Ron Polarik – Witness for the Prosecution (Obama Birth Certificate) Philip Berg



We have a further analysis into the Certificate of Live Birth documents (COLB) posted on Mr. Obama’s website,

The COLB posted and analyzed on the Daily Kos and the COLB posted by, were found to be altered and forged.

Ron Polarik specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers, and typewriters. He holds a PhD in Instructional Media, took on this project, prior to our asking, and has been working on it for several months.

Mr. Polarik has prepared an updated and extensive report regarding these forgeries and altered COLBS. Mr. Polarik took it a step further and obtained further review to collaborate his findings.

See also:

Please see comments section below for latest Polarik comments at Free Republic.

One Response to “Ron Polarik – Witness for the Prosecution (Obama Birth Certificate) Philip Berg”

  1. rosettasister Says:

    To: JerseyDvl
    Read up about Phil Berg’s lawsuit served to Obama requesting expedited discovery of everything that shows Obama’s to be a fraud and not constitutioonally qualified to run for POTUS:
    And, also, presenting a fraudulent birth certificate as proof of citizenship.

    5,806 posted on Friday, September 19, 2008 6:39:14 AM by Polarik

    To: dodger
    Like it or not, both McCain & Bama are ‘Natural Born Citizens’ by virtue of at least one parent having been a US citizen — regardless of where in the world each was actually born.
    Like it or not, if Obama was born in Kenya, Canada, Venesuela, or on board a ship outside the territorial waters of the US, Obama would not be a “Natural born citizen.” His US citizenship was imputed to him, not at birth but when he becane an adult, by virtue of his mom being a US citizen.
    Yes, Obama is now a US citizen., but NO, he is not natural born if he was born outside the US.

    66 posted on Friday, September 19, 2008 7:06:33 AM by Polarik

    To: HD1200
    FactCheck, owned and operated by Obama funders and supporters, is about as nonpartisan as Obama and the Communist Party.
    Hence, I recommend that we call them FactChoke from now on.

    16 posted on Friday, September 19, 2008 9:02:08 AM by Polarik

    To: conservativegramma
    Thank You!!!!!!!!! What a relief, FINALLY, somebody who has been thinking the same thing I have!!!!!
    You’re welcome. Talking about connecting the dots, that’s exactly what I did when I saw and heard Obama Bin Laden give the keynote address at the 2004 DNC. It was then when he said,
    “If there’s an Arab-American family being rounded up without benefit of an attorney or due process, that threatens my civil liberties.”
    Three years after 9/11, Obama sounded exactly like a spokesman for CAIR, HLF, or any of the other, radical Islamic funding source that poses as a “Muslim social service organization,” who wishes to impose Sharia law in the US.
    I took note that Obama — the alleged “Black citizen of the US — spoke only about the rights of Arab-Americans, not Black Americans, or Christian Americans, or Jewish Americans.
    And when he said in his “Audacity” book that,
    “In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans, for example, have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging”
    We heard nothing about the real victims of 9/11!
    Then, right after that excerpt, Obama made his now infamous quote:
    “I will stand with them when the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
    Is there anyone here who did not get that when Obama said “them,” he was talking about what Arabs and Pakistanis have in common, namely Islam.
    Well, we should at least know why Pakistanis were mentioned.

    38 posted on Friday, September 19, 2008 9:27:26 AM by Polarik

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: