
NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS
Contrary to popular belief, Columbus didn’t discover America, the Indians already called this vast land home. With all that is going on in America today regarding rights and prejudices, how many have ever stop to think about how the American Indian has been pushed and shoved since the colonization of America. If anyone has ever had a right to object, then these people had that right. They were forced to move many times as the encroaching colonization of America took hold. We must realize these people were herded away from their lands like animals. And like any person defending their home or territory, the Indians fought to keep their land. This resulted in the establishment of approximately 400 treaties signed with different tribes during the period of 1782 thru 1868. The first treaty I have found dates back to July 9, 1782, known as the Chickasaw Peace Treaty. But alas, many of these treaties were broken and they were pushed further west. I pray that this article will open your eyes and hearts to the atrocities of slavery that befell some of these undeserving peoples.
The Forgotten Story of American Indian Slavery
(Just One of Many Stories of Indian Slavery)
When Americans think of slavery, our minds create images of Africans inhumanely crowded aboard ships plying the middle passage from Africa, or of blacks stooped to pick cotton in Southern fields. We don’t conjure images of American Indians chained in coffles and marched to ports like Boston and Charleston, and then shipped to other ports in the Atlantic world. Yet Indian slavery and an Indian slave trade were ubiquitous in early America.
From the Atlantic to the Pacific, and from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada, tens of thousands of America’s native peoples were enslaved, many of them transported to lands distant from their homes. Our historical mythology posits that American Indians could not be enslaved in large numbers because they too readily succumbed to disease when exposed to Europeans and they were too wedded to freedom to allow anyone to own them. Yet many indigenous people developed resistance to European diseases after being exposed to the newcomers for well over a century. And it is a racist conception that “inferior” Africans accepted their debased position as slaves – a status that American Indians and Europeans presumably could never have accepted. This is a gross misconception of history. We are just scratching the surface of what this all means. For the enslavement of Indians forces us to rethink not only the institution of slavery, but the evolution of racism and racist ideologies in America. In the 17th century, Europeans, Africans and American Indians all accepted slavery as a legitimate social institution.
Treatment and status of the enslaved varied greatly from group to group. War captives provided most slaves, though the Europeans made slavery inheritable. Africans and Indians did exchange slaves as commodities, but Europeans introduced an international market economy for labor, as colonial plantation societies developed an insatiable demand for workers, spurring the African slave trade as well as various forms of bond labor for impoverished Europeans. In the American South, European traders, mostly British colonists operating out of Charleston, South Carolina, engaged local and distant American Indian tribes to undertake slaving against their neighbors, who could be made to walk to ships that would carry them to Barbados, New York, Antigua and other ports in the Atlantic world, where they would work as slaves. The South Carolinians used some of these slaves to work their own plantations, but because of the ability of captives to escape over familiar territory among familiar peoples, their captors preferred to export most of them elsewhere. Capital from selling Indian slaves was used to fund plantations and purchase Africans. It was as if one could create capital out of thin air: The only effort lay in capturing the prey and transporting it to market. Native peoples engaged in slaving for a variety of reasons. In exchange for captives, they received European trade goods. Many also hoped to forge closer relations with the British. To refuse to become slave raiders, they risked becoming categorized as potential victims, with their enemies then filling the role of slavers. The result: A frenzy of slaving infected the region, as natives captured not only their enemies, but people they had never met. Some went farther and captured their friends and allies. Small-scale raids with attacks on fewer than a dozen people evolved into large-scale wars, with the British and their American-Indian allies seeking captives in the thousands. Extending southward from Charleston, British and native raiders followed attacks upon the native peoples of Georgia with a massive onslaught against Indians on Spanish missions in northern Florida. Systematically, the raiders extended all the way to the Florida Keys. Simultaneously, the English established important ties with the Chickasaw, who became the key slavers of the lower Mississippi Valley, extending their attacks west of the Mississippi and south to the Gulf of Mexico.
The Chickasaw, surrounded by enemies on all sides, used slaving as a way to strengthen themselves at their enemies’ expense, but great losses in slaving wars weakened them immensely. The numbers are difficult to calculate, but I estimate that 30,000 to 50,000, perhaps more, American Indians were exported from Charleston. Thousands more were exported from ports like Boston and Salem, and, on a much smaller scale, by the French from New Orleans.
Untold numbers, which scholars are just beginning to calculate, will ultimately include the thousands who were not exported from their region but lived out their lives as slaves on plantations in Virginia, as farm laborers in Connecticut and as domestics in New France. Although the scale of enslavement pales in comparison to the African slave trade, it is notable, for instance, that from 1670 to 1717, far more American Indians were exported from Charleston than Africans were brought in. Scholars long have known about the Indian slave trade, but the scattered nature of the sources deterred a systematic examination. No one had any conception of the trade’s massive extent and that it played such a central role in the lives of early Americans and in the colonial economy.
Indian slavery complicates the narrative we have created of a white-black world, with Indians residing outside on a vaguely defined frontier. The Indian slave trade connects native and European history, so that plantations and American Indian communities become entwined. We find planters making more money from slave trading than planting, and if we look more closely we find Indians not only enslaved on plantations but working as police forces to maintain those plantations and receiving substantial rewards for returning runaway slaves. We are also learning a great deal more about American-Indian peoples.
Most importantly we can now tell the stories – the tragedies – that befell so many who were killed in slaving wars or spent their days as slaves far from their homes. They and their peoples have been largely forgotten. The Natchez, Westo, Yamasee, Euchee, Yazoo and Tawasa are among the dozens of Indian peoples who fell victims to the slaving wars, with the survivors forced to join other native communities. These are tales that Indians themselves have not told: Just as the story of Indian slavery was excluded from the European past, it was largely forgotten in American-Indian traditions. Americans often wish the past would just go away, save for those symbols we celebrate: Pocahontas saving John Smith, the “noble savage,” and the first Thanksgiving. The image of Pilgrims and Indians sharing a meal is one of the most cogent images we have of American Indians and of the colonization of this continent.

You can find more about South Carolina and Indian slavery at:
http://www.pantribalconfederacy.com/confederacy/useful/pdf/indian_slavery.pdf
NATIVE AMERICAN OR AMERICAN INDIAN?
In the past there has been controversy over the use of these two terms to describe these peoples. It basically sorted itself out in that either term is acceptable and synonymous. Some prefer one over the other and some are acceptable with either term. ” A 1995 Census Bureau Survey of preferences for racial and ethnic terminology (there is no more recent survey) indicated that 49% of Native people preferred being called American Indian, 37% preferred Native American, 3.6% preferred “some other term,” and 5% had no preference.” Regardless of what term is used, these people deserve recognition of their struggles and survival against all odds.
While you may find many links on the internet in regards to this topic, here is one that you might wish to peruse:
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/aihmterms.html
WORDS OF WISDOM:
An Indian Chief, in 1876 said:
“Peace and happiness are available in every moment. Peace is every step. We shall walk hand in hand. There are no political solutions to spiritual problems.
Remember: If the Creator put it there, it is in the right place. The soul would have no rainbow if the eyes had no tears.
Tell your people, that since we were promised we should never be moved, we have been moved five times.”
BRIEF FAMILY HISTORY:
I am a descendant of the Woccon Indians who lived in eastern North Carolina and who frequented the Outer Banks to gather fish and shellfish. In 1585 when John White first visited what is now known as Ocracoke, he found the tribe there. Through the years as the white settlers infiltrated the island, some of them mixed with the Indians. I discovered this when I was doing genealogy research on my Mother’s family. I found that my great great great grandfather and his father before him were part of the original Ocracoke pilots who ferried supplies from Virginia to North Carolina. Somewhere along that line, or even before, there was the mix because they were classified by the 1850 Census of Hyde County, NC as “Free Persons of Color” and designated as Mulatto - (Reference: http://coastalcarolinaindians.com/research/genealogy.htm).
While the only physical attribute I carry of those people are my high cheek bones, my Grandmother carries many more of those attributes. I present my Grandmother, Florence Bragg/Geffrory Smith
Sources:
http://www.archives.gov/research/native-americans/pictures/images/indians-021a.jpg
http://www.pantribalconfederacy.com/confederacy/useful/pdf/indian_slavery.pdf
http://www.picturehistory.com/images/products/2/8/6/prod_28603.jpg
http://www.salesianhigh.org/faculty/wri/thanks6.JPG
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/aihmterms.html
http://www.firstpeople.us/FP-Html-Wisdom/Anon.html
After reading this article you will have garnered a little knowledge on how these people felt after being forced to do things that were against their grain.
We too are now facing atrocities. Our freedoms and way of life are being stripped from us one at a time. Don’t let history repeat itself. Get involved. Defend our Constitution.
















![MCj03871910000[1] MCj03871910000[1]](http://rosettasister.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/mcj038719100001.jpg?w=176&h=130)




























