Latest From Polarik At Free Republic “Tomorrow, I’m blowing the lid off this latest subterfuge.” (Obama Birth Certificate) (Polarik and TexasDarlin)

by

Polarik and TexasDarlin — Private Investigators

· Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery, subverting Obama claims (Uh-oh)

Friday, August 22, 2008 11:34:59 AM · 5,246 of 5,252
Polarik to Fred Nerks

I wonder what Polarik might have to add to enlighten us?

Let’s try this again.

Good grief, what don’t I have? These bird-brains dissed some of my early analyses thatare as true today as they were two months ago. Of course, they gave us the old line about the gray pixel halos being only “artifacts from the scanner.” Yeah, right.

Here’s what I’ve found on FactCheck’s original SCAN that do not match their counterparts on this “new” COLB PHOTO, and/or on my 2007 COLB photos and images:

WRONG PATTERN AND DEFINITION OF BORDERS ON SCAN

WRONG SHAPE AND CONSISTENCY OF BORDERS ON SCAN

WRONG LOCATION OF SIGNATURE STAMP ON SCAN

NEARLY INVISIBLE SIGNATURE STAMP ON SCAN

WRONG IMPRESSION OF SIGNATURE STAMP ON SCAN

WRONG LOCATION OF DATE STAMP ON PHOTO

DATE STAMP TOO FAR FROM BOTTOM OF SEAL ON PHOTO

EMBOSSED SEAL IS MUCH LARGER ON PHOTO

EMBOSSED SEAL IS CLEARLY DEFINED ON PHOTO

ONE BARELY VISIBLE FOLD ON SCAN

WRONG LOCATION OF LOWER FOLD ON PHOTO

“ANY ALTERATIONS…” TOO WIDE ON SCAN

More to come. Stay tuned…

· Born in the U.S.A.

Friday, August 22, 2008 6:12:11 AM · 59 of 61
Polarik to justlurking

And there is a sharp fold in the document that didn’t show up in the scan. But, it does have the weird mis-alignment of the borders in the four corners.

Woese than that, its borders do not have the wierd sh*t that the borders in the scanned image has. Not even closes.

The Seal and signature block were NEVER one on top of the other.

· Born in the U.S.A.

Friday, August 22, 2008 6:09:50 AM · 58 of 61
Polarik to Baladas

br>
“Of course, it’s distantly possible that Obama’s grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.

I’m going to b*tch-slap those smug faces right off of them.

· Born in the U.S.A.

Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:24:02 PM · 56 of 61
Polarik to Baladas

Bogus, bogus, bogus, keep them COLB’s are bogus. keep them COLB’s are bogus, RawHide.

Yee-haw!

· Born in the U.S.A.

Thursday, August 21, 2008 10:20:59 PM · 55 of 61
Polarik to Kevmo

Of course, if Polarik got a look at the original evidence and could compare it to the scanned in version, I’m willing to bet the two documents wouldn’t be a match. That’s why we don’t see a scanned in version of the document the factcheck guys are holding.

Well, I don’t know what to do from here. It is something beyond our capabilities unless that lawsuit bears some fruit. The fact remains that what is up on the fightthesmears website is a most likely a forgery.

Try an “etched in stone” forgery.

Tomorrow, I’m blowing the lid off this latest subterfuge.

I’m taking no prisoners.

See also:

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/factcheckorg-has-new-birth-certificate-story/

UPDATE 1: I agree with Old Atlantic’s comment:

“We don’t know about name changes, parents, guardians, etc. We also know that Hawaii can issue a colb for out of state birth. Obama didn’t grant permission to Hawaii to answer all questions or release the file. Why did Okubo say, according to a recent press report, that Hawaii contacted the Obama campaign and got no response? What about releasing the files in Indonesia? What about the US passport files? What about Obama authorizing any country, state, school, or religious institution to release all records and post them on the internet?

Why doesn’t Obama answer the questions about Indonesia, including having a passport instead of this? This is a blow off.

Why doesn’t Obama authorize former Harvard students to talk about him? Others he knew? Disclose who paid for Harvard?”

UPDATE 2: Reader KSDB also makes good points:

“There’s part of this story that doesn’t add up: This is FactCheck’s comment:

‘We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning Obama’s citizenship. The campaign then rushed to release the document, and the rush is responsible for the blacked-out certificate number. Says Shauna: “[We] couldn’t get someone on the phone in Hawaii to tell us whether the number represented some secret information, and we erred on the side of blacking it out. Since then we’ve found out it’s pretty irrelevant for the outside world.” The document we looked at did have a certificate number; it is 151 1961 – 010641.’

Obama’s campaign is saying they ‘rushed’ to release the document and couldn’t get help from the DOH on deciding what to do about the number.

Now this is from the Honolulu Advertiser:

‘Health officials contacted the Obama campaign a few months ago in response to the persistent inquiries “to see if they could try and resolve the issue with the people who were asking questions,” she said.’

A few months ago should have been BEFORE Obama’s campaign ‘rushed’ to post the document. We’re supposed to believe they couldn’t figure out whether it was safe to use the number?? Further, Okubo says:

‘”The thing that’s redacted is just our file number,” she said. “Potentially, if you have that number, you could break into the system.”‘

So we have Obama’s peeps saying the number is no big deal and are showing it at FactCheck, yet Okubo, only a week ago, says it might be a big deal. Further, are we really to believe that the DOH wouldn’t cooperate with Obama’s campaign in telling them what to do about the number?? It’s time for these people to start telling the truth.”

3 Responses to “Latest From Polarik At Free Republic “Tomorrow, I’m blowing the lid off this latest subterfuge.” (Obama Birth Certificate) (Polarik and TexasDarlin)”

  1. Leeballz Says:

    So give me a synopsis. I haven’t read up on this story in a while. They still think it’s a forgery?

  2. rosettasister Says:

    Good morning, Leeballz! I would direct you here:

    https://rosettasister.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/polarik-final-report-obamas-born-conspiracy-part-one-obama-birth-certificate/

    But the short answer is, yes, they still think it’s a forgery.

    Philip Berg will be using Polarik’s findings in his lawsuit.

    See below:

    To: Dajjal

    Have you been in contact with Philip Berg’s team yet

    Oh, yeah…I’ll let you know when my report gets posted on his website.

    33 posted on Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:08:58 PM by Polarik

  3. rosettasister Says:

    “Certificate of Live Birth analysis – Part one”

    http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/1-main/17-certificate-of-live-birth-analysis-part-one

    Thursday, 18 September 2008 20:15

    Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: