Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery for Mere Mortals (Polarik – Techdude – TexasDarlin – Israel Insider)


What are the Vortexes of Sedona?

Polarik explains at Free Republic:

TRO Denied; Obama Can Still Run — For Now

Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:45:59 PM · 61 of 81

Polarik to bvw

What are you claiming TechDude lied about?

What non-existent evidence did he fabricate?

Why do you say TechDude was a fraud?

First of all, I never trusted TechDude from the start and was suspicious of some of his claims, including the Hollywood-like “dead rabbit” in the mailbox trick, but I kept my thoughts to myself because Texas Darling and I are friends, and I did not wish to embarrass a friend who had trusted TechDude.

I did, however, tell Texas Darling not to trust him.

Now that the Israel Insider gave TechDude the boot for not doing what he promised he would do, it was now time for me to tell what I know.

TechDude’s research was a house of cards build upon his claim of receiving several image and paper COLB’s from the years 2001 to 2003, and 2006 to 2008. When I saw his 2001-03 collection, I recognized them right off the bat as rehashes of the only existing COLBs on the Internet, such as those belonging to PD, Tomoyasu, and Smith.

This is also the reason why Techdude did not present any COLBs from 2004 & 2005 — because none existed online.

TechDude went on to say that 2006 and 2007 COLBs had borders that were identical to Michele’s 2008 border. TechDude figured that nobody had ever seen what a real 2006 and 2007 COLB looked like, and his claim would go unchallenged.

He was dead wrong.

I received two real 2007 COLB images, and not only did they NOT have the same border as 2008 COLBS, they also bore a striking resemblance to the border on the 2007 Obama COLB image.

If ever there was a “smoking gun” to his deceit, this was it.

I should also like to add that I tried using his methodology (and mine) to look for any traces of Maya Soetoro, but found nothing — which was as expected because I had already postulated six weeks ago that the existing text has been covered up with pieces of the background, thereby obliterating any of the previous text.

He also stole ideas from me when he went public on Atlas Shruggs with his “Exclusive.” That upper-left border comparison was in an image I sent to him.

It sucked to sit on the sidelines while TechDude was sgetting all the accolades, and it also sucks now, because since the arguments raised against his research are now validated, it casts a pall on mine — even though I stand behind everything I’ve done, and have never resorted to any tomfoolery to prove a point.

My critics will disagree, but only because they cannot refute them.

Sisterrosetta here: My husband and I are heading up to Sedona, Arizona today. God only knows what might happen up there. We might get swallowed up by one of those vortexes.

9 Responses to “Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery for Mere Mortals (Polarik – Techdude – TexasDarlin – Israel Insider)”

  1. Leeballz Says:

    I went to school in Flagstaff and spent lots of time hiking around Sedona and driving my truck down Schnebly Hill road. I have many hours I can’t account for there, but I think that has to do with Vodka and Mushrooms and not vortexes. But just in case you may want to bring some camping supplies. 🙂

  2. Cao Says:

    A bunch of us stayed in Sedona for a few days and we had the greatest time. It’s beautiful, scenic, and unlike any other place in the country. New agers think of it as a ‘spiritual place’ and it does feel very “different”. We spent time with a psychic who told interesting stories about the vibrations…which was a real hoot.

  3. rosettasister Says:

    “driving my truck down Schnebly Hill road. I have many hours I can’t account for there”

    I know that road well, Leeballz.

    Are you sure you weren’t abducted by aliens?!

    I’m sure you’ve heard of the Phoenix Lights!

  4. rosettasister Says:

    it does feel very “different”

    You are so right, Cao.

    We first visited here in 1986 on Easter Sunday. Our daughter had just been born the previous September.

    I must admit I did get a little tired of taking visiting relatives to Disney World. But I never tired of taking them to Graceland. And the same holds true of Sedona.

    Just to make sure I’m up on these things, I did pick up a copy of the following:

    “What Is A Vortex? Sedona’s Vortex Sites A Practical Guide”

  5. Leeballz Says:

    rosettasister Says:

    August 29, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    Are you sure you weren’t abducted by aliens?!

    I’m sure you’ve heard of the Phoenix Lights!

    No, I’m not sure I wasn’t abducted by aliens. Do you know something I don’t? 🙂

    As for the Phoenix Lights, I am familiar. Last night there were some interesting lights too. There was a huge flash lightning storm where the clouds were flashing like they were talking to each other. There was a constant rumble of thunder and the clouds were singing along. I’ve never seen or heard anything like it. I’m not saying there were aliens or anything like that, but it was very very entertaining to watch.

  6. rosettasister Says:


    You’re a poet!

  7. Maya Soetoro’s birth certificate « Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored Says:

    […] Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery for Mere Mortals (Polarik – Techdude – TexasDarlin – … […]

  8. Primo Says:

    Mr. Berg,
    Your foolish websites, blogs, lawsuits, etc. about the issue of the President’s citizenship is nothing more than a thin veil to make a mockery on the citizen of the Untied States.
    Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
    • Anyone born inside the United States *
    • Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
    • Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
    • Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
    • Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
    • Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
    • Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
    • A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
    * There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
    Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date. For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States. Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive.
    Perhaps, you should post this good law and statutory language on your website so that the people will grasp a clear understanding about what the law says about what constitutes “citizens of the United States at birth”. But, as expected, you won’t even bother post this law on your websites, blogs or elsewhere, because you know your position regarding the Constitution is patently frivolous; indeed, a fact found by all Courts you have filed papers with.

  9. rosettasister Says:

    Thanks for your input, Primo.

    If you’d like to see most recent post:


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: