“OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY: The SMOKING GUN has been found!”

by

http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/2008/07/27/obamas_birth_certificate_forgery_the_smoking_gun_has_been_found!.thtml

http://polarik.blogtownhall.com/

Posted by Polarik on Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:36:29 PM

EXCERPTS

“Sometimes, you don’t always find what it is that you’re seeking on the Internet. At least, not when you could have really used it.

I decided today to search through the web archives to locate other COLB images that have not been seen since their original posting. What I found was downright shocking!

First, props to Brian Ledbetter and his blog, The Snapped Shot, for providing both the references to my original, June 20 post, and for providing what was presented as “proof positive” that the Kos image was genuine. The “proof” provided was an animated GIF showing the DeCosta COLB morphing into the Kos COLB.”

“The bottom line is that the Kos was never a true copy of Obama’s birth record, if it ever existed as a COLB. There is nothing to rule out the copying of parts from a second COLB (such as the background, seal stamp, and date stamp) belonging to someone other than Obama.

To me, this case is closed.

Now, the only thing left for me to do is to follow the same procedure I used to create the Kos clone shown in my previous post (which was made from Michele’s COLB) by using the Decosta COLB as the starting point for the Kos clone.

THEN, we can now bid adieu to the doubters, the detractors, and the debunkers who were way off course with their rebuttals, and welcome back the faithful who never waivered from that nagging feeling that what they were looking at, was a fake!

All hail the DE-KOS-TA image.”

3 Responses to ““OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY: The SMOKING GUN has been found!””

  1. rosettasister Says:

    See also discussion at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2052236/posts

  2. rosettasister Says:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2052236/posts

    Monday, July 28, 2008 6:08:56 AM • 90 of 94

    Polarik to mckenzie7

    The thing that always caused me to doubt the certificate is because his father’s race is entered as African. Now Roger Whittaker is also African, but he is not black. I was under the opinion that back in the 60’s, black people were referred to as Negro. Does anyone else have any thoughts on this?

    I think that since Obama Sr. was a citizen of Kenya, Africa, and not a U.S. citizen, his “RACE” would not be listed as NEGRO or BLACK, in light of your Roger Whittaker fact. The question that should be answered is “How did Hawaii classify the different races of SOUTH AFRICA?

    Monday, July 28, 2008 6:14:12 AM • 91 of 94

    Polarik to SkyDancer; Calpernia; pissant

    The MSM adore BHO so much, that it would take an atom bomb to blow a hole through its collective, thick skull for a story like this to make the news.

    All that someone has to do is raise this question to Obama in a press conference and wait to here his answer.

  3. rosettasister Says:

    If what I had before was a “smoking gun,” then thanks to Koyaan, I got a “smoking RPG.”

    Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:59:08 AM • 24 of 28
    Polarik to pissant
    If what I had before was a “smoking gun,” then thanks to Koyaan, I got a “smoking RPG.”
    Koyaan was trumpeting the Kos COLB as the real deal, just like AJ and his packrats, but unlike them, at least he had some images to show for his work (not that they meant anything)
    Anyway, he compares an image overlay of Michele’s COLB to the Kos COLB, and proclaims, “the aspect ratio on the Michele COLB is messed up. Since I got this of of Polarik’s posting, he must have done something to it.”
    Ah, but now I that bet he wishes he didn’t say it.
    The comment caused me to do my own checking of the aspect ratio (the raio of height compared to width) of the Kos image, Michele’s image, and DeCosta image.
    The aspect ratio of the Kos image is different from that of Michele’s COLB, as Koyaan noted, but the aspect ratio of te Kos image is identical to the DeCosta image.
    Why is this now significant?
    Because the reason why the DeCosta image has a different aspect ratio, is because of the two massive folds present in the paper document. These two big folds caused the paper to be “scrunched down,” making it impssible from copying the full length of the paper document.
    To put it another way, the two folds caused the HEIGHT of the image to be SHORTER than it really is.
    AND…
    Since we know that the Kos image only has ONE THIN FOLD in the entire image, AND…
    if the Kos image was a real copy, then it should have produced an image close to its full height.
    HOWEVER, the almost, if not totally, flat Kos image is exactly the same height as the “scrunched down” DeCosta image.
    And, the odds of that happening are NILL!!!!

    Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:11:45 PM • 26 of 28
    Polarik to x
    >i> It seems to me that if Obama’s mother was American, he’s American, no matter where born. What is the supposition to the contrary?

    According to the law of the day, if Obama were born abroad with a foreign father, his mother would have had to have lived for at least five years in the US after the age of 16. So she would have had to be at least 21 for her son to automatically be born a citizen, and she was only 18 when he was born.

    Actually, I also thought that was the case, but a further check of immigrations rules shows that all Obama’s Mother has to do is live in Hawaii for one continuous year (any year) for OBama to have been a citizen by birth.
    However, even if Obama’s mother had never lived in the US at any time before his birth, Obama acquires derivative US citizenship when his mother lives with him in Hawaii.

    Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:15:18 PM • 27 of 28
    Polarik to pissant
    Well, how do we get Malkin/Coulter/Rush/Hannity/Nat. review/Human events etc to run with this story? >p? mass emails.

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: