama serving on March 30, when he ordered Chrysler to either conclude a merger with Italian automaker Fiat within 30 days or lose federal bailout funds which would lead to its immediate demise?

    That untimely announcement placed Chrysler in the untenable position of accepting whatever Fiat offered, literally cutting the legs out from under the struggling American carmaker’s negotiating platform. Some financial analysts had already determined that what Fiat was offering was a very bad deal for Chrysler.

    “The steal of the century,” Forbes columnist Jerry Flint wrote of the deal back in January. “Fiat gets Chrysler for next to no money, and American taxpayers must throw in $7 billion to make it happen.” By most accounts, Chrysler was in real trouble, but by announcing to the world that Chrysler had no other alternatives Obama effectively told Fiat that Chrysler would accept whatever Fiat offered, eliminating Chrysler’s ability to cut a better deal.

    Why would Obama undercut a U.S. company, involved in a heated negotiation, in favor of a foreign company’s interest?

    Clear answers are not available, but the presence one very curious shareholder in Fiat raises some interesting questions. The African nation of Libya owns at least a 2 percent stake in Fiat and thus makes Moammar Gadhafi, who controls the wealth of Libya, a direct beneficiary of the deal favoring Fiat.

    Does Obama owe Gadhafi?

    That is a tough question to answer, but Obama’s record-shattering $700 million presidential fundraising operation and a revealing speech Gadhafi delivered nearly a year ago, seem to undress Obama’s inexplicable sabotage of Chrysler’s negotiating position with Fiat.

    Before anyone was suspicious of the sources of Obama’s campaign funds, Gadhafi made a speech that Al Jazeera carried on June 11, 2008, and translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

    “All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency.”

    Is Gadhafi revealing his knowledge of something that no one else even suspected at the time?

    Since Gadhafi’s June 2008 speech, other evidence has surfaced suggesting that Obama raised significant sums from dubious sources in Gadhafi’s neighborhood, including tens of thousands of dollars the campaign was forced to return once it was revealed the origin of the funds was in Gaza, the Middle East.

    So far there has been very little interest in the sources of Obama’s massive fundraising, and with Democrats in control of both houses of Congress, it is unlikely that there will be an investigation into what many believe is the most prolific fundraising abuse ever.

    Gadhafi’s prescient speech didn’t end with his apparent knowledge of Obama’s sources of campaign funds though. MEMRI’s translation also included Gadhafi’s foreknowledge that Obama’s campaign rhetoric about supporting Israel also was just a head fake.

    “But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother who is an American national, made statements [about Jerusalem] that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world . . .

    “As you know, this is the farce of elections — a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him,” Gadhafi stated in his speech that got no coverage from the mainstream American media.

    Since his election, pro-Israel Americans have been shocked at how quickly Obama’s policies turned hostile toward Israel, such as the $900 million in aid headed to Gaza after they attacked Israel with mortars late last year, and forcing Israel to negotiate with Hamas.

    With the precision of a campaign insider, Gadhafi also predicted a recently announced Obama policy regarding Israel nearly a year ago: “We thought he would say: ‘I have decided that if I win, I will monitor the Dimona nuclear plant, and the other WMD in Israeli’s possession.’”

    Last week, a State Department official announced that the Obama administration would pressure Israel to sign the nuclear nonproliferation treaty that would allow among other details, Obama to inspect Israel’s nuclear weapons program, something the Israeli’s have kept secret since its inception.

    What is most amazing is that the propaganda arm of the Middle East, the anti-American Al Jazeera network, has proven more informative about Obama’s Middle East policies than the sycophantic American media.

    Scott Wheeler is executive director of The National Republican Trust PAC (, the nation’s third-largest political action committee.

  60. sdee Says:

    Here is the link to the Khadafi video:

  61. rosettasister Says:

    KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 2:31 am

    The goal, imo, is to remove all borders and turn the whole world into interest paying drones.

    OMG, I’ve become a total wing-nut eh?


    This made me laugh!

    Michael Steele warned us about the Collective (the Borg)!

    Resistance is futile! NOT!

    Good night, good people!

  62. ddlew Says:

    2nd congressman: Prove eligibility
    Virginia representative signs onto plan to demand evidence

  63. ryansgrammy Says:

    They blasted AIG for paying bonuses when it failed, yet failing newspapers like Chicago Tribune & LA Times that are also failing are paying bonuses.

  64. CJ Says:

    Oh poor Nanny Pelosi, she’s squirming like a worm on an hook right now on tv. She’s still trying to spin her way out of her lies. I love watching her melt. HaHa. Blame Bush of course for everything. Liberals never take any responsibility for anything they do. She’s really getting grilled by the reporters. I love it. Her self awarded halo is really slipping sideways!!

  65. CJ Says:

    Ryansgrammy: Didn’t Fannie and Freddie also pay out their bonuses? What happened to the news reports about that? Where’s the outrage there for the 2 entities who really lit the fire on the financial mess? Barney Frank’s little money machine never got the full force of public censure about those bonuses now did they?

  66. rosettasister Says:

    The Freepers should have some interesting things to say, to say the least.

    My guess is Pelosi’s just digging the hole deeper, just a guess.

    Freeper Thread:

    Pelosi Is Accusing the C.I.A. of Lying to Congress (“Waterboarding”)

  67. rosettasister Says:

    Let God Be The Judge – ALAN KEYES, Letter to Fr. David Tyson, Superior to Fr. Jenkins


    Because their actions take place in the context of a proposed event that necessarily focuses the attention of the world upon them, the scandal involved in the actions of Father Jenkins et al is an occasion of scandal to members of the community of the faithful throughout the world. This means that you, Bishop D’Arcy and other responsible Church authorities in America must act on behalf of those throughout the world whose responsibilities may be adversely affected by the ongoing scandal, including of course both the Head of your Order and the Holy Father in Rome. As directly injured victims of the scandal, we will certainly be grateful for your performance of this duty, but we are sure responsible shepherds of the Church throughout the world will pray to the Lord in thanksgiving for your diligence.

    As members of the laity with no expertise in matters of canon law and procedure, we beg your indulgence and charitable aid if anything in this letter, or the manner of its presentation, fails to accord with forms that could only be known to such experts. However, for many centuries those such as you, who are charged with responsibility for overseeing the conduct of orders such as the Congregation of Holy Cross, have been asked to hear and judge cases that arise from the relations between their members and the larger community of the faithful in which they operate. The laity has always relied upon the guidance, fairness, charity and justice before God of those charged with such responsibilities, before and in preference to any recourse to civil authorities who may operate without regard for the laws of God and the teachings of the Church.

    In recent years, unfortunate and spiritually tragic events have in some measure damaged the laity’s trust in these procedures. Such demoralization is precisely the sort of harm scandal involves. We trust however in your goodwill. As victims of the grave and spreading scandal now in progress we look forward to a prompt reply consistent with the urgent obligation to curtail the damage it does to us and to the community of the faithful throughout the world.

    With Trust and Respect,

    Alan L. Keyes

  68. rosettasister Says:

    I’m really beginning to like this newspaper!

    Obama Administration Silences Critics With Intimidation

    There’s a new and important book that makes the case against the Fairness Doctrine by Brian Jennings, titled Censorship: The Threat to Silence Talk Radio: The ‘New’ Fairness Doctrine Exposed.

    The title gets the message across. The Fairness Doctrine is just a fancy roundabout method of censoring conservative talk radio.

    Mr. Jennings makes an ironclad case against the Fairness Doctrine, but I found one of the most interesting parts of the book involved a chapter titled Obama Weighs In: Our New President’s History of Censorship.

    The chapter documents Mr. Obama’s record showing affinity for censorship, disrespect of the First Amendment and improper intimidation to suppress critics.

  69. rosettasister Says:

    Michael Sheehy – No Comment

    Congress and Waterboarding

    Nancy Pelosi was an accomplice to ‘torture.’


    We also know that Michael Sheehy, then Mrs. Pelosi’s top aide on the Intelligence Committee and later her national security adviser, not only attended the September 2002 meeting but was also briefed by the CIA on EITs on Feb. 5, 2003, and told about a videotape of Zubaydah being waterboarded.

    Mr. Sheehy was almost certain to have told Mrs. Pelosi. He has not commented publicly about the 2002 or the 2003 meetings.

    So is the speaker of the House lying about what she knew and when?

    And, if so, what will Democrats do about it?

  70. rosettasister Says:

    Earth to Rachel Maddow!

    During a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 8th, 2004, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) discusses harsh interrogation methods, saying to Attorney General John Ashcroft:

    “And I’d like to interject a note of balance here. There are times when we all get in high dudgeon. We ought to be reasonable about this.

    I think there are probably very few people in this room or in America who would say that torture should never, ever be used, particularly if thousands of lives are at stake.

    Take the hypothetical:

    If we knew that there was a nuclear bomb hidden in an American city and we believed that some kind of torture, fairly severe maybe, would give us a chance of finding that bomb before it went off, my guess is most Americans and most senators, maybe all, would say,

    Do what you have to do. So it’s easy to sit back in the armchair and say that torture can never be used. But when you’re in the foxhole, it’s a very different deal.”

  71. NEConservative Says:

    re Alan Keyes Letter — that’s so awesome. I’m thinking he should’ve been our Republican nominee last year!! He and Palin on the same ticket, I think, would be really awesome. Has anyone investigated how much of a strict constitutionalist he is? From what I’ve gathered, he’s the real deal!!!

  72. Missy Says:

    I just read Market Ticker, and it talks about the hearings that have been going on about Treasury/Banks..YOU MUST READ THIS! THIS is how Obama can be impeached…
    He knew, he lied, and covered up information..They strong armed the banks, and robbed us all..Please read this ticker!
    And PLEASE pass it on to everyone!!!,-Government-Style.html

  73. rosettasister Says:

    NEConservative Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Alan Keyes has Barack Obama’s number.

    Some consider him an extremist, but I always stop to listen to his words.

    He is a man of conviction.

    You can tell he believes in every word he utters.

  74. rosettasister Says:

    Random Thoughts

    In addition to the many issues I have with Obama, what I find especially galling is that he is too cerebral. He is intellectual rather than emotional. A happy medium would be nice, as my mother used to say.

    But the following illustrates that he is persuadable, he can be persuaded.

    And that is a good thing.

    Let’s hope President Obama can be persuaded not to include the slippery slope of “a public insurance option” in his health care reform.

    Option 4 Please!


    In reversal, Obama seeks to block abuse photos

    Gen. David Petraeus, the senior commander for both wars, had also weighed in against the release, as had Gen. David McKiernan, the outgoing top general in Afghanistan.

  75. rosettasister Says:

    Missy Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    Hi, Missy!

    Only first posts are moderated.

  76. rosettasister Says:

  77. rosettasister Says:

  78. rosettasister Says:

    Spot on, as usual.

    Pelosi and the Posers: Will They Accept A Waterboarding Accomplice As Speaker?

    Nancy P. doesn’t have to worry though.

    It has never been about torture for most of the hysterical critics of W.

    She’ll get a pass.

    But when next you read an impassioned denunciation of torture, look for the reference to Nancy Pelosi, and when you don’t see it, laugh at the writer.

  79. rosettasister Says:

    End Stage Bush Derangement Syndrome, Indeed!

    Oh, this made my day! Thank you, Mr. Hewitt!

    Hitchens On Maureen Dowd’s Column Yesterday –“Drivel”– and Speaker Pelosi’s Lying About What She Knew About Waterboarding

    Here’s the transcript of yesterday’s conversation with Christopher Hitchens.

    The podcast is here.

    [audio src="" /]

    Yesterday’s Dowd column blaming Dick Cheney for all future terrorist attacks in the U.S. no matter when or where they occur marks the most obvious case of end stage BDS I have ever seen, and the low point in the opinion section of the New York Times, until of course Dowd writes again.

    “Drivel” is exactly right, but Dowd’s anticipatory defense of President Obama’s innocence of any responsibility for a future terrorist attack is a signal that even the left knows the new president is dismantling the defenses brick by brick.


    HH: But I don’t to get off on that with you. I wanted to ask you about Maureen Dowd, who I know is a colleague of yours, and I think a friend, but she wrote this paragraph today, and I’m curious, about Dick Cheney, your reaction to it.

    “Cheney,” she wrote, “has no coherent foreign policy viewpoint.

    He still doesn’t fathom that his brutish invasion of Iraq unbalanced that part of the world, empowered Iran, was a force multiplier for Muslims who hate America.

    He left our ports unsecured, our food supply unsafe, the Taliban rising, and Osama on the loose.

    No matter if or when terrorists attack here, and they’re on their own timetable, not a partisan red/blue state timetable, Cheney will be deemed the primary one who made America more vulnerable.”

    Your assessment of that?

    CH: Oh, I think it’s drivel.

    I mean, the fact of the matter is, that in our, in Iraq, which is what she’s really on about, I mean, the rest is all froth, we have inflicted a very major battlefield defeat on the forces of al Qaeda, which we haven’t yet been able to put off in the Democrats’ favorite war, the liberals’ favorite war, Afghanistan.

    If you read any of the profiles of General Stanley McChrystal today, a man whose name I have known of for some time, one day the story will be told of how he took Baghdad back from these psychos and torturers and mass murderers by ruthlessly inflicting pain on them.

    And he’s a national hero.
    (Okay, Hitchens is officially off my List of Pompous Asses. Oh, that’s right! He was never on it.)

  80. rosettasister Says:

    More from Christopher Hitchens with Hugh Hewitt

    Good stuff!

    HH: But back to Maureen, you call it drivel, I agree. But is it because she does not know the truth, or because she fears for her political allies so much that she’ll obviously write what is obviously drivel?

    CH: No, I think, I would say for Maureen, having rudely, but I mean I have to be honest, said that I thought that the column was drivel,

    I think she does very sincerely believe, and is very angry in the belief that the intervention in Iraq was provoked by false intelligence, by manipulation of public opinion, all of that.

    And I think she genuinely believes it, and I think she feels it was an offense to our democracy, and that it’s made the conditions of Iraqis worse, and that yes, it’s also inflamed the Muslim world against us.

    The awful thing about all that, in my opinion, is that it’s not half true, but maybe it’s about 10% true.

    Some of it is. And that makes it irritating.

    HH: But Cheney being deemed the primary one who made America more vulnerable?

    CH: Well, if you want to roll all of that into one ball of wax, then the figure of Mr. Richard Cheney, Vice President Cheney, is your ideal, because he somehow seems to conform to all of these liberal nightmares.

    HH: Well, it’s like Gollum. I just, I cannot…

    CH: (laughing)

    HH: I cannot get over it, but he is like Grendel out of his den. I said that yesterday, and he does drive the left to distraction. Not you, Christopher Hitchens, I appreciate the time from Vanity Fair.

    (Well, isn’t that the problem in our country? You can be only 10% correct and still win the argument.)

  81. rosettasister Says:

    Wild and Wacky Thoughts

    I wondered if the following were anything like the Edgar Cayce readings.

    Admittedly, I don’t have a whole lot of patience for this type of information.

    I need to work on that.

    Mind is ever the builder.

    I do know one thing about myself.

    I refuse to live in a world where there are no more prophets, no more revelators.

    And so one’s level of discernment is critical.

    And I need to work on that, too.

  82. rosettasister Says:

    I’ll be listening to Tenacity this evening.

    Date / Time: 5/14/2009 6:00 PM Pacific

    Category: Politics

    Call-in Number: (347) 215-6929

    I believe this is the link:

    Last night’s show:

    On May 13 The Patriots Heart Network will present a special 60 minute edition of The Chalice Show, featuring guest Alan Keyes Dr. Alan Keyes and Randall Terry.

  83. rosettasister Says:

    Option 4 Please!

    Senate Finance Committee To Discuss Public Plan Options; House Energy and Commerce Committee Discusses State, Regional Plans

    The Senate Finance Committee on Thursday will meet to discuss the inclusion of a public insurance plan in its health care reform legislation, the Des Moines Register reports (Beaumont, Des Moines Register, 5/14).

    Supporters of the public plan say it would allow middle-income workers a choice between their employer coverage and coverage offered by the government.

    The insurance industry and Republican lawmakers oppose such a plan.

    The Finance Committee will consider a plan similar to Medicare but that would feature slightly higher reimbursement rates for providers.

    The plan would either be operated by the government or government-contracted private firms.

    Another option would allow each state to develop and oversee its own public coverage plan.

    The committee also will consider a proposal from Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that would allow a new public plan to compete with private insurers by requiring that the public plan be financed by premiums rather than tax dollars, that it follow the same solvency rules that apply to private firms and that it keep a reserve fund to cover liabilities.

    Schumer’s plan also would allow doctors and hospitals the choice of participating.

    The public plan also would be required to follow the same consumer protection rules as private firms (Alonso-Zaldivar/Werner, AP/Contra Costa Times, 5/14).

    The panel also is expected to discuss employer or individual mandates (Edney, CongressDaily, 5/14).


    Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who has said he believes a public plan would eventually eliminate private insurance and force U.S. residents out of their employer-sponsored plans, said the committee meeting will reveal the likelihood of Republicans uniting against a public option.


    “We will have an idea how controversial it is and how strong people feel about it on both sides,” Grassley said.

    He added, “I think before I would write it off completely, I would want to look at what those possible compromises are” (Des Moines Register, 5/14).

  84. rosettasister Says:

    Let’s see – who should I believe? This guy or Senator Grassley?

    The left pulls out all the stops!

    The derivation of this phrase is from the fact that pipe organs have stops which control the air flow and that pulling them out increases the volume.


    A big reform this year is likely, but a half or quarter loaf won’t cut it. If Congress rejects a public option—the only real way to control costs—and Obama goes along, a great moment will have been lost.

  85. rosettasister Says:

    Well, I like this, but if a public insurance “option” is part of the package, that will inevitably lead to single payer.

    We have to get this message across.

    Live from Rancho Rio, it’s President Obama

    12:48 – First question from a woman is about health care – why is a government single-payer plan off the table?

    Obama says he is confident the health care overhaul can get done this year, but not if people try too hard to be “ideologically pure.”

    The big problem is restraining health care costs, which drive U.S. debt. That’s why he’s promoting preventive care. He also wants to cover all Americans.

    A single-payer system could make sense “if we were starting from scratch” – but we’re not.

    “We don’t want a huge disruption” as we trying to change one-sixth of the U.S. economy.

    Besides, too many in Congress object to single-payer.

  86. rosettasister Says:

  87. rosettasister Says:

    Students take lead in helping IDPs

  88. rosettasister Says:

    No kidding!

    Taliban wants ‘new world order’

    Asif Ali Zardari, the Pakistani president, has said that his country’s fight against the Taliban is not just a domestic battle but one that the whole world needs to be aware of.

    Speaking during a news conference in London with Gordon Brown, the British prime minister, Zardari said the Taliban are seeking to create a “new world order” and that more effort was needed by the international communty to defeat the fighters.

    Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, on Wednesday warned that the threat the fighters pose to both Afghanistan and Pakistan was very real.

    “Terrorists and extremists are extending their reach in whole areas of our countries,” Karzai told a regional economic conference in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad.

    Nato and US commanders have been looking for alternative supply routes in Pakistan recently, although they say that the attacks on supply convoys have not threatened their operations in Afghanistan.

  89. rosettasister Says:

    Are there really any Pakistanis that know how to operate these things?

    Pakistan Wants ‘Ownership’ of U.S. Drones

    LONDON – Pakistan has asked Washington for “ownership” of US drones carrying out attacks on its territory, President Asif Ali Zardari said May 13.

    “Democracy doesn’t believe in half measures. We’ve asked for the ownership of the drones,” he said, when asked about reports that the U.S. has agreed to pass control of drone aircraft to Islamabad.

    Speaking in London after talks with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Zardari said Islamabad was “negotiating terms” with the U.S. over the drones, which have long been a source of tension between Washington and Islamabad.

  90. rosettasister Says:

    LIBERI et al v. TAITZ et al

    Last update: No updates

    Keyword tags: None



  91. rosettasister Says:

    Another comment found at Investigating Obama

    This time from PatriotLinda.


    PatriotLinda said…

    Arlen & Hanen,

    I can’t believe you keep falling for his crap. I listened to about a total of 7 min of the entire program(fast forwarding past the redundit crap) and Berg doesn’t know crap from shinola about the constitution. Everything he says about the definition of NBC is incorrect.

    And not only does Berg NOT know his constitution, you guys just sat there and never brought up any of the supporting documents from the founding fathers and the intent of the NBC clause.

    The lawsuit against Orly isn’t about the law, it’s about getting Berg more air-time for him-self and he has that E person prodding him all the way and we already know to take anything she says with a grain of salt, because that’s about the size of the truth it only hopes to hold.

    My conclusion, none of this is going anywhere, even the AGJ’s which are now running unconstitutionally because they have broken the 1st rule of a jury: jurors entering into it unbiased.

    So, until some sorry Senator or Congressman wakes up in Washington, we are stuck for 3 1/2 yrs and by that time we will no longer recognize our country because too many so called patriots are too tied up in the new blogtalk fame game and not proud enough to get off their PC easy chair and go to the real public.

    Hey, how about a show on that…”What are you doing besides blogging for the cause to save the country and our constitution”.

    May 13, 2009 8:34 PM

    I’m guessing “that E person” is MommaE.

    You know I’ve never understood this vitriol aimed at MommaE.

    I didn’t understand it DrOrly’s Dossier Number Six, and I still don’t get it.

    What do these people have against her?

    All I can say is that is once they chose to associate themselves with Ed Hale, well … that was wrong-headed.

  92. rosettasister Says:

    MommaE Radio Rebels

    MommaE Radio Rebels will have a Special Guest this Friday, Edward Allen Buck.

    Friday night, May 15, 2009 at 5:30 PM Pacific, 6:30 Mountain, 7:30 PM Central, 8:30 PM Eastern,

    Stay plugged in for events like this and more with the Defend Our Freedoms Community Network Calendar. The calendar has a email notifier that users can set up.

    Edward Allen Buck, a Plaintiff in Dr. Orly Taitz’s filings, is the writer of the Quo Warranto


    Quo Warranto Cover Letter–james-v-obama.aspx

    Pleadings – James v. Obama–united-states-attorney-jeffrey-a-taylor.aspx

    Quo Warranto – United States Attorney, Jeffrey A. Taylor

    Quo Warranto to Attorney General Holder

    Posted by Defend Our Freedoms at 5/14/2009 7:16 AM

  93. rosettasister Says:

    I’m assuming that link would be:

    Date / Time: 5/15/2009 5:30 PM Pacific

    Category: Politics

    Call-in Number: (347) 237-4870

  94. rosettasister Says:


    2nd congressman: Prove eligibility

    Virginia representative signs onto plan to demand evidence

    WND earlier reported when freshman Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., filed H.R. 1503, an amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971.

    According to the Library of Congress’ bill-tracking website, H.R. 1503 would “require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of president to include with the committee’s statement of organization a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.”

    The plan has been referred to the House committee on House administration, where it has remained.

    Now, Virginia Republican Bob Goodlatte has signed on as a co-sponsor, putting a notice on his website that it’s one of the efforts in which he’s joining.

  95. rosettasister Says:

    I really do hate to say this, but Polarik’s comments at the Free Republic are getting increasingly alarmist.

    Which sucks, because people will look at this and think to themselves, “This guy’s nuts!”

    And then they will be dismissive about his prior findings, even though he may have been right about Obama’s COLB being a forgery.

    Polarik, I know you’ve been through a lot. And I’m sorry. But please get a grip, man!


    “Well, I hope I’m wrong, but this discovery is too ominous to ignore.”;page=284#284

  96. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    Missy Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    I just read Market Ticker, and it talks about the hearings that have been going on about Treasury/Banks..YOU MUST READ THIS! THIS is how Obama can be impeached…
    He knew, he lied, and covered up information..They strong armed the banks, and robbed us all..Please read this ticker!
    And PLEASE pass it on to everyone!!!,-Government-Style.html


    Hey Missy! I’m ready.

  97. rosettasister Says:

    The Fight For Freedom Call – Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:30 PM Eastern

    At TEA Parties across the country, hundreds of thousands of citizens declared that our taxes are too high, our federal government is too big, and our states’ rights are being trampled upon.

    Out of respect for that great movement, we want to be sure to do our part.

    Join a free telephone call with Governors Mark Sanford of South Carolina and Rick Perry of Texas to collaborate on our plan to fight for freedom and win America back.

  98. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    Missy Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    I just read Market Ticker, and it talks about the hearings that have been going on about Treasury/Banks..YOU MUST READ THIS! THIS is how Obama can be impeached…


    Count me in Missy!

  99. rosettasister Says:

    More Polarik

  100. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    Hey, let’s not forget, Ten will be on tonight. Anyone remember the thread title w/ the show details, please?

  101. KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:

    rosettasister Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    I’ll be listening to Tenacity this evening.

    Date / Time: 5/14/2009 6:00 PM Pacific

    Category: Politics

    Call-in Number: (347) 215-6929

    I believe this is the link:

    Last night’s show:

    On May 13 The Patriots Heart Network will present a special 60 minute edition of The Chalice Show, featuring guest Alan Keyes Dr. Alan Keyes and Randall Terry.


    Ooh DUH! I guess I should scan though a little better eh?

    Thanks Rose.

  102. rosettasister Says:

    I believe this is right:

    I’ll be listening to Tenacity this evening.

    Date / Time: 5/14/2009 6:00 PM Pacific

    Category: Politics

    Call-in Number: (347) 215-6929

    I believe this is the link:

  103. rosettasister Says:

    A hymn for two very special people:

    “Bear one another’s burdens, and share each other’s joys, / Love one another, and bring each other home”

  104. rosettasister Says:

    KoolAid_Free_Lexi Says:
    May 14, 2009 at 9:36 pm

    Ooh DUH! I guess I should scan though a little better eh?

    Thanks Rose.


    No problem, Lexi!

  105. rosettasister Says:

    New Thread:

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: