“Berg’s Lawsuit Tossed By Judge For Lack Of Standing”

by

“… questions remain as to whether the birth certificate produced by the Obama campaign as proof he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961 is a forged document persist.”

Re: forged document

Polarik’s blog, although nothing new posted there since 08 22 08

http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/

Since 08 22 08, Polarik has published his findings at Free Republic:

“Polarik’s Final Report: Obama’s ‘Born’ Conspiracy Part One” 09 17 08

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2084512/posts

Since 09 17 08, Polarik has published updates.

Polarik Comments at Free Republic:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:polarik/index?brevity=full;tab=comments

Here’s one of many posts on Polarik’s findings at RosettaSister:

https://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/%E2%80%9Cthese-are-not-scanner-artifacts-or-jpg-artifacts-and-you-will-never-be-able-to-produce-this-pattern-using-any-scanner-or-any-jpg-compression%E2%80%9D-ron-polarik/

http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/2008/10/bergs-lawsuit-tossed-by-judge-for-lack.html

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick has shielded Sen. Barack Obama from having to answer questions about whether he qualifies as a “natural born” citizen as required of a candidate for president of the United States. Late on Friday Judge Surrick, a Democrat, issued a 34-page decision dismissing a complaint filed by attorney Philip J. Berg in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for lack of standing on Berg’s part. The standing issue was always a big hurdle for Berg. He earlier said he would appeal the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, but with only 10 days remaining before the November election, Berg’s chances of success are very remote. I should point out that there are suits pending in eight other states raising similar questions that Berg’s lawsuit raised.

Meanwhile, questions remain as to whether the birth certificate produced by the Obama campaign as proof he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961 is a forged document persist. Check out this birth certificate issued by the State of Hawaii in 1963. Compare it to Obama’s certificate of birth, which can be found here. A Newsmax story notes several major differences. “In addition to naming the hospital and more details about the baby, the 1963 vault copy also includes the “usual residence of the mother,” and the “usual occupation” of the father,” the story reads. “None of this information appears on the 2007 Live Birth certificate produced by the Obama campaign.” America’s Right Blogger Jeff Schreiber observes that Obama mentions in his book that he once held the original birth certificate. Schreiber writes:

Ironically, Obama mentions his birth certificate in passing on Page 26 of his 1995 memoir, “Dreams of My Father.” “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school,” he wrote.

The birth certificate produced by Obama is not the original long version certificate which would have been issued to his mother at the time of his birth, and which is presumably the birth certificate Obama references in his book. The birth certificate posted by the Obama campaign purports to have been received from the State of Hawaii in June, 2007. Attorney Philip J. Berg claims to have a recorded phone conversation with Obama’s paternal grandmother from Kenya, who claims she was present for Obama’s birth, which she says occurred in Kenya.

Advance Indiana

Thread at Hillary Clinton Forum:

“Law Suit Against Obama dismissed, appeal under way (America‘s Right)”

http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=38279

Phil Berg Barack Obama Ron Polarik Jeff Schreiber Michelle Obama Chief Editor Korir African Press International API

3 Responses to ““Berg’s Lawsuit Tossed By Judge For Lack Of Standing””

  1. Al Says:

    Disheartening news at best, Rosettasister, however one cannot blame Mr. Berg for simply loving his country and doing his patriotic duty. None of this would even be going on if Senator Obama simply released his original birth-certificate.

    http://clearblogs.com/larry/

  2. Ted Says:

    Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!

  3. rosettasister Says:

    Thanks, Ted!

    I needed a pick me up!

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: