Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery – “WND could have had an exclusive, and they blew it, bigtime.” (Polarik)

by

New FactCheck evidence reinforces my forgery claims

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2070896/posts

What do you do when you have to remove evidence that does not support your claims?

Easy. I provide other evidence that does support my claims…

Like the overuse of Photoshop’s DODGE tool to artificially lighten the fold and erase the text on the left-hand side.

Like creating an iridescent area in the Seal

Like the background being comprised of two long, stretched lines instead of two short lines that should be separated by white space.

Like intentionally cutting off the top of the Seal because it was applied BEFORE the COLB was folded.

Like having a well-defined second fold that can be seen in the photos, but that cannot be seen in the image, even under image enhancement. Like making the deepest Seal impression ever seen in a 2007-2008 COLB.

Like never showing all of these pieces in one complete photo

It just keeps getting better and better.

Stay tuned for more.

Polarik Comments:

To: Polarik

CORRECTION:

I meant to say that the COLB was folded BEFORE the embossed Seal stamp was applied.

This caused a tear in the COLB which they taped up with Scotch tape before taking photos of the front side of the COLB.

It is the reason why all of the photos of the reverse side of the COLB only show the Seal below the tear.

It is also why all of the in-focus photos of the front side of the COLB show it with the folds at 90 degree angles, why the one photo of the expanded COLB is out of focus, and why the close-up of the lower fold on the front side was excessively lightened to hide the tear.

12 posted on Saturday, August 30, 2008 7:37:54 AM by Polarik

To: Polarik

It does look like there is some distortion of the seal near the fold. Shouldn’t the seal have been placed on it BEFORE it was folded thus resulting in zero distortion? Not that I know anything about Hawaiian birth certificates but if Hussein isn’t what he claims then I’m all for someone bringing it to light.

Check my correction on Comment #12 below. I originally said that the Seal was placed on the COLB before it was folded, which is standard operating procedure for placing an embossed seal on a document.

What I wanted to say was that the Seal was applied AFTER it was folded, which required the person who applied the stamp to use excessive force so that the Seal would show up on the Seal.

The depth of the impression left on the paper is highly unusual given that the other 2007 COLBs and the 2008 COLB I looked at had a much lighter impression from the Seal.

This excessive pressure caused the COLB to tear where the fold meets the Seal, and is the It is the reason why all of the photos of the reverse side of the COLB only show the Seal below the tear.

It is also why all of the in-focus photos of the front side of the COLB show it with the folds at 90 degree angles, why the one photo of the expanded COLB is out of focus, and why the close-up of the lower fold on the front side was excessively lightened to hide the tear.

Also, for what it’s worth, the rough texture of the paper on which the COLB was printed is not found on 2007-08 COLL=BS.

13 posted on Saturday, August 30, 2008 7:53:17 AM by Polarik

To: Polarik

TYPO alert

In my response above, I should have said that because of the fold, the embossed Seal was applied with excessive force to ensure that the Seal impression lookedwas evenly through the fold., I should have said said …the Seal was applied AFTER it was folded, which required the use of excessive force so that the Seal would be clearly visible through the fold.

14 posted on Saturday, August 30, 2008 8:18:58 AM by Polarik

To: itsthejourney

I usually shun WND but this perked my interest.

I used to read WND daily. I’ve also had one of my Letters to the Editor chosen as “Letter of the Week.”

HOWEVER, they never published ANY of my letters that were critical of Obama, going all the way back to 2004. Even now, when the multitude of their readers are now getting wise to Obama, my NObama letters are being ignored.

Also ignored was the research I sent to them right after the Daily Kos published the Obama COLB image forgery. Instead, they ran the story that the Israel Insider published, well after my research, that did mention my research.

But, WND could have had an exclusive, and they blew it, bigtime.

17 posted on Saturday, August 30, 2008 9:18:47 AM by Polarik

4 Responses to “Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery – “WND could have had an exclusive, and they blew it, bigtime.” (Polarik)”

  1. Jamie Holts Says:

    I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work 🙂

  2. NOBAMANOWAY Says:

    I’m noticing a limey green haze around the certificate number, the color of the mesh is more limey than the other green.

  3. Joan Says:

    I’m concerned about Obama going to Hawaii. He could have very easily had someone meet with another person, who then met with another, etc. until they were able to correct the errors in the existing COLB and say that yes, there was one put out there to discredit him, but NOW we have the real one, thus painting O the victim again! You know, use the person chain so no connection could be made with O and the Hawaii Vital Statistics Department. I have never seen so much corruption by so few determined to steal an election. Leah Daughtry, CEO of the Democratic National Committe, Donna Brazileand Alexis Herman, to name a few leading the charge on May 31st.
    It Worked in the primary, but I do not see it working in November. Hillary handed McCain the perfect offense, and they are able to capitalize on it.

    The power of money walking, talking and stalking, defines this campaign.

    Keep on with your offense. Force the media to start reporting what is really happening instead of this “Rags to Riches” story!

  4. rosettasister Says:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2067874/posts

    To: Red Steel
    Since I have not heard nothing but crickets about the statements above, I’ll give them my plausible answer.
    I’ve only posted the answer to this like a dozen times already, so why not do it again.
    Alvin T. Onaka, MD, is the State Registrar, but not that long ago, Onaka also became the Head of the Office of Health Status Monitoring.
    Because of having two roles to fulfill, Onaka does not even see these paper COLBS or the requests for them any more. Now he has a staff member stamping his signature block, the date the COLB was stamped, and also the embossed Seal.
    In other words, Onaka has not ACCEPTED a COLB since he became the Head of the OHSM — but has the COLB “FILED” by the office staff.

    55 posted on Saturday, August 30, 2008 3:33:28 PM by Polarik

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: