Ron Polarik “Part II is being held back for the moment, and we’re waiting for Obama and the DNC to make their move.” Phil Berg v Barack Obama

by

“Seems like I’m always ahead of the curve.” – Ron Polarik

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2094426/posts

To: pissant

Seems like I’m always ahead of the curve.

ONe thing that the article failed to mention is that you can retain the Exif data if you so desire.

We are way beyond the point of saying that FactCheck and everyone with whom they are associated, are NOT idiots with a camera. They know EXACTLY what they are doing.

The vaunted Israel Insider passed it off as “incompetence” on their part, but, and here’s a preview, FactCheck did quite a bot of forging of their own, on the photos they took. Do people really beleive that FactCheck was NOT paying attention to what I was finding over the past three to four months? Do they think that it was a coincidence that they specifically tried to dismiss my research in their article with the same, WRONG answers? Ah, no. They have been very diligent in learning what NOT to show in their photographs. “Pixel halos,” as they intentionally called them, was the first challenge for them to Photoshop away. But, I’ve got so much more to tell. It’s just finding the time to do it.

14 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:43:38 PM by Polarik

To: diefree

You need to go back a few months to when it was explained. BTW, that question was one of the original complaints lodged against it.

Basically, Barack Sr. was a Kenyan citizen, and AFRICAN is what he was

15 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:48:45 PM by Polarik

To: pissant

You might wish to pass this along:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2086586/posts

16 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 8:01:56 PM by Polarik

To: nobama08

According to Phil Berg, the birth certificate issue is meaningless:

“Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband.”

17 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:08:41 PM by Peerless

To: dodger

‘NATURAL’ born citizens are born abroad from at least one US citizen parent

Not exactly.

first of all, the laws are nowhere near being as specific as you make them out to be.

Secondly, the laws that were on the books at the time when Obama was born DO apply — current laws do not go back in time to 1961 andf over turn the laws that were in effect. Pp> Also, there are no provisions for “Grandfathering” in Obama who became “naturalized” later on.

84 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 6:04:24 PM by Polarik

To: pissant

Except he has freeper Polarik on his team now. And the COLB is a fraudulent document

Thank you, Pissant. And the factCheck photos are even more fraudulent. Part II is being held back for the moment, and we’re waiting for Obama and the DNC make their move.

114 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:20:44 PM by Polarik

To: Kevmo

***He’s playing softball here. Usually such a motion is filed with a request for a contempt charge when the subpoenas are not honored.

Have you read Berg’s request for Denial of DNC’s motion to dismiss, along with his recently updated complaint and restatement of his Discovery request?

Phil cannot ask for contempt charges from the Judge until after the Judge rules on Berg’s Request to reject their Motion to Dismiss.

After the Judge denies their Motion to Dismiss, THEN, they will automatically be liable for contempt if they fail to comply the Judge’s order.

46 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:33:27 PM by Polarik

To: LucyT

Thanks, Polarik.

[Scratches tinfoil off shopping list.]

You’re welcome, but here’s something you need to know:

It’s a good idea to change your IP address and passwords because there are hackers out there working for Obama.

True!

5,951 posted on Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:42:59 PM by Polarik

See also:

http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/1-main/27-alert-contrary-to-internet-rumor-there-has-not-yet-been-a-court-ruling-on-obama-dnc-motion-to-dismiss

On Mr. Berg’s behalf, I am posting this to state clearly the Court has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss in Berg v. Obama.

Here’s the status:

  1. Last week Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss the Berg v. Obama lawsuit.
  2. On Monday, Mr. Berg filed an answer requesting that the suit not be dismissed and that the Court order production of documents proving Senator Obama’s consitutional qualifications to serve as President of The United States.
  3. As of 1 AM EST today, October 2nd, 2008, the Court has not ruled on the Motion for Dismissal in Berg v. Obama.

Obama Crimes Webmaster

See also:

http://www.americasright.com/2008/10/berg-v-obama-update-wednesday-october-2.html

Obama Birth Certificate

One Response to “Ron Polarik “Part II is being held back for the moment, and we’re waiting for Obama and the DNC to make their move.” Phil Berg v Barack Obama”

  1. Madonna Attempts To Tackle Sarah Palin with Political Humor: Fail Says:

    […] Ron Polarik “Part II is being held back for the moment, and we’re … […]

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: