“Israel Insider – late to the party, as usual?” Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery (Polarik – Israel Insider)


I feel like I’ve just arrived from outer space and the only option I have at my disposal to understand the human race are the comments left at various blogs.

It seems like the various factions who are the main actors in this mystery and their supporters have gone to opposite sides of the room as though this were a Democratic caucus in the Lone Star State.

Polarik definitely has issues with Techdude. I thought for awhile there that TexasDarlin had backed away from Techdude’s findings as well.

Then it seemed that Polarik had alienated TexasDarlin or vice versa. Why? I don’t know. Forgive me, I must have looked away for a second or two.

Now it seems Polarik is dissing Israel Insider. I’m pretty sure it has something to do with Techdude. I believe Israel Insider has also distanced himself from Techdude’s findings.

Polarik wrote of a trio which originally was supposed to work together and present their findings together. I know two of the three were Polarik and Techdude. But I don’t know the identity of the third member of the trio. Judah Benjamin?

One cannot exclude the enormous contributions of Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs) who I believe worked in concert with Techdude. I would love to know where she stands on that issue now.

And the latest actor to enter this stage is, of course, Philip J. Berg, Esquire. Here is an article about him and his lawsuit entitled “Will Obama Ever Face the Press?”


Feel free to comb through the following comments if you are so inclined.

As for me, I’d better get back on my spacecraft before it’s too late!

Polarik, et al comments at Free Republic:


To: SE Mom; TommyDale; nikos1121; Calpernia; LucyT; fanfan; BossLady


Israel Insider – late to the party, as usual.

Here’s a Fact Check:

It’s been almost twelve weeks since this fraud surfaced from the Obama swamp, and I’ve survived the usual, empty rhetoric of the Lefties who love to say that white is black, fully expecting the rest of us to nods our heads in agreement.

I recommend that we do not engage them in conversation, because they will always subvert it when they are stumped for answers. One, in particular, sounds more like a trained parrot than provocateur, with “Ark…no it’s not,” “Ark…no he didn’t,” “Ark..your full of @##$%”

Anyway, you get my drift.

My favorite of all the canned responses I’ve heard for these past 12 weeks is that “scanner artifacts” are to blame for everything and anything they cannot answer. I’m still waiting for someone to show me “scanner artifacts” between some letters and not others.

Forget about Googling it, or foraging on Photobucket for it, there are no images of “Scanner artifacts” anywhere on the Internet. But, does that stop the critics from claiming that “scanner artifacts” rank right up there with BigFoot, the Roswell UFO crash, the Loch Ness monster, and global warming.

In closing, I have to say that it must really bite to be on the wrong side of this issue, and I’m glad that I’m not one of them

The FactCheck paper COLB looks more like it came from the forged image, and not the reverse.

152 posted on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 12:57:36 PM by Polarik

To: rodguy911

Good stuff, when I want an analysis of the validity of a BC I will trust polarik and techdude long before factcheck.

Thanks, but please do not mention Techdude in the same sentence as me.

153 posted on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:00:11 PM by Polarik

To: TheNewPundit

It has not been proven to be a forgery. That is a rumor that won’t die. The issue about a forgery is regarding a scanned image of the certificate. Factcheck held the actual certificate, not a scanned copy. It has the seal and the signature. If he were running around with a fake, the state of Hawaii would take issue.

Care to bet on that? Logic goes right out the window when it comes to Obamassiah and his disciples. Which part of him is NOT crooked?

FactCheck has never produced anything real: printed or imaged. OBama has ducked it as well.

The image is a fake. The paper COLB is a fake. FactCheck forgot to remove some of those “Scanner artifacts” in their photos of it.

155 posted on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:04:46 PM by Polarik

To: centurion316

The substitution must take place after the convention and before the election; it’ll tick off Obama’s supporters, and delegitimize Hilla- er, the eventual substitute — Joe Biden.

158 posted on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:32:44 PM by SunkenCiv

To: pissant

Is the file number irrelevant, as the campaign now claims, or is it a data that could be used to hack into the system, as Hawaii claims. If it is irrelevant, why is Janice Okubo providing excuses for the Obama campaign? If it is dangerous for data security, why is the Obama campaign ignoring that danger?

Of course, this is a red-herring.

Even if it were dangerous, how many people from Hawaii have COLBs with a number on it? Why would only Obama’s be “dangerous” when anyone who knows someone from Hawaii with a COLB could get this information?

Are there no Hawaiian-born hackers who would have this information without Obama’s COLB?


160 posted on Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:37:56 PM by Political Junkie Too

Comments at Israel Insider:


4 Responses to ““Israel Insider – late to the party, as usual?” Decoding Obama Birth Certificate Mystery (Polarik – Israel Insider)”

  1. rosettasister Says:

    See also:


  2. rosettasister Says:

    Polarik and Pissant at Free Republic:

    To: pissant
    Coincidence? Or intentional?
    In every photo of the embossed Seal on the backside of the COLB, the top part is cropped out right where the bottom fold should be.
    Me thinks that it is intentional

    175 posted on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 6:40:14 AM by Polarik

    To: Polarik
    Well, there is no doubt something is well beyond fishy with this whole factcheck thing.

    177 posted on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:35:51 AM by pissant

    To: TheNewPundit
    If you can prove that the FactCheck scanned image is a faithful copy of Obama’s genuine and original paper COLB, ten I’ll give you $1,000
    If you cannot do that, then it means that the FactCheck scanned image is not a faithful copy of Obama’s genuine paper COLB but, is instead, a forged image made to look like a real scan of Obama’s paper COLB. In which case, then you owe me a $1,000.

    179 posted on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:10:22 AM by Polarik

  3. Polarik Says:

    By now, I assume that you’ve heard about Techdude’s fabricated research and “borrowed ideas” — that is what my “issue” with him.

    He stated, categorically, that the 2007 COLBs had the same border as the 2008 COLB — thinking that none would ever see a real 2007 COLB

    Then I got one, and sure enough, it resembled the border on the Obama COLB image.

    That was a game changer for him — but not for me.

  4. rosettasister Says:

    Good morning, Polarik.

    I hope you don’t mind, but I will include your comments in a more recent post.

    Thank you.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: