Ron Polarik “We will get to see the real Obama documents, providing, of course, IF he does not default on the order for discovery.” Obama Birth Certificate

by

Discovery Space Shuttle

Fraud in the U.S.A.: FactCheck swaps high-res photos with crappy low-res ones!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2086586/posts

To: itsPatAmerican

Have you ever run a popular website? Serving out a popular 2mb image is expensive. I know you want to see this as a tactic to discredit your hard work (which I think is flawed in that it discounts the effects of jepg compression)—and I’m not saying it’s not. I’m just saying that there are other reasons they’d pull the high res image. Have you called them out on this? I’d be interested in hearing their ‘reasons’. You definitely have a point to make with them. I just don’t think your explanation is the only viable one, and I hate jumping to conclusions. I believe in “truth” over “what I want to hear.”

I’ve called them four times and emailed them seven times when their first story (June 16) and second stort (August 21) came out. When they heard the name, “Polarik,” on the phone, they declined to comment and said that, “All the information you need is on our website. Forget about the emails — they’ve been trashed long ago.

There are no other reasons to change a 2 MB file into a 200K file, except to make it impossible to analyze. Fight the Smears did the exact, same thing, goping from a 1025 x 1000 px to a 585 x 575 px, which isn’t even a proportional change (different aspect ratio).

Here’s what is still in their article:

You can click on the photos to get full-size versions, which haven’t been edited in any way, except that some have been rotated 90 degrees for viewing purposes.

They said that they have not changed a thing. Besides the obvious 90% reduction in quality, there’s lots of other “edits.”

To paraphrase Emily Barrett Browning, “How have I Photoshopped there? Let me count the ways.” At last count, I was up to a dozen deliberate Photoshop manipulations.”

What would be their excuse for leaving the same links posted, the ones that still have the original size? Didn’t get around to it? Forgot to change it?

It fails the “Stink” test.

12 posted on Saturday, September 20, 2008 2:23:18 PM by Polarik

To: LucyT; pissant; et al

Need a major ping on this one. For immediate release.

FactCheck’s virtual admission of fraud!

First of all, I want to let everyone know that I have uploaded ALL of FactCheck’s original high quality, large file size photos that they secretly and swiftly swapped with crappy, puny file size ones. Click on this album link to see the original photos

Next, take a look at the list of FactCheck’s photos in the upper left-hand corner of their web page, Born in the U.S.A., and take notice of their original file sizes and hyperlinks that they have not rewritten.

By subjecting the original set of COLB photos to these extreme percentages of file compression, without also reducing the image sizes, what you get are photos that look as large as the original ones, but are blurry, fuzzy, and totally useless for detecting any detail in them,

detail, that someone like myself, just might use to prove that FactCheck intentionally altered their photos and scan image to perpetuate a fraud on the American public.

I’d like to point out THE most important statement that FactCheck made, and that still exists, in their “Born in the USA” story:

You can click on the photos to get full-size versions, which haven’t been edited in any way, except that some have been rotated 90 degrees for viewing purposes.

On the basis of this statement alone, FactCheck has just shot themselves right in the head. This is not an “inconsistently” in their story, but a death blow to it.

Your Honor, the Prosecution has just begun to rest its case.

28 posted on Saturday, September 20, 2008 10:43:16 PM by Polarik

To: LucyT

Polarik’s Part II.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2084512/posts?page=41#41

Well, this is not Part II..it’s just an addendum to Part One, and also a lead in for the real PII/

5,834 posted on Saturday, September 20, 2008 11:38:24 PM by Polarik

To: Smokin’ Joe

Was there a change in personnel about the time of Obama’s birth which would be indicated on the COLB by virtue of the signatories? If so this would enable someone in the know to date the certificate within the tenure of the signatories, and might prove the undoing of the claim of DOB.

Hawaii has become extremely tight-lipped about anything having to do with BHO. Onaka has been the only State Registrar that Hawaii has had since they became a state in 1959.

We’ll just need to see what happens when Berg’s motion for discovery is responded to.

49 posted on Sunday, September 21, 2008 8:24:14 AM by Polarik

To: TheNewPundit

“As the smartest person in this forum, I’ll just leave you kids to your continued stupidity.”

News flash, NewPuntit. You wouldn’t even be the smartest person in a room full of mops. Truly smart people don’t need to denigrate others and use epithets to make their point. You’re no different than any of the other A-hole trolls who have come on here, who also think they are “smart,” and who think that their stuff don’t smell.

Even a parrot can learn to say the same things that you say:

Ark. other issues. Ark, No proof. Ark, pretty Boy. Polly want a cracker.”

If I do continue to say brilliant things regarding this issue…

You mean like this “brilliant” brain fart?

a few more retards will tell me that their investigative team has proven a scan to not be an original despite the fact that if something is scanned that means it isn’t an original..

Wow, what insight! Did it take you three months to come up with this earth-shaking discovery? No one here has ever said that a scan is the same thing as an original document.

..and it can’t be used to verify if the document that was scanned is real or forgery.

Exactly which part of “No one here has ever said anything about a document being forged” did you NOT understand? Are you always this far off the mark, NewPutin? We know that a scanned image was made of a real document. What we are saying is that the scanned image was altered to make it look like a different document.

When FactCheck says that their images were “not altered in any way,” and then posts altered images, that’s what we call,”lying.”

If you were really smart, that you would grasp the gravity of the issue here: that while McCain has been fully vetted to be POTUS, and has already shown his original paper birth certificate to the media, members of Congress, and the court, Obama never has been vetted to be POTUS, and has steadfastly refused to present any valid, paper documents to the public, such as his original birth certificate and his current Certification of Live Birth, that attests to when or where he was born.

If Obama is ruled no qualified to become POTUS, all of the other issues you’re so fond of talking about, become meaningless.

And, yes, this is in the legal system, and we will get to see the real Obama documents, providing, of course, IF he does not default on the order for discovery.

61 posted on Sunday, September 21, 2008 9:56:38 AM by Polarik

2 Responses to “Ron Polarik “We will get to see the real Obama documents, providing, of course, IF he does not default on the order for discovery.” Obama Birth Certificate”

  1. LMH Says:

    Ok, then what will the court do if Obama and the DNC default on the order of discovery? My limited legal savey tells me you will win your point. However, still no original documents.

  2. rosettasister Says:

    “what will the court do if Obama and the DNC default on the order of discovery?”

    Good question, LMH!

    I haven’t the faintest idea!

    But I shall persevere.

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: