“Letting the sabre-tooth tiger out of the bag”
“Polarik’s final report: Obama’s ‘Born’ Conspiracy”
“Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud”
By Ron Polarik, PhD
The Seal is actually a 2008 Seal! And the Registrar’s stamp is actually a 2008 Registrar stamp!
We saw the effects of this cobbling together of COLB features on the Seals. The front view of the Seal should look vastly different from the reverse, given the change in angles and in the Seal itself, yet the reverse side Seal image perfectly overlays the front side Seal image — except for the 25% cropped of the top of the Seal as shown on the reverse side COLB photo. There is no logical or acceptable reason for not including the entire Seal in at least two photos made of the back side. Likewise, there is no logical or defensible reason for doing any cutting on the Seal, let alone the 20-30% sliced off the top of the Seal. The front view has the fold bisecting the top part of the Seal and is at a 30 degree angle from the bottom part.
.Basically, when you are mindful of the perspective at which the document was allegedly photographed, you begin to see the unreality of the elements depicted in those photos. Round Seals that should be elliptical. Flat Seals that should be bent at an angle. Seals illuminated in ways that are technically impossible. Seal sides that should be different, but are the same. Parts of Seals intentionally cropped out of photos. Seals that appear on different types of paper never used for COLBs. Taken together, all of the attempts at creating a convincing illusion of a real Seal on a real COLB actually failed to do so. Instead, these bogus Seals represent an intentional ruse used to fool the public.
As noted above, one of the photos (birth_certificate_1.jpg) was made from a real Seal on a real COLB, that was subsequently Photoshopped to eradicate features that are not present on the bogus Seals.
The macro shot of the Seal from almost the height of the paper, shows two major anomalies: the text fields off in the distance are either out-of-focus or not in the photo at all. Test shots of a real Seal confirm that all of the fields should be visible, albeit, as dark blurry lines. There are two lines of text missing, and there are no natural reasons that explain their absence, such as overexposure from a light source.
The center of the Seal and paper also appears to have been compromised by tool work (Photoshop image too), and not by any beam of light.
The texture of the Seal in all shots is also unrealistic, especially in the close-up of #1. The texture is suggestive of hand-engraving a photo of a Seal to make it look raised or embossed. The fact that the word, “of,” and interior sections of the letters, such as the slanted lines that connect the two parallel lines of an “M”, or an”N”, are absent, confirms that this Seal is not real.
To put it bluntly, the Factcheck photos have been “Frankensteined,” just as the Factcheck scan image was cobbled together with the parts of different COLBs. The use of the term, “document” is simply for expediency sake, as no, single “real” document was used for these photos or for the scan image.
To: Kevmo; pissant; LucyT
Excellent, Polarik. Now you can start on that book and make money from this debacle.
Thank you, Kevmo. Believe me, I will do that book when all the dust settles.
I’m well on my way. This report came out to 100 printed pages, and it is being sent as evidence to a number of lawyers.
Tomorrow, Janet Porter and a TV crew from Illuminati TV are going to videotape me as I present my report results.
BTW, were you able to listen to the radio show?
Comment found at Free Republic:
The version posted on 0bama’s website has OHBM in the lower left corner. The folded copy with serial number which has appeared in photographs has OHSM in the lower left corner.
A case of too many forgers spoiling the broth ?
69 posted on Sunday, November 23, 2008 6:48:17 AM by ComputerGuy
Thanks to thinkingmom11 for helping me to find what I was looking for.
One reply to FR Comment Above:
To: ComputerGuy; Polarik
If you look, all versions but the one posted on FTS has OHSM in the lower left corner, not just the photographed one. I’m curious as to why Polarik didn’t mention this and explain why there appears to be two versions. Perhaps it was a typo that was fixed but they forgot to send the corrected version to FTS?
Phil Berg Barack Obama Ron Polarik Jeff Schreiber Michelle Obama Chief Editor Korir African Press International API